PM / Domains: Generic OF-based support and cleanups
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest4 of 24 patches 0 repliesNew
4 of 24 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 24.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2/24 | drivercore: Bind/unbind power domain on probe/remove | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 7/24 | ARM: shmobile: Drop dev_irq_safe from r8a7779 genpd config | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 19/24 | dt: bindings: ux500: Add documentation for power domains | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 20/24 | dt: bindings: ux500: Add header for power domains specifiers | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 00/24] PM / Domains: Generic OF-based support and cleanups
Quoted 10 lines · Ulf Hansson
Parts of this patchset has been posted earlier. To be able to smoothly continue my work in re-factoring genpd I have collected patches into this patchset.
The complete patchset is available at the linux-pm_linux-next_genpd branch at:
git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/linux-2.6.git
This branch is based upon Rafael's linux-pm tree's linux-next branch.And important note. There are dependencies througout this patchset, which means the all need to go together. I suggest we use Rafael's tree, thus I seek for acks from the affected ARM SoC maintainers.
At least on the surface, there are at least 3 separate series going on here
1) DT support for genpd
2) various genpd cleanups
3) ux500 support
Clearly they are related, but it would be easier to review if a large series like this is broken up into smaller series where the cover letters describe the dependencies between them
Kevin