Skip to contentSkip to conversation

quotactl01 testcases problem

LTP Mitani 3 participants 5 messages Jan 5, 2010 – Jan 13, 2010

lore
Share & tools
lore

Mitani

author
#0 lore raw

Hi,

I tried "quotactl01" testcases, and found two problems. Second one occurred after first one's revise.

1) In the result of "quotactl01", "Success" are displayed in spite of failing in the test:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success

------------

This problem occurred because the return value of system-call "(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i], ...))" is not judged correctly in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c". Above errors are caused by TFAIL and messages are printed by TTERRNO. And there is only one place (Line 206) which uses TFAIL in "quotactl01.c"

The following patch can fix this problem:

============

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +0 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@
 	int id = getuid();
 	int newtid = -1;
 	int result;
-	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int lc;				 /* loop counter */
 	char *msg;			  /* message returned from

parse_opts */
@@ -199,10 +198,10 @@

for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++){

- ret = syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
+ TEST(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
(const char *)NULL, id,
- (caddr_t)NULL);
- if (ret != 0) {
+ (caddr_t)NULL));
+ if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cmd=0x%x",
cmd[i]);
} else {
tst_resm(TPASS, "quotactl call
succeeded");
============

However, new problem occurred after applying above patch.

2) The test failed with the following error in my system:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address

------------

"EFAULT" means that there is an error in "addr".
The format of "quotactl" is following:
------------
int quotactl(int cmd, const char *special, int id, caddr_t addr);
------------

Therefore, "EFAULT" means that 4th argument of "quotactl()" has problem.

In "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c", 4th argument of "quotactl()" is "NULL":
Is it right?

I'm glad if I get your help.

Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

#1 lore raw

Hello Mitani-San,

Did this get resolved for you ?

Regards--
Subrata

Quoted 96 lines · Mitani

Hi,

I tried "quotactl01" testcases, and found two problems. Second one occurred after first one's revise.

1) In the result of "quotactl01", "Success" are displayed in spite of failing in the test:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success

------------

This problem occurred because the return value of system-call "(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i], ...))" is not judged correctly in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c". Above errors are caused by TFAIL and messages are printed by TTERRNO. And there is only one place (Line 206) which uses TFAIL in "quotactl01.c"

The following patch can fix this problem:

============

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +0 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@
 	int id = getuid();
 	int newtid = -1;
 	int result;
-	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int lc;				 /* loop counter */
 	char *msg;			  /* message returned from

parse_opts */

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +3 -3
@@ -199,10 +198,10 @@
 
 			for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++){
 
-				ret = syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
+				TEST(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
 						(const char *)NULL, id,
-						(caddr_t)NULL);
-				if (ret != 0) {
+						(caddr_t)NULL));
+				if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
 					tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cmd=0x%x",
 cmd[i]);
 				} else {

tst_resm(TPASS, "quotactl call
succeeded");
============

However, new problem occurred after applying above patch.

2) The test failed with the following error in my system:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address

------------

"EFAULT" means that there is an error in "addr".
The format of "quotactl" is following:
------------
int quotactl(int cmd, const char *special, int id, caddr_t addr);
------------

Therefore, "EFAULT" means that 4th argument of "quotactl()" has problem.

In "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c", 4th argument of "quotactl()" is "NULL":
Is it right?

I'm glad if I get your help.

Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

Quoted 10 lines

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

author
#2 lore raw

Hello Subrata,

Not resolved yet.
I think that 4th argument of "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls /quotactl/quotactl01.c" is wrong, because the error is "TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad address".

I don't know how to revise it yet.

Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

-----Original Message-----
From: Subrata Modak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:06 PM
To: Mitani
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LTP] quotactl01 testcases problem

Hello Mitani-San,

Did this get resolved for you ?

Regards--
Subrata

Quoted 58 lines · Mitani

Hi,

I tried "quotactl01" testcases, and found two problems. Second one occurred after first one's revise.

1) In the result of "quotactl01", "Success" are displayed in spite of failing in the test:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success

------------

This problem occurred because the return value of system-call "(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i], ...))" is not judged correctly in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c". Above errors are caused by TFAIL and messages are printed by TTERRNO. And there is only one place (Line 206) which uses TFAIL in "quotactl01.c"

The following patch can fix this problem:

============

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +0 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@
 	int id = getuid();
 	int newtid = -1;
 	int result;
-	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int lc;				 /* loop counter */
 	char *msg;			  /* message returned from

parse_opts */

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +3 -3
@@ -199,10 +198,10 @@
 
 			for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++){
 
-				ret = syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
+				TEST(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
 						(const char *)NULL, id,
-						(caddr_t)NULL);
-				if (ret != 0) {
+						(caddr_t)NULL));
+				if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
 					tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cmd=0x%x",
 cmd[i]);
 				} else {

tst_resm(TPASS, "quotactl call
succeeded");
============

Quoted 6 lines

However, new problem occurred after applying above patch.

2) The test failed with the following error in my system:

------------
quotactl01 1 TFAIL : cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 2 TFAIL : cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 3 TFAIL : cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 4 TFAIL : cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 5 TFAIL : cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 6 TFAIL : cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 7 TFAIL : cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 8 TFAIL : cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 15 lines

------------

"EFAULT" means that there is an error in "addr".
The format of "quotactl" is following:
------------
int quotactl(int cmd, const char *special, int id, caddr_t addr);
------------

Therefore, "EFAULT" means that 4th argument of "quotactl()" has problem.

In "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c", 4th argument of "quotactl()" is "NULL":
Is it right?

Quoted 11 lines

I'm glad if I get your help.

Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Quoted 3 lines

This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and

easy

Quoted 6 lines

Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

author
#3 lore raw
In reply to Subrata Modak

Garrett, Subrata,

I confirmed that "quotactl01" test is finished in "PASS" (TCONF) in my system.

Thank you for your revision.

-Tomonori Mitani

-----Original Message-----
From: Subrata Modak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:06 PM
To: Mitani
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LTP] quotactl01 testcases problem

Hello Mitani-San,

Did this get resolved for you ?

Regards--
Subrata

Quoted 58 lines · Mitani

Hi,

I tried "quotactl01" testcases, and found two problems. Second one occurred after first one's revise.

1) In the result of "quotactl01", "Success" are displayed in spite of failing in the test:

------------

quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success

------------

This problem occurred because the return value of system-call "(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i], ...))" is not judged correctly in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c". Above errors are caused by TFAIL and messages are printed by TTERRNO. And there is only one place (Line 206) which uses TFAIL in "quotactl01.c"

The following patch can fix this problem:

============

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +0 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@
 	int id = getuid();
 	int newtid = -1;
 	int result;
-	int ret;
 	int i;
 	int lc;				 /* loop counter */
 	char *msg;			  /* message returned from

parse_opts */

quotactl01.c.new renamed from quotactl01.c +3 -3
@@ -199,10 +198,10 @@
 
 			for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++){
 
-				ret = syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
+				TEST(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
 						(const char *)NULL, id,
-						(caddr_t)NULL);
-				if (ret != 0) {
+						(caddr_t)NULL));
+				if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
 					tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cmd=0x%x",
 cmd[i]);
 				} else {

tst_resm(TPASS, "quotactl call
succeeded");
============

Quoted 6 lines

However, new problem occurred after applying above patch.

2) The test failed with the following error in my system:

------------
quotactl01 1 TFAIL : cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 2 TFAIL : cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 3 TFAIL : cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 4 TFAIL : cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 5 TFAIL : cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 6 TFAIL : cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 7 TFAIL : cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01 8 TFAIL : cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 15 lines

------------

"EFAULT" means that there is an error in "addr".
The format of "quotactl" is following:
------------
int quotactl(int cmd, const char *special, int id, caddr_t addr);
------------

Therefore, "EFAULT" means that 4th argument of "quotactl()" has problem.

In "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c", 4th argument of "quotactl()" is "NULL":
Is it right?

Quoted 11 lines

I'm glad if I get your help.

Regards--

-Tomonori Mitani

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Quoted 3 lines

This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and

easy

Quoted 6 lines

Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

#4 lore raw
Quoted 96 lines · Mitani

Garrett, Subrata,

I confirmed that "quotactl01" test is finished in "PASS" (TCONF) in my system.

Thank you for your revision.

-Tomonori Mitani

-----Original Message-----
From: Subrata Modak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:06 PM
To: Mitani
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LTP] quotactl01 testcases problem

Hello Mitani-San,

Did this get resolved for you ?

Regards--
Subrata

Quoted 58 lines · Mitani

Hi,

I tried "quotactl01" testcases, and found two problems. Second one occurred after first one's revise.

1) In the result of "quotactl01", "Success" are displayed in spite of failing in the test:

------------
quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=???(0): Success
------------

This problem occurred because the return value of system-call "(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i], ...))" is not judged correctly in "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c". Above errors are caused by TFAIL and messages are printed by TTERRNO. And there is only one place (Line 206) which uses TFAIL in "quotactl01.c"

The following patch can fix this problem:

============

quotactl01.c.new  2010-01-04 17:11:17.000000000 +0900 renamed from quotactl01.c      2009-12-20 09:36:35.000000000 +0900 +0 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@
       int id = getuid();
       int newtid = -1;
       int result;
-     int ret;
       int i;

      int lc;                          /* loop counter */ char *msg;                        /* message returned from parse_opts */

quotactl01.c.new  2010-01-04 17:11:17.000000000 +0900 renamed from quotactl01.c      2009-12-20 09:36:35.000000000 +0900 +3 -3
@@ -199,10 +198,10 @@
 
                       for (i = 0; i <= 7; i++){
 
-                             ret = syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
+                             TEST(syscall(__NR_quotactl, cmd[i],
                                               (const char *)NULL, id,
-                                             (caddr_t)NULL);
-                             if (ret != 0) {
+                                             (caddr_t)NULL));
+                             if (TEST_RETURN != 0) {
                                       tst_resm(TFAIL|TTERRNO, "cmd=0x%x",
 cmd[i]);
                               } else {

                                      tst_resm(TPASS, "quotactl call succeeded");
============

Quoted 6 lines

However, new problem occurred after applying above patch.

2) The test failed with the following error in my system:

------------
quotactl01    1  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800002: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    2  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800003: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    3  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800007: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    4  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800008: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    5  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800005: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    6  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800006: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    7  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800004: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 1 line

quotactl01    8  TFAIL  :  cmd=0x800001: TEST_ERRNO=EFAULT(14): Bad

address

Quoted 16 lines

------------

"EFAULT" means that there is an error in "addr".
The format of "quotactl" is following:
------------
int quotactl(int cmd, const char *special, int id, caddr_t addr);
------------

Therefore, "EFAULT" means that 4th argument of "quotactl()" has problem.

In "${LTPROOT}/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl01.c", 4th argument of "quotactl()" is "NULL":
Is it right?

I'm glad if I get your help.

It's not completely fixed; the test was broken in the first place.
I'll need to create a script which will generate a tempfs filesystem, enable quota on it, then jettison it after the test is done; otherwise $TMP could have quotas enabled or disabled (nondeterministic)... Thanks,
-Garrett

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list