RFC common service startup files
Get series with b4
b4 am 20150422220234.GA11809@vostroVersions newest first · linked by author and title
- v2 RFC Latest posting 3/30 of 5 patches 0 repliesNew
- v2 RFC posting 2/36 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v2 RFC posting 1/30 of 5 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 1
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 RFC | 11 patches | 0 replies | Superseded |
Patches in v2 posting 3/3 No applies recorded yet
None of the 5 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v2 yet.
Cover letter [Buildroot] [RFC v2 0/5] common service startup files
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Thanks for this proposal. However, as you have seen, the general feedback was not very positive. We don't really like having a specialized language being created for Buildroot, so the overall approach doesn't really match the "spirit" of how things are done in Buildroot.
I've marked the corresponding patches as rejected in our patch tracking system.
Ok, yeah, the initial reaction was pretty clear and I thought it has been marked as rejected for several weeks already. Looks like it wasn't, so people got those patch reminders and started replying.
-*--
And a kind of follow-up: I've got a bunch of systemd service files as a by-product of this effort, some of them for packages that have no systemd hooks at present.
If you're interested, I could either upload them somewhere for you to pick up, or alternatively start sending patches myself. One package at a time, without any global infrastructure changes.