f2fs: reduce region of f2fs_lock_op covered for better concurrency
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 2/2 f2fs: reduce region of f2fs_lock_op covered for better concurrency
In our rename process, region of f2fs_lock_op covered is too big as some of the code like f2fs_empty_dir/f2fs_find_entry are not needed to protect by this lock.
So in the extreme case like doing checkpoint when we rename old inode to exist inode in a large directory could cause lower concurrency.
Let's reduce the region of f2fs_lock_op to fix this.
Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>
--- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/f2fs/namei.c +8 -4
@@ -394,8 +394,6 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, goto out_old; } -f2fs_lock_op (sbi); -if (new_inode) { err = -ENOTEMPTY ;
@@ -408,6 +406,8 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,if (!new_entry) goto out_dir; +f2fs_lock_op (sbi); + err =acquire_orphan_inode (sbi);if (err) goto put_out_dir;
@@ -439,9 +439,13 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,update_inode_page (old_inode);update_inode_page (new_inode); }else { +f2fs_lock_op (sbi); + err =f2fs_add_link (new_dentry, old_inode); -if (err) +if (err) { +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); goto out_dir; + }if (old_dir_entry) {inc_nlink (new_dir);
@@ -475,6 +479,7 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,return 0 ; put_out_dir: +f2fs_unlock_op (sbi);kunmap (new_page);f2fs_put_page (new_page,0 ); out_dir:
@@ -482,7 +487,6 @@ out_dir:kunmap (old_dir_page);f2fs_put_page (old_dir_page,0 ); } -f2fs_unlock_op (sbi); out_old:kunmap (old_page);f2fs_put_page (old_page,0 );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5