lustre: missing fixes and cleanups from lustre 2.10
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest13 of 31 patches 0 repliesNew
13 of 31 patches are in this archive. The cover letter announces 31.
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7/31 | lustre: lnet: change positional struct initializers to C99 | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 8/31 | lustre: llite: don't zero timestamps internally | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 11/31 | lustre: lnet: Fix route hops print | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 11/31 | lustre: lnet: Fix route hops print | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 11/31 | lustre: lnet: Fix route hops print | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 11/31 | lustre: lnet: Fix route hops print | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 11/31 | lustre: lnet: Fix route hops print | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 13/31 | lustre: config: don't attach sub logs for LWP | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 25/31 | lustre: config: move config types into lustre_idl.h | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 25/31 | lustre: config: move config types into lustre_idl.h | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 25/31 | lustre: config: move config types into lustre_idl.h | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 30/31 | lustre: fid: race between client_fid_fini and seq_client_flush | +0 | 1 reply | |
| 30/31 | lustre: fid: race between client_fid_fini and seq_client_flush | +0 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [lustre-devel] [PATCH 00/31] lustre: missing fixes and cleanups from lustre 2.10
Quoted 5 lines · James Simmons
This covers all the missing patches landed from the start of the lustre 2.10 development cycle until right before the PFL feature landed. Several bug fixes as well as cleanups. This is based on top of the recent list patches as well as my mount code for llite patch series.
I've applied all these to my lustre-testing branch, plus the fixups I promised.
I cannot review them for correctness, just for whether the code looks sensible and appears consistent with upstream style.
If my testing shows no problems and I don't hear any complaints I suspect they will migrate to 'lustre' in a week or so.
BTW I've created a new branch 'lustre-wip' which contains patches that depend on changes to non-lustre code, and so are likely to be delayed more than I would like...
Thanks,
NeilBrown
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20180801/5bdd3769/attachment.sig>