Staging: spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn
Quoted 8 lines
Ok, I'll just keep this in my to-apply queue again, and then apply it when it is needed for Linus's tree. Is that ok?
thanks,
greg k-h
I found more compile errors (more API changes) with this driver in today linux-next.
I prepared a patch-set containing the previous patch sent and two more. This three patches allow spectra driver to compile in today linux-next.
Do you want me to do it this way (keeping a patchset) or should I send separate patches as issues arises?
The patchset I will send contains the following patches:
[PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn [PATCH 2/3] fix staging/spectra: use new REQ_FLUSH flag [PATCH 3/3] fix staging/spectra: don't use locked_ioctl
Thanks a lot
Quoted 15 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Quoted 8 lines
Ok, I'll just keep this in my to-apply queue again, and then apply it when it is needed for Linus's tree. Is that ok?
thanks,
greg k-h
I found more compile errors (more API changes) with this driver in today linux-next.
I prepared a patch-set containing the previous patch sent and two more. This three patches allow spectra driver to compile in today linux-next.
Quoted 8 lines
Do you want me to do it this way (keeping a patchset) or should I send separate patches as issues arises?
The patchset I will send contains the following patches:
[PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes
q->prepare_flush_fn[PATCH 2/3] fix staging/spectra: use newREQ_FLUSHflag [PATCH 3/3] fix staging/spectra: don't uselocked_ioctl
Three patches are fine, I'll keep them for when they are needed during the next merge window.
thanks,
greg k-h