remap_file_pages doesn't like MAP_ANONYMOUS (but used to?)
Subsystems (2)
Hello,
In older kernels (2.6.15-2.6.18?) I was able to make an anonymous mapping and remap part of it back over itself to create a circular buffer:
p = mmap(0, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
remap_file_pages(p + sz/2, sz/2, 0/*prot*/, 0/*offset*/, 0/*flags*/)
I find the same method fails with EINVAL on the remap_file_pages call in 2.6.35/38. Making a dummy file or shared memory object works, but seems a bit more messy.
Why drop support for ANONYMOUS? Is there another way to get the same effect?
thanks,
-Kenny
Hugh Dickins
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Kenny Simpson
Hello,
In older kernels (2.6.15-2.6.18?) I was able to make an anonymous mapping and remap part of it back over itself to create a circular buffer:
p =mmap(0, sz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
remap_file_pages(p + sz/2, sz/2, 0/*prot*/, 0/*offset*/, 0/*flags*/)I find the same method fails with EINVAL on the
remap_file_pagescall in 2.6.35/38. Making a dummy file or shared memory object works, but seems a bit more messy.Why drop support for ANONYMOUS? Is there another way to get the same effect?
Thanks for reporting. It was a simple oversight: and until you came along, nobody noticed. Here's the patch, I'll pass it upstream shortly.
[PATCH] shmem: let shared anonymous be nonlinear again
Up to 2.6.22, you could use remap_file_pages(2) on a tmpfs file or a shared mapping of /dev/zero or a shared anonymous mapping. In 2.6.23 we disabled it by default, but set VM_CAN_NONLINEAR to enable it on safe mappings. We made sure to set it in shmem_mmap() for tmpfs files, but missed it in shmem_zero_setup() for the others. Fix that at last.
---
mm/shmem.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
mm/shmem.c +1 -0
@@ -2791,5 +2791,6 @@ int shmem_zero_setup(struct vm_area_strufput (vma->vm_file); vma->vm_file = file; vma->vm_ops = &shmem_vm_ops; + vma->vm_flags |=VM_CAN_NONLINEAR ;return 0 ; }
Quoted 4 lines · Hugh Dickins
Thanks for reporting. It was a simple oversight: and until you came
along, nobody noticed. Here's the patch, I'll pass it upstream shortly.
Since this bug has existed for a while, could it be pushed back to the various stable/longterm branches as well? (as they all are affected)
Many thanks on the quick response! Glad it was a simple oversight with an easy and obvious fix.
thanks again!
-Kenny
Hugh Dickins
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Kenny Simpson
Quoted 4 lines · Hugh Dickins
Thanks for reporting. It was a simple oversight: and until you came
along, nobody noticed. Here's the patch, I'll pass it upstream shortly.
Quoted 6 lines
Since this bug has existed for a while, could it be pushed back to the various stable/longterm branches as well? (as they all are affected)
Many thanks on the quick response! Glad it was a simple oversight with an easy and obvious fix.
thanks again!
-Kenny
It's a rare pleasure to be presented with such a straightforward bug!
stable/longterm: well, I don't mind asking akpm to add a Cc: stable, but don't be surprised if he prefers not: although it was a regression back in 2.6.23, it's not a security issue, and the lack of interest between then and now doesn't make a strong argument for it.
Andrew, if you're so inclined, please add a Cc: [email protected] to [PATCH] shmem: let shared anonymous be nonlinear again
Thanks,
Hugh