Skip to content

mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect

Kevin Hilman linux-arm-kernel linux-omap 1 version New

Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]

Versions newest first

  1. v1 Latest1 of 12 patches 0 repliesNew

1 of 12 patches is in this archive. The cover letter announces 12.

Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet

#Subject and filesSizeRepliesApplied
1/12mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/endarch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c+0 -161 reply

Reviews trailers per patch

No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.

Read the v1 thread

Cover letter [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect
Quoted 22 lines · Benoit

Hi Kevin,

Quoted 10 lines · Kevin Hilman

Hi Benoit,

Benoit Cousson<[email protected]> writes:

[...]

Quoted 2 lines

This is not for pull-request, becasue it is based on irqdomain + OMAP IRQ DT series + OMAP twl DT series yet to be pushed.

What's the status of this series?

I sent earlier today the pull request to Samuel.

Here is the branch for information: for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_mmc_fix

Quoted 3 lines

At least 'gpio/twl: Allocate irq_desc dynamically for SPARSE_IRQ support' is needed in mainline (linux-next) now since without it, non-DT boots will dump a big fat warning trace[2].

Quoted 6 lines

Yeah, I know :-(

Quoted 1 line

Also FYI, I needed the patch below[1] in order to build this series.

That's weird, this include was added by the following commit a7cbb9b15d55dff0488b1a6d93929c2386d8632b at 3.2 time frame.

OK.

Quoted 1 line

What branch are you using?

I was using your for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_cleanup, but had some merge conflicts. Maybe I mis-merged something and dropped that include.

Kevin

Read the cover letter in its thread