Audit: use == not = in if statements
Eric Paris
maintainerPATCH 1/1 Audit: use == not = in if statements
Clearly this was supposed to be an == not an = in the if statement. This patch also causes us to stop processing execve args once we have failed rather than continuing to loop on failure over and over and over.
Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>
---
kernel/auditsc.c | 5 ++++- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
kernel/auditsc.c +4 -1
@@ -1000,9 +1000,10 @@ static int audit_log_single_execve_arg(struct audit_context *context,* for strings that are too long, we should not have created * any. */ -if (unlikely ((len =-1 ) || len >MAX_ARG_STRLEN -1 )) { +if (unlikely ((len ==-1 ) || len >MAX_ARG_STRLEN -1 )) {WARN_ON (1 );send_sig (SIGKILL , current,0 ); +return -1 ; }/* walk the whole argument looking for non-ascii chars */
@@ -1020,6 +1021,7 @@ static int audit_log_single_execve_arg(struct audit_context *context,if (ret) {WARN_ON (1 );send_sig (SIGKILL , current,0 ); +return -1 ; } buf[to_send] ='\0' ; has_cntl =audit_string_contains_control (buf, to_send);
@@ -1083,6 +1085,7 @@ static int audit_log_single_execve_arg(struct audit_context *context,if (ret) {WARN_ON (1 );send_sig (SIGKILL , current,0 ); +return -1 ; } buf[to_send] ='\0' ;
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Paris
Clearly this was supposed to be an == not an = in the if statement. This patch also causes us to stop processing execve args once we have failed rather than continuing to loop on failure over and over and over.
Signed-off-by Eric Paris <[email protected]>
ACK.