LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test3-bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,bk7,mm3,mjb1
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
Thanks,
Paul Larson
2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk1 2.6.0-test3-bk2 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk2 2.6.0-test3-bk3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
*** bk4 failed to compile, but the failure was quickly fixed in bk5 ***
2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk3 2.6.0-test3-bk5 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday FAIL PASS N Y nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk5 2.6.0-test3-bk6 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y
2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk6 2.6.0-test3-bk7 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-mm2 2.6.0-test3-mm3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-mjb1 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
Quoted 7 lines · Paul Larson
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
Thanks,
Paul Larson
Ok, so suppose I want to tackle one (or more) of these. Where do I find the sources for the test. And if I find the test in error, what do I do?
Quoted 11 lines
2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk1 2.6.0-test3-bk2 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
Signature · 3 lines
George Anzinger [email protected] High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
Quoted 4 lines · Paul Larson
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
The failure in alarm03, which by the way is only some times, is caused by the need to add a jiffie to the alarm time to cover the fact that the current time is not on a jiffie boundry. If this was not done, the timer would expire early about 50% of the time. Given this correction the timer will expire some where between the requested time and the requested time + one jiffie. alarm(2), dealing with seconds, is bumping the return value by one when ever the return is not an even second, thus the 1 second longer than requested result.
In short, the test should allow the return value to be one higher than requested. -g
Quoted 92 lines
Thanks,
Paul Larson2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk1 2.6.0-test3-bk2 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk2 2.6.0-test3-bk3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N*** bk4 failed to compile, but the failure was quickly fixed in bk5 ***
2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk3 2.6.0-test3-bk5 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday FAIL PASS N Y nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk5 2.6.0-test3-bk6 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk6 2.6.0-test3-bk7 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-mm2 2.6.0-test3-mm3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-mjb1 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 3 lines
George Anzinger [email protected] High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
Quoted 7 lines · Paul Larson
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
....swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
Paul, I've not been able to reproduce those swapoff failures. Your ltp.outs indicate that it was the swapon which failed, but its error code is not shown; nor the tmpfile outputs from setup's system(3) calls (if I remember rightly, system succeeds if it can run what's asked, whether what it runs fails or not). Please try running a swapoff01 and swapoff02 modified to catch that info: it may quickly identify the issue.
Hugh