Help! VG corrupted?
Hello,
I am running Mandrake 8.1 which installs Linux LVM 0.9. I've read posts that mention that 0.9 is "bad for your health." While I'm not totally sure why or how, it seems to be the case for me as well.
I installed the OS and ran find with one IDE HD partition dedicated (/dev/hda9, one VG on one PV) to LVM and two LV's (/usr and /var). Yesterday, I added another partition (/dev/hda7) and added its PEs to the VG. I thhen added the newly added PE's to the /usr LV. Everything was great. Then I rebooted. Upon reboot, I got:
[root@cray]# vgscan -v vgscan -- removing "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) vgscan -- scanning for all active volume group(s) first vgscan -- found inactive volume group "vg0" vgscan -- reading data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" can't get data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" creating "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" [root@cray]#
I then tried the vgcfgrestore, which ran sucessfully. Now I get vgscan reporting no volumes. Found a reference on how to fix this (using dd and reading uuids from pv's, then writing them back to the disk). That procedure brings me back to the starting point.
It seems the data is there because pvscan reports:
[root@cray]# pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- total 2 [12.02 GB] / in use: 2 [12.02 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0] [root@cray]#
One more note of interest: My partitions on disk are out of order. hda7 occupies cylinders 2848-3736 and hda9 occupies cylinders 2168-2847.
[root@cray]# fdisk /dev/hda Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 3763 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 934 7502323+ b Win95 FAT32 /dev/hda2 935 3736 22507065 5 Extended /dev/hda5 * 935 1874 7550518+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda6 1875 2135 2096451 83 Linux /dev/hda7 2848 3736 7140861 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda8 2136 2167 256977 82 Linux swap /dev/hda9 2168 2847 5462037 8e Linux LVM
Partition table entries are not in disk order
So, can anyone help me? Would recreating the VG and adding the PV's to it restore access to my data? Or would I just blow it all away in the attempt?
Please send responses directly to [email protected]
Thanks for any help!
-Ben K
[email protected]
Ben,
what does vgck(8) tell you about the health of your LVM on disk metadata?
BTW: it is recommended that you upgrade to LVM 1.0.1
Quoted 79 lines · Ben
Hello,
I am running Mandrake 8.1 which installs Linux LVM 0.9. I've read posts that mention that 0.9 is "bad for your health." While I'm not totally sure why or how, it seems to be the case for me as well.
I installed the OS and ran find with one IDE HD partition dedicated (
/dev/hda9, one VG on one PV) to LVM and two LV's (/usr and /var). Yesterday, I added another partition (/dev/hda7) and added its PEs to the VG. I thhen added the newly added PE's to the /usr LV. Everything was great. Then I rebooted. Upon reboot, I got:[root@cray]# vgscan -v vgscan -- removing "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) vgscan -- scanning for all active volume group(s) first vgscan -- found inactive volume group "vg0" vgscan -- reading data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" can't get data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" creating "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" [root@cray]#I then tried the vgcfgrestore, which ran sucessfully. Now I get vgscan reporting no volumes. Found a reference on how to fix this (using dd and reading uuids from pv's, then writing them back to the disk). That procedure brings me back to the starting point.
It seems the data is there because pvscan reports:
[root@cray]# pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- total 2 [12.02 GB] / in use: 2 [12.02 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0] [root@cray]#One more note of interest: My partitions on disk are out of order. hda7 occupies cylinders 2848-3736 and hda9 occupies cylinders 2168-2847.
[root@cray]# fdisk /dev/hda Command (m for help): pDisk
/dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 3763 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytesDevice Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 934 7502323+ b Win95 FAT32 /dev/hda2 935 3736 22507065 5 Extended /dev/hda5 * 935 1874 7550518+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda6 1875 2135 2096451 83 Linux /dev/hda7 2848 3736 7140861 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda8 2136 2167 256977 82 Linux swap /dev/hda9 2168 2847 5462037 8e Linux LVMPartition table entries are not in disk order
So, can anyone help me? Would recreating the VG and adding the PV's to it restore access to my data? Or would I just blow it all away in the attempt?
Please send responses directly to [email protected]
Thanks for any help!
-Ben K
[email protected]
Quoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf Germany
[email protected] +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sorry for the accidental repost :(
I will try to get a newer version of LVM installed this week and give you the response from vgck.
BTW, is it safe for me to just use the 1.0.1rc4 utils and kernel on a VG created with the 0.9 release?
Until then,
thanks for your advice.
-BAK
Quoted 114 lines · Heinz J . Mauelshagen
Ben,
what does vgck(8) tell you about the health of your LVM on disk metadata?
BTW: it is recommended that you upgrade to LVM 1.0.1Quoted 79 lines · Ben
Hello,
I am running Mandrake 8.1 which installs Linux LVM 0.9. I've read posts that mention that 0.9 is "bad for your health." While I'm not totally sure why or how, it seems to be the case for me as well.
I installed the OS and ran find with one IDE HD partition dedicated (
/dev/hda9, one VG on one PV) to LVM and two LV's (/usr and /var). Yesterday, I added another partition (/dev/hda7) and added its PEs to the VG. I thhen added the newly added PE's to the /usr LV. Everything was great. Then I rebooted. Upon reboot, I got:[root@cray]# vgscan -v vgscan -- removing "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) vgscan -- scanning for all active volume group(s) first vgscan -- found inactive volume group "vg0" vgscan -- reading data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" can't get data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s) vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" creating "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" [root@cray]#I then tried the vgcfgrestore, which ran sucessfully. Now I get vgscan reporting no volumes. Found a reference on how to fix this (using dd and reading uuids from pv's, then writing them back to the disk). That procedure brings me back to the starting point.
It seems the data is there because pvscan reports:
[root@cray]# pvscan pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9" is associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan) pvscan -- total 2 [12.02 GB] / in use: 2 [12.02 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0] [root@cray]#One more note of interest: My partitions on disk are out of order. hda7 occupies cylinders 2848-3736 and hda9 occupies cylinders 2168-2847.
[root@cray]# fdisk /dev/hda Command (m for help): pDisk
/dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 3763 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytesDevice Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 934 7502323+ b Win95 FAT32 /dev/hda2 935 3736 22507065 5 Extended /dev/hda5 * 935 1874 7550518+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda6 1875 2135 2096451 83 Linux /dev/hda7 2848 3736 7140861 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda8 2136 2167 256977 82 Linux swap /dev/hda9 2168 2847 5462037 8e Linux LVMPartition table entries are not in disk order
So, can anyone help me? Would recreating the VG and adding the PV's to it restore access to my data? Or would I just blow it all away in the attempt?
Please send responses directly to [email protected]
Thanks for any help!
-Ben K
[email protected]Quoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.htmlRegards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf Germany
[email protected] +49 2626 141200FAX 924446=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
Quoted 5 lines · Ben
I will try to get a newer version of LVM installed this week and give you the response from vgck.
BTW, is it safe for me to just use the 1.0.1rc4 utils and kernel on a VG created with the 0.9 release?
Well, it's broken already, isn't it? In any case, it _should_ be OK to run a newer kernel and/or newer tools (separately or together, although obviously newer everything is preferred). Whether that actually fixes your problems depends on whether the on-disk data is totally fsck'd up, and whether you can restore it and get it working or not.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/