Skip to contentSkip to conversation

memory allocation mystery

DISCUSSION Sasha Pachev 1 participant 1 message Jul 6, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

I have been investigating kernel behavior ( I am running 2.4.3) in out of memory conditions with swap completely disabled and discovered a rather interesting behavior. If you run the following code:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define LEAK_BLOCK (1024*1024)
#define MB (1024*1024)

int main()
{
unsigned long total = 0;
for (;;)

  {
    char* p, *p_end;
    if(!(p=malloc(LEAK_BLOCK)))
    {
      fprintf(stderr, "malloc() failed\n");
      exit(1);
    }
    p_end = p + LEAK_BLOCK;
    while(p < p_end)
      *p++ = 0;
    total += LEAK_BLOCK;
    printf("Allocated %d MB\n", total/MB);

}

return 0;
}

the process eventually gets killed by the kernel, rather than getting an error from malloc() as you would logically expect

I have straced the process and see just a bunch of old_mmap() calls like this:

old_mmap(NULL, 1052672, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0)
= 0x46b6a000

( in addition to writes to stdout, of course). So it looks like old_mmap() never returns an error.

Can somebody explain this behavior? To me it looks like a bug...

Signature · 7 lines
MySQL Development Team
For technical support contracts, visit https://order.mysql.com/
   __  ___     ___ ____  __ 
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /   Sasha Pachev <[email protected]>
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__  MySQL AB, http://www.mysql.com/
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/  Provo, Utah, USA
       <___/