xfs: handle negative wbc->nr_to_write during sync writeback
PATCH 1/1 xfs: handle negative wbc->nr_to_write during sync writeback
From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
During data integrity (WB_SYNC_ALL) writeback, wbc->nr_to_write will go negative on inodes with more than 1024 dirty pages due to implementation details of write_cache_pages(). Currently XFS will abort page clustering in writeback once nr_to_write drops below zero, and so for data integrity writeback we will do very inefficient page at a time allocation and IO submission for inodes with large numbers of dirty pages.
Fix this by only aborting the page clustering code when wbc->nr_to_write is negative and the sync mode is WB_SYNC_NONE.
--- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c +2 -2
@@ -852,8 +852,8 @@ xfs_convert_page(SetPageUptodate (page);if (count) { - wbc->nr_to_write--; -if (wbc->nr_to_write <=0 ) +if (--wbc->nr_to_write <=0 && + wbc->sync_mode ==WB_SYNC_NONE ) done =1 ; }xfs_start_page_writeback (page, !page_dirty, count);
Signature · 6 lines
1.7.1 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 10 lines · Dave Chinner
From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
During data integrity (
WB_SYNC_ALL) writeback,wbc->nr_to_writewill go negative on inodes with more than 1024 dirty pages due to implementation details ofwrite_cache_pages(). Currently XFS will abort page clustering in writeback oncenr_to_writedrops below zero, and so for data integrity writeback we will do very inefficient page at a time allocation and IO submission for inodes with large numbers of dirty pages.
Quoted 2 lines
Fix this by only aborting the page clustering code when
wbc->nr_to_writeis negative and the sync mode isWB_SYNC_NONE.
Looks okay, but I wonder why if we should remove the check entirely. We're clustering inside the same extent, and we already have a cap for the extent size. That means the additional I/O basically is for free and we really shouldn't let the writeback code restrict us here.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs