Delivery Status Notification for [email protected]
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Dear Linux folks,
Probably you know it already, but the listed email address of the 3WARE SCSI drivers maintainer [email protected] doesn’t work (for me).
Please see the attached message.
Kind regards,
Paul
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:
Message will be retried for 5 more day(s)
Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7720
[192.19.192.224 192.19.192.224: timed out]
----- Original message -----
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveFBksx92G0BZX5qMdBuCDHDG4xuI0c1GPn8OQmdZmNS3ZMR9/TFIpcevk2OOorMUNMld3vQugDvWxMGFOcWZveSLRhDyWLWqRReAKzrCIwHLeIr+9x3z44bqKAnr2A3oQ=
X-Received: by 10.28.209.67 with SMTP id i64mr12975034wmg.48.1478599659285;
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 02:07:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.28.209.67 with SMTP id i64mr12975009wmg.48.1478599659097;
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 02:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.molgen.mpg.de (mx1.molgen.mpg.de. [141.14.17.9])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w203si15677261wmg.41.2016.11.08.02.07.38
for <[email protected]>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 02:07:38 -0800 (PST)Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 141.14.17.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=141.14.17.9;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 141.14.17.9 as permitted sender) [email protected]
Received: from keineahnung.molgen.mpg.de (keineahnung.molgen.mpg.de [141.14.17.193])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pmenzel) by mx.molgen.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08BAC20128247D; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:07:38 +0100 (CET)
To: [email protected]
Cc: Adam Radford <[email protected]>
From: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Subject: Ordering problems with 3ware controller
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:07:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Gm-Spam: 0
X-Gm-Phishy: 0
Dear Linux SCSI folks,
Updating from Linux 4.4.X to Linux 4.8.4, we noticed that the 3ware devices under /dev – /dev/twa0, /dev/twa1, … – map to the controllers differently.
This unfortunately breaks quite a lot of our scripts, as we depend on the fact that the first controller is also in the front.
Quoted 6 lines
$ dmesg | grep 3ware [ 14.509238] 3ware 9000 Storage Controller device driver for Linux v2.26.02.014. [ 14.824274] scsi host8: 3ware 9000 Storage Controller [ 14.824537] 3w-9xxx: scsi8: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at 0xd0200000, IRQ: 17. [ 15.508310] scsi host9: 3ware 9000 Storage Controller [ 15.508569] 3w-9xxx: scsi9: Found a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller at 0xda100000, IRQ: 17.
Tracing twi_cli it looks like the ordering of the devices in /sys/class/scsi_host might have changed, as getdents64 seems to be used for the ordering of creating /dev/twaX.
Quoted 8 lines
$ find /sys/class/scsi_host/ -ls
6033 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root system 0 Nov 8 10:58 /sys/class/scsi_host/
23125 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 17:41 /sys/class/scsi_host/host0 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:07.0/ata1/host0/scsi_host/host0
29893 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 18:03 /sys/class/scsi_host/host9 -> ../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:0e.0/0000:90:00.0/host9/scsi_host/host9
23878 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 17:41 /sys/class/scsi_host/host7 -> ../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:08.0/ata8/host7/scsi_host/host7
23640 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 17:41 /sys/class/scsi_host/host5 -> ../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:07.0/ata6/host5/scsi_host/host5
23402 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 17:41 /sys/class/scsi_host/host3 -> ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:08.0/ata4/host3/scsi_host/host3
23164 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 0 Oct 27 17:41 /sys/class/scsi_host/host1 -> ../.----- Message truncated -----
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Paul" == Paul Menzel <[email protected]> writes:
Paul,
Paul> Probably you know it already, but the listed email address of the Paul> 3WARE SCSI drivers maintainer [email protected] doesn’t work (for Paul> me).
Ownership of these products is now with Broadcom. To my knowledge the 3ware product lines have been discontinued.
Signature · 1 line
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Dear Martin,
Quoted 8 lines · Martin K. Petersen
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Paul" == Paul Menzel <[email protected]> writes:
Paul> Probably you know it already, but the listed email address of the Paul> 3WARE SCSI drivers maintainer [email protected] doesn’t work (for Paul> me).
Ownership of these products is now with Broadcom. To my knowledge the 3ware product lines have been discontinued.
Indeed. I forgot to actually formulate the intend of my message.
What should happen to the entry in the file MAINTAINERS?
Kind regards,
Paul
Quoted 18 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-scsi- [email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Menzel
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:40 PM
To: Martin K. Petersen
Cc: [email protected]; James E.J. Bottomley
Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification for [email protected]Dear Martin,
Quoted 6 lines · Martin K. Petersen
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Paul" == Paul Menzel <[email protected]> writes:
Paul> Probably you know it already, but the listed email address of Paul> the 3WARE SCSI drivers maintainer [email protected] doesn’t work Paul> (for me).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Ownership of these products is now with Broadcom. To my knowledge the 3ware product lines have been discontinued.
Indeed. I forgot to actually formulate the intend of my message.
What should happen to the entry in the file
MAINTAINERS?
3Ware product is discontinue from support point of view. We are discussing with LSI/Broadcom management team to clean up this part and provide more clarity.
Please wait for reply as we are waiting for internal communication.
Quoted 10 lines
Kind regards,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of
a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 2 lines · Martin K. Petersen
Ownership of these products is now with Broadcom. To my knowledge the 3ware product lines have been discontinued.
That is true. I am still lurking on this list, if you want to update the email address to: [email protected], I'm fine with that. I'll probably reply if there is something I can help with.
-Adam
Quoted 8 lines · adam radford
Quoted 2 lines · Martin K. Petersen
Ownership of these products is now with Broadcom. To my knowledge the 3ware product lines have been discontinued.
That is true. I am still lurking on this list, if you want to update the email address to: [email protected], I'm fine with that. I'll probably reply if there is something I can help with.
It would look a lot better if you submitted the patch to change this rather than having git history show someone else dumping it on you ...
Thanks,
James
Quoted 2 lines · James Bottomley
It would look a lot better if you submitted the patch to change this rather than having git history show someone else dumping it on you ...
Sure, I will do that.
-Aadm