Skip to contentSkip to conversation

acerhdf: fix resource reclaim in error path

PATCH In review Axel Lin 3 participants 3 messages Jul 7, 2010 – Jul 10, 2010

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Axel Lin

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 acerhdf: fix resource reclaim in error path

This patch fix resource reclaim in below cases:
1. acerhdf_register_platform() does not properly handle platform_device_alloc() failure and platform_device_add() failure This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform().
2. acerhdf_register_platform() return err with acerhdf_dev == NULL. as a result, acerhdf_unregister_platform() does not do resource reclaim in acerhdf_init() error path.
This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform(), thus correct the error handing path in acerhdf_init(). goto out_err instead of err_unreg if acerhdf_register_platform() fail.
3. platform_device_del() should only used in error handling. Current implementation missed a platform_device_put() in acerhdf_exit. This patch fixes it by using platform_device_unregister() instead of platform_device_del() in acerhdf_unregister_platform.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c +16 -7
index 7b2384d..d9f5ebb 100644
@@ -579,17 +579,26 @@ static int acerhdf_register_platform(void)
 		return err;
 
 	acerhdf_dev = platform_device_alloc("acerhdf", -1);
-	platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (!acerhdf_dev) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_device_alloc;
+	}
+	err = platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_device_add;
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_device_add:
+	platform_device_put(acerhdf_dev);
+err_device_alloc:
+	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void acerhdf_unregister_platform(void)
 {
-	if (!acerhdf_dev)
-		return;
-
-	platform_device_del(acerhdf_dev);
+	platform_device_unregister(acerhdf_dev);
 	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
 }
 
@@ -633,7 +642,7 @@ static int __init acerhdf_init(void)
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_platform();
 	if (err)
-		goto err_unreg;
+		goto out_err;
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_thermal();
 	if (err)
@@ -646,7 +655,7 @@ err_unreg:
 	acerhdf_unregister_platform();
 
 out_err:
-	return -ENODEV;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void __exit acerhdf_exit(void)
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.3
Acked-by on v2 1/1
#1 lore raw

From: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 04:39:31PM +0800

Quoted 15 lines

This patch fix resource reclaim in below cases:
1. acerhdf_register_platform() does not properly handle platform_device_alloc() failure and platform_device_add() failure This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform().
2. acerhdf_register_platform() return err with acerhdf_dev == NULL. as a result, acerhdf_unregister_platform() does not do resource reclaim in acerhdf_init() error path.
This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform(), thus correct the error handing path in acerhdf_init(). goto out_err instead of err_unreg if acerhdf_register_platform() fail.
3. platform_device_del() should only used in error handling. Current implementation missed a platform_device_put() in acerhdf_exit. This patch fixes it by using platform_device_unregister() instead of platform_device_del() in acerhdf_unregister_platform.

Quoted 1 line

Ok, I just gave it a run and it looks good. Just a minor nitpick: when writing your commit messages you don't have to explain what the code does since we can see it in the patch itself. Rather, your commit message should explain why you do this.

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt for further info on how to create your patches.

Other than that:

Quoted 63 lines
---
 drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c +16 -7
index 7b2384d..d9f5ebb 100644
@@ -579,17 +579,26 @@ static int acerhdf_register_platform(void)
 		return err;
 
 	acerhdf_dev = platform_device_alloc("acerhdf", -1);
-	platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (!acerhdf_dev) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_device_alloc;
+	}
+	err = platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_device_add;
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_device_add:
+	platform_device_put(acerhdf_dev);
+err_device_alloc:
+	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void acerhdf_unregister_platform(void)
 {
-	if (!acerhdf_dev)
-		return;
-
-	platform_device_del(acerhdf_dev);
+	platform_device_unregister(acerhdf_dev);
 	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
 }
 
@@ -633,7 +642,7 @@ static int __init acerhdf_init(void)
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_platform();
 	if (err)
-		goto err_unreg;
+		goto out_err;
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_thermal();
 	if (err)
@@ -646,7 +655,7 @@ err_unreg:
 	acerhdf_unregister_platform();
 
 out_err:
-	return -ENODEV;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void __exit acerhdf_exit(void)
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.3
Signature · 2 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
maintainer Acked-by
#2 lore raw
Quoted 25 lines · Borislav Petkov

From: Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 04:39:31PM +0800

Quoted 15 lines

This patch fix resource reclaim in below cases:
1. acerhdf_register_platform() does not properly handle platform_device_alloc() failure and platform_device_add() failure This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform().
2. acerhdf_register_platform() return err with acerhdf_dev == NULL. as a result, acerhdf_unregister_platform() does not do resource reclaim in acerhdf_init() error path.
This patch adds error handing for acerhdf_register_platform(), thus correct the error handing path in acerhdf_init(). goto out_err instead of err_unreg if acerhdf_register_platform() fail.
3. platform_device_del() should only used in error handling. Current implementation missed a platform_device_put() in acerhdf_exit. This patch fixes it by using platform_device_unregister() instead of platform_device_del() in acerhdf_unregister_platform.

Quoted 1 line

Ok, I just gave it a run and it looks good. Just a minor nitpick: when writing your commit messages you don't have to explain what the code does since we can see it in the patch itself. Rather, your commit message should explain why you do this.

Quoted 6 lines

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt for further info on how to create your patches.

Other than that:

Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 53 lines
---
 drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c +15 -6
index 7b2384d..d9f5ebb 100644
@@ -579,17 +579,26 @@ static int acerhdf_register_platform(void)
 		return err;
 
 	acerhdf_dev = platform_device_alloc("acerhdf", -1);
-	platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (!acerhdf_dev) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_device_alloc;
+	}
+	err = platform_device_add(acerhdf_dev);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_device_add;
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_device_add:
+	platform_device_put(acerhdf_dev);
+err_device_alloc:
+	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void acerhdf_unregister_platform(void)
 {
-	if (!acerhdf_dev)
-		return;
-
-	platform_device_del(acerhdf_dev);
+	platform_device_unregister(acerhdf_dev);
 	platform_driver_unregister(&acerhdf_driver);
 }
 
@@ -633,7 +642,7 @@ static int __init acerhdf_init(void)
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_platform();
 	if (err)
-		goto err_unreg;
+		goto out_err;
 
 	err = acerhdf_register_thermal();
 	if (err)
@@ -646,7 +655,7 @@ err_unreg:
 	acerhdf_unregister_platform();
 
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c +1 -1
 out_err:
-	return -ENODEV;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void __exit acerhdf_exit(void)
Signature · 1 line
1.5.4.3

thank you,
--peter;