arm: dts: lpc32xx: update ssp / spi nodes
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 of 3 patches 0 repliesNew
2 of 3 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 3.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3 | arm: dts: lpc32xx: add clock properties to spi nodes | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 3/3 | arm: dts: phy3250: enable ssp0 | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/3] arm: dts: lpc32xx: update ssp / spi nodes
Hi Arnd,
Quoted 23 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 11 lines · On Thursday 14 April 2016 08:20:34 slemieux.tyco at gmail.com wrote:
From: Sylvain Lemieux <[email protected]>
This patchset change the following:
1) adds clock properties to spi peripheral devices, clock ids are taken fromdt-bindings/clock/lpc32xx-clock.h2) disable, by default, the SSP0/SPI1 and SSP1/SPI2 shared pinout; shared pin should be enable in board specific dts, as needed.
3) enable SSP0 used by PHY3250.
Quoted 10 lines
Sylvain Lemieux (3):
arm: dts: lpc32xx: add clock properties to spi nodes
arm: dts: lpc32xx: disabled ssp0/spi1 & ssp1/spi2 by default
arm: dts: phy3250: enable ssp0arch/arm/boot/dts/lpc32xx.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/phy3250.dts | 1 + 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
Quoted 5 lines
The patches look fine, but it's unclear what you want to happen with them as long as the maintainer situation is not resolved. I've seen patches from Vladimir and you recently, and none from Roland, so I think it would be good if one or both of you could officially step up to be maintainers and collect all patches to forward them to arm at kernel.org for inclusion.
for v4.5 and v4.6 I collected my own patches from LAKML after review, I started to do it for v4.7, but probably a bit later than desired.
Could you please remind me, when do ARM maintainers generally stop applying "for-next" pull requests?
Quoted 2 lines
Once we have an agreement on who does this, please send a patch to update the
MAINTAINERSfile.
I'll send a change on behalf of myself, at this point I don't think that pure lpc32xx maintenance (deliberately here I exclude development!) task takes more than 20 hours per month, which is affordable for me, Sylvain please express your view.
Quoted 6 lines
For the patch descriptions, please always start the subject with 'ARM', not 'arm' to follow the common convention, and always add a multi-line description even for trivial patches.
Arnd
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir