negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v5 Latest2 patches 6 repliesIn review
- v42 patches 2 repliesSuperseded
- v33 patches 8 repliesSuperseded
Earlier versions · 2
| Version | Posted | Patches | Replies | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2 | 2 patches | 1 reply | Superseded | |
| v1 | 1 patch | 2 replies | Superseded |
Patches in v5 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/2 | negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspecremote.c t/ | +58 | 1 reply | |
| 2/2 | negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspecremote.c | +6 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
1 of 2 patches has a Reviewed-by or Acked-by.
| Patch | Jacob Keller |
|---|---|
| 1/2 | R-b |
| 2/2 |
Trailers given in replies are filled; those carried in the patches from earlier versions are outlined with dashes.
Cover letter [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
If remote.origin.push was set to ":", git segfaults during a push operation, due to bad parsing logic in query_matches_negative_refspec. Per bisect, the bug was introduced in: c0192df630 (refspec: add support for negative refspecs, 2020-09-30)
We found this issue when rolling out git 2.29 at Dropbox - as several folks had "push = :" in their configuration. I based my diff off the master branch, but also confirmed that it patches cleanly onto maint - if the maintainers would like to also fix the segfault on 2.29
Update since Patch series V1:
* Handled matching refspec explicitly
* Added testing for "+:" case
* Added comment explaining how the two loops work together
Update since Patch series V2
* style suggestion in remote.c
* Use test_config
* Add test for a case with a matching refspec + negative refspec
* Fix test_config to work with --add
* Updated commit message to describe what git is told to do instead of segfaulting
Update since Patch series V3
* Removed commit modifying test_config
* Remove segfault-related comments in test
* Consolidate the three tests to two tests (1st and 3rd test overlapped in functionality)
* Base the patch series on the maint branch - since the bug affects 2.29.2
Update since Patch series V4
* Squashed in Junio's patch to handle non-master named branches
* Explicitly use test_unconfig
Appreciate the reviews from Junio and Eric! Happy Holidays!
Nipunn Koorapati (2):
negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec
remote.c | 16 ++++++++-- t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
base-commit: 898f80736c75878acc02dc55672317fcc0e0a5a6
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-820%2Fnipunn1313%2Fnk%2Fpush-refspec-segfault-v5
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-820/nipunn1313/nk/push-refspec-segfault-v5
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/820
Range-diff vs v4:
1: e59ff29bdef ! 1: 48c79dc3d84 negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
@@ t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh: test_expect_success "fetch --prune with negat
'
+test_expect_success "push with matching : and negative refspec" '
-+ test_config -C two remote.one.push : &&
-+ # Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
++ # Manually handle cleanup, since test_config is not
++ # prepared to take arbitrary options like --add
++ test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
++
++ # For convenience, we use "master" to refer to the name of
++ # the branch created by default in the following.
++ #
++ # Repositories two and one have branches other than "master"
++ # but they have no overlap---"master" is the only one that
++ # is shared between them. And the master branch at two is
++ # behind the master branch at one by one commit.
++ git -C two config --add remote.one.push : &&
++
++ # A matching push tries to update master, fails due to non-ff
+ test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
+
++ # "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
++ current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
++
+ # If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
+ # to push and succeed.
-+ # We do not need test_config here as we are updating remote.one.push
-+ # again. The teardown of the first test_config will do --unset-all
-+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
-+ git -C two push one
++ git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
++
++ # With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op. Nothing gets
++ # pushed and it succeeds.
++ git -C two push -v one
+'
+
+test_expect_success "push with matching +: and negative refspec" '
-+ test_config -C two remote.one.push +: &&
-+ # Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
++ test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
++
++ # The same set-up as above, whose side-effect was a no-op.
++ git -C two config --add remote.one.push +: &&
++
++ # The push refuses to update the "master" branch that is checked
++ # out in the "one" repository, even when it is forced with +:
+ test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
+
++ # "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
++ current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
++
+ # If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
+ # to push and succeed
-+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
-+ git -C two push one
++ git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
++
++ # With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op. Nothing gets
++ # pushed and it succeeds.
++ git -C two push -v one
+'
+
test_done
2: 20575407cc0 = 2: 1f9af0e991c negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget