Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Static tunable semvmx and semaem

RFC PATCH Arvind Kandhare 1 participant 1 message Jun 6, 2003 Proc sysctl

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · William Lee Irwin III

I think the __setup()'s should be moved to ipc/sem.c;

It is always better if all the initializations related to IPC V semaphores are in ipc/sem.c file. Thanks for the suggestion. Below is the updated patch with __setup()calls in ipc/sem.c.

Thanks,
Arvind
P.S. I've changed my mail client to evaluation and cross checked whether the patches works. Please get back to me in case there are any issues while patching.

include/linux/sysctl.h +2 -0
diff -Naur linux-2.5.70/include/linux/sysctl.h linux-2.5.70.n/include/linux/sysctl.h
@@ -130,6 +130,8 @@
 	KERN_PIDMAX=55,		/* int: PID # limit */
   	KERN_CORE_PATTERN=56,	/* string: pattern for core-file names */
 	KERN_PANIC_ON_OOPS=57,  /* int: whether we will panic on an oops */
+	KERN_SEMVMX=58,  	/* int: maximum limit on semval */
+	KERN_SEMAEM=59,		/* int: maximun limit on semaem */
 };
 
 
ipc/sem.c +32 -6
diff -Naur linux-2.5.70/ipc/sem.c linux-2.5.70.n/ipc/sem.c
@@ -102,6 +102,9 @@
 #define sc_semopm	(sem_ctls[2])
 #define sc_semmni	(sem_ctls[3])
 
+unsigned int semvmx=32767;
+int semaem=16384;
+
 static int used_sems;
 
 void __init sem_init (void)
@@ -280,7 +283,7 @@
 			/*
 	 		 *	Exceeding the undo range is an error.
 			 */
-			if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM)
+			if (undo < (-semaem - 1) || undo > semaem)
 			{
 				/* Don't undo the undo */
 				sop->sem_flg &= ~SEM_UNDO;
@@ -290,7 +293,7 @@
 		}
 		if (curr->semval < 0)
 			goto would_block;
-		if (curr->semval > SEMVMX)
+		if (curr->semval > semvmx)
 			goto out_of_range;
 	}
 
@@ -482,7 +485,7 @@
 		seminfo.semmns = sc_semmns;
 		seminfo.semmsl = sc_semmsl;
 		seminfo.semopm = sc_semopm;
-		seminfo.semvmx = SEMVMX;
+		seminfo.semvmx = semvmx;
 		seminfo.semmnu = SEMMNU;
 		seminfo.semmap = SEMMAP;
 		seminfo.semume = SEMUME;
@@ -492,7 +495,7 @@
 			seminfo.semaem = used_sems;
 		} else {
 			seminfo.semusz = SEMUSZ;
-			seminfo.semaem = SEMAEM;
+			seminfo.semaem = semaem;
 		}
 		max_id = sem_ids.max_id;
 		up(&sem_ids.sem);
@@ -613,7 +616,7 @@
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) {
-			if (sem_io[i] > SEMVMX) {
+			if (sem_io[i] > semvmx) {
 				err = -ERANGE;
 				goto out_free;
 			}
@@ -672,7 +675,7 @@
 		int val = arg.val;
 		struct sem_undo *un;
 		err = -ERANGE;
-		if (val > SEMVMX || val < 0)
+		if (val > semvmx || val < 0)
 			goto out_unlock;
 
 		for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
@@ -1295,6 +1298,29 @@
 	unlock_kernel();
 }
 
+static int __init _semvmx(char *str)
+{
+	get_option(&str, &semvmx);
+	if(semvmx>65535 || semvmx <=0)
+	{
+		semvmx=32767;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("semvmx=", _semvmx);
+
+static int __init _semaem(char *str)
+{
+	get_option(&str, &semaem);
+	if(semaem>32767 || semaem <=0)
+	{
+		semaem=16384;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("semaem=", _semaem);
+
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int sysvipc_sem_read_proc(char *buffer, char **start, off_t offset, int length, int *eof, void *data)
 {
kernel/sysctl.c +6 -0
diff -Naur linux-2.5.70/kernel/sysctl.c linux-2.5.70.n/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@
 extern int msg_ctlmnb;
 extern int msg_ctlmni;
 extern int sem_ctls[];
+extern unsigned int  semvmx;
+extern int semaem;
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __sparc__
@@ -237,6 +239,10 @@
 	 0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
 	{KERN_SEM, "sem", &sem_ctls, 4*sizeof (int),
 	 0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
+	{KERN_SEMVMX, "semvmx", &semvmx, sizeof (int),
+	0444, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
+	{KERN_SEMAEM, "semaem", &semaem, sizeof (int),
+	0444, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
 	{KERN_SYSRQ, "sysrq", &sysrq_enabled, sizeof (int),