mpc512x uart: testers wanted
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 1272392908.6504.0@antares
Hi Grant:
Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dreß:
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed comments, unfortunately forgot to mark it as v4, but it is threaded to your v.3a patch and contains a small changelog, so I hope it is not a problem.
Grant? Is this fine for you, or should I "officially" re-send it?
*ping*
IMHO, this issue can be closed now, as the correct uart operation has been verified on both the 512x (Anatolij) and 5200 (me) processors. Do you accept Anatolij's "joint patch" he sent on Apr 26, or is that procedure too confusing? And do we need further Acked-by's?
Cheers, Albrecht.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Albrecht Dre=DF <[email protected]> w= rote:
Quoted 7 lines
Hi Grant:
Am 27.04.10 20:28 schrieb(en) Albrecht Dre=DF:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
MPC5121e Hardware Design Guide provides correct info according to my tests using /16 and /10 prescaler. I've send a new patch with the fixed comments, unfortunately forgot to mark it as v4, but it is threaded to =
your
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
v.3a patch and contains a small changelog, so I hope it is not a proble=
m.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Grant? =A0Is this fine for you, or should I "officially" re-send it?
*ping*
IMHO, this issue can be closed now, as the correct uart operation has bee=
n
Quoted 2 lines
verified on both the 512x (Anatolij) and 5200 (me) processors. =A0Do you accept Anatolij's "joint patch" he sent on Apr 26, or is that procedure t=
oo
Quoted 1 line
confusing? =A0And do we need further Acked-by's?
Yes, I'll pick up Anatolij's patch. No further work needed by you.
g.