RFC Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 RFC Latest5 patches 10 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/5 | eal: update socket ID API documentationdoc/ lib/ | +16 | 0 replies | |
| 2/5 | lcore: rename socket ID to NUMA IDlib/ lib/ lib/ | +12 | 0 replies | |
| 3/5 | eal: rename socket ID to NUMA ID in internal configlib/ lib/ lib/ +5 more | +39 | 0 replies | |
| 4/5 | eal: rename --socket-mem/--socket-limitdoc/ doc/ doc/ +15 more | +64 | 1 reply | |
| 5/5 | lcore: store physical package ID internallylib/ lib/ lib/ +3 more | +73 | 2 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
None of the 5 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by of their own; the series has one for all of them.
| Patch | Chengwen Feng |
|---|---|
| Series | A-b |
| 1/5 | |
| 2/5 | |
| 3/5 | |
| 4/5 | |
| 5/5 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK
While initially, DPDK has used the term "socket ID" to refer to physical package ID, the last time DPDK read "physical_package_id" for socket ID was ~9 years ago, so it's been a while since we've actually switched over to using the term "socket" to mean "NUMA node".
This wasn't a problem before, as most systems had one NUMA node per physical socket. However, in the last few years, more and more systems have multiple NUMA nodes per physical CPU socket. Since DPDK used NUMA nodes already, the transition was pretty seamless, however now we're faced with a situation when most of our documentation still uses outdated terms, and our API is ripe with references to "sockets" when in actuality we mean "NUMA nodes". This could be a source of confusion.
While completely renaming all of our API's would be a huge effort, will take a long time and arguably wouldn't even be worth the API breakages (given that this mismatch between terminology and reality is implicitly understood by most people working on DPDK, and so this isn't so much of a problem in practice), we can do some tweaks around the edges and at least document this unfortunate reality.
This patchset suggests the following changes:
- Update rte_socket/rte_lcore documentation to refer to NUMA nodes rather than sockets - Rename internal structures' fields to better reflect this intention - Rename --socket-mem/--socket-limit flags to refer to NUMA rather than sockets - Add internal API to get physical package ID [1]
The documentation is updated to refer to new EAL flags, but is otherwise left untouched, and instead the entry in "glossary" is amended to indicate that when DPDK documentation refers to "sockets", it actually means "NUMA ID's". As next steps, we could rename all API parameters to refer to NUMA ID rather than socket ID - this would not break neither API nor ABI, and instead would be a documentation change in practice.
[1] This could be used to group lcores by physical package, see e.g. discussion
under this patch: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/[email protected]/
Anatoly Burakov (5):
eal: update socket ID API documentation
lcore: rename socket ID to NUMA ID
eal: rename socket ID to NUMA ID in internal config
eal: rename --socket-mem/--socket-limit
lcore: store physical package ID internally
doc/guides/faq/faq.rst | 4 +-- doc/guides/howto/lm_bond_virtio_sriov.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/howto/lm_virtio_vhost_user.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/howto/pvp_reference_benchmark.rst | 4 +-- .../virtio_user_for_container_networking.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/linux_gsg/build_sample_apps.rst | 20 +++++------ doc/guides/linux_gsg/linux_eal_parameters.rst | 16 ++++----- doc/guides/nics/mlx4.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 2 +- .../prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst | 12 +++---- doc/guides/prog_guide/glossary.rst | 5 ++- doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/sample_app_ug/bbdev_app.rst | 6 ++-- doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst | 6 ++-- doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vdpa.rst | 2 +- doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vhost.rst | 4 +-- lib/eal/common/eal_common_dynmem.c | 14 ++++---- lib/eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c | 28 +++++++++++++--- lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 33 ++++++++++--------- lib/eal/common/eal_common_thread.c | 12 +++---- lib/eal/common/eal_internal_cfg.h | 10 +++--- lib/eal/common/eal_options.h | 8 +++-- lib/eal/common/eal_private.h | 5 ++- lib/eal/common/eal_thread.h | 11 +++++++ lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c | 2 +- lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c | 2 +- lib/eal/freebsd/eal_lcore.c | 6 ++++ lib/eal/include/rte_lcore.h | 25 +++++++------- lib/eal/linux/eal.c | 22 ++++++------- lib/eal/linux/eal_lcore.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++ lib/eal/linux/eal_memory.c | 22 ++++++------- lib/eal/windows/eal.c | 2 +- lib/eal/windows/eal_lcore.c | 7 ++++ 33 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.5