Skip to contentSkip to conversation

cpufreqd not working help?

DISCUSSION Joshua Lowell 3 participants 3 messages Aug 18, 2004 – Aug 19, 2004

lore
Share & tools
lore

Joshua Lowell

author
#0 lore raw

Hi, I have a new laptop an hp ze4805, with an amd athlon xp-m 2800+ I installed and started: powernow-k7 module, processor module is loaded, and
cpufreqd is also running. oh ac battery and fan are also running. But when I check /proc/cpuinfo after unplugging the laptop, the bogoimp and
cpu mHz stay the same... no chages are displayed at all.
any help would be more than appreciated.
thanks

#1 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Joshua Lowell

Hi, I have a new laptop an hp ze4805, with an amd athlon xp-m 2800+ I installed and started: powernow-k7 module, processor module is loaded, and
cpufreqd is also running. oh ac battery and fan are also running. But when I check /proc/cpuinfo after unplugging the laptop, the bogoimp and
cpu mHz stay the same... no chages are displayed at all.
any help would be more than appreciated.

It's a problem with userspace space, not kernel space. Please report this trouble to the cpufreqd maintainer instead (even though I think he is subscribed to this ml).

Cheers,

Signature · 4 lines
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.
#2 lore raw
Quoted 12 lines · Bruno Ducrot

Hi,

Quoted 8 lines · Joshua Lowell

Hi, I have a new laptop an hp ze4805, with an amd athlon xp-m 2800+ I installed and started: powernow-k7 module, processor module is loaded, and
cpufreqd is also running. oh ac battery and fan are also running. But when I check /proc/cpuinfo after unplugging the laptop, the bogoimp and
cpu mHz stay the same... no chages are displayed at all.
any help would be more than appreciated.

Quoted 1 line

It's a problem with userspace space, not kernel space. Please report

We'd probably need a bit more info to determine that :)

Quoted 2 lines

this trouble to the cpufreqd maintainer instead (even though I think he is subscribed to this ml).

Joshua, anyway if you think it's merely a cpufreqd problem (eg: manually changing frequency values works and /proc/cpuinfo reports the cprrect values), please let's continue the discussion in private or through cpufreqd mailing list[1].

And yes, I'm subscribed to this ml :) I've just returned from my vacation :)

[1]: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=58904

Signature · 2 lines
mattia
:wq!