KVM: x86: Fix uninitialized eoi_exit_bitmap usage in vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap()
PATCH 1/1 KVM: x86: Fix uninitialized eoi_exit_bitmap usage in vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap()
In vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(), currently the eoi_exit_bitmap[4] array is initialized only when Hyper-V context is available, in other path it is just passed to kvm_x86_ops.load_eoi_exitmap() directly from on the stack, which would cause unexpected interrupt delivery/handling issues, e.g. an *old* linux kernel that relies on PIT to do clock calibration on KVM might randomly fail to boot.
Fix it by passing ioapic_handled_vectors to load_eoi_exitmap() when Hyper-V context is not available.
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +7 -4
@@ -9547,11 +9547,14 @@ static void vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)if (!kvm_apic_hw_enabled (vcpu->arch.apic))return ; -if (to_hv_vcpu (vcpu)) -bitmap_or ((ulong *)eoi_exit_bitmap, - vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors, -to_hv_synic (vcpu)->vec_bitmap,256 ); +if (!to_hv_vcpu (vcpu)) { +static_call (kvm_x86_load_eoi_exitmap)( + vcpu, (u64 *)vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors); +return ; + } +bitmap_or ((ulong *)eoi_exit_bitmap, vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors, +to_hv_synic (vcpu)->vec_bitmap,256 );static_call (kvm_x86_load_eoi_exitmap)(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap); }
Quoted 11 lines · 黄乐
In
vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(), currently the eoi_exit_bitmap[4] array is initialized only when Hyper-V context is available, in other path it is just passed tokvm_x86_ops.load_eoi_exitmap()directly from on the stack, which would cause unexpected interrupt delivery/handling issues, e.g. an *old* linux kernel that relies on PIT to do clock calibration on KVM might randomly fail to boot.Fix it by passing
ioapic_handled_vectorstoload_eoi_exitmap()when Hyper-V context is not available.Signed-off-by Huang Le <[email protected]>
Quoted 14 lines
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +1
-4@@ -9547,11 +9547,14 @@ static void vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)if (!kvm_apic_hw_enabled (vcpu->arch.apic))return ; -if (to_hv_vcpu (vcpu)) -bitmap_or ((ulong *)eoi_exit_bitmap, - vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors, -to_hv_synic (vcpu)->vec_bitmap,256 ); +if (!to_hv_vcpu (vcpu)) {
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c static void vcpu_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) · line 9560
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +6
-0+static_call (kvm_x86_load_eoi_exitmap)( + vcpu, (u64 *)vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors); +return ; + } +bitmap_or ((ulong *)eoi_exit_bitmap, vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors, +to_hv_synic (vcpu)->vec_bitmap,256 );static_call (kvm_x86_load_eoi_exitmap)(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap); }
My personal preference, however, would be to keep 'if (to_hv_vcpu(vcpu))' check and not invert it, i.e.:
if (to_hv_vcpu(vcpu)) {
bitmap_or((ulong *)eoi_exit_bitmap,
vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors,
to_hv_synic(vcpu)->vec_bitmap, 256);
static_call(...)(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap)
return;
}
static_call(...)(vcpu, (u64 *)vcpu->arch.ioapic_handled_vectors);to slightly reduce the code churn but it doesn't matter much.
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Vitaly