RFC 8K Inline Support
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest2 patches 0 repliesNew
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | nvme-rdma: Support 8K inlinedrivers/ | +15 | 2 replies | |
| 1/2 | nvme-rdma: Support 8K inline | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 1/2 | nvme-rdma: Support 8K inline | +0 | 0 replies | |
| 2/2 | nvmet-rdma: Support 8K inlinedrivers/ | +2 | 1 reply | |
| 2/2 | nvmet-rdma: Support 8K inline | +0 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH RFC 0/2] 8K Inline Support
For small nvmf write IO over the rdma transport, it is advantagous to make use of inline mode to avoid the latency of the target issuing an rdma read to fetch the data. Currently inline is used for <= 4K writes. 8K, though, requires the rdma read. For iWARP transports additional latency is incurred because the target mr of the read must be registered with remote write access. By allowing 2 pages worth of inline payload, I see a reduction in 8K nvmf write latency of anywhere from 2-7 usecs depending on the RDMA transport..
Is this a worthwhile change? I think it is. Please comment!
Thanks,
Steve
Steve Wise (2):
nvme-rdma: Support 8K inline
nvmet-rdma: Support 8K inline
drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1