Provide reasonable default to -n
Status from this message: Applied, thanks
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
Patches in v1 Applied
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | mempool: use a better default for number of memory channelslib/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 2/2 | eal: make the -n argument optionallib/ | +1 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
None of the 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | David Marchand |
|---|---|
| Series | A-b |
| 1/2 | |
| 2/2 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n
The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory command line argument when its really just an optimization. Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit easier to use for a first-timer.
Panu Matilainen (2):
mempool: use a better default for number of memory channels
eal: make the -n argument optional
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 8 +------- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.4.3