ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest2 patches 2 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | ci: work around old records of GitHub runs.github/ | +1 | 0 replies | |
| 2/2 | ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive.github/ | +31 | 1 reply |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive
Phil just reported that the check I added failed miserably
[https://github.com/phil-blain/git/runs/1238660958] in their fork, and the entire run would be abandoned. That's totally unintended, and was caused by a different metadata format for older recorded runs.
Let's work around this particular issue, and then make the entire check a lot more robust.
This patch series is based on js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests.
Johannes Schindelin (2):
ci: work around old records of GitHub runs
ci: make the "skip-if-redundant" check more defensive
.github/workflows/main.yml | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
base-commit: 4463ce75b7eea47f9b484b05957def655d3f46d5
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-748%2Fdscho%2Fci-ghwf-dedup-tests-defensive-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-748/dscho/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests-defensive-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/748
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget