ASoC: Remove redundant freq assignment for max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk
PATCH 1/1 ASoC: Remove redundant freq assignment for max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk
Current implementation set max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk to freq twice. Set it once is enough, this patch removes the first assignment in case we may set invalid clock frequency to max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk.
---
hi Peter,
I don't have this hardware handy. Can you help to test it? Thanks,
Axel
sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c | 2 -- sound/soc/codecs/max98095.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c +0 -2
@@ -1397,8 +1397,6 @@ static int max98088_dai_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,if (freq == max98088->sysclk)return 0 ; - max98088->sysclk = freq;/* remember current sysclk */ -/* Setup clocks for slave mode, and using the PLL * PSCLK = 0x01 (when master clk is 10MHz to 20MHz) * 0x02 (when master clk is 20MHz to 30MHz)..
sound/soc/codecs/max98095.c +0 -2
@@ -1517,8 +1517,6 @@ static int max98095_dai_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,if (freq == max98095->sysclk)return 0 ; - max98095->sysclk = freq;/* remember current sysclk */ -/* Setup clocks for slave mode, and using the PLL * PSCLK = 0x01 (when master clk is 10MHz to 20MHz) * 0x02 (when master clk is 20MHz to 40MHz)..
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Quoted 11 lines · Axel Lin
Current implementation set max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk to freq twice. Set it once is enough, this patch removes the first assignment in case we may set invalid clock frequency to max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>---
hi Peter,
I don't have this hardware handy. Can you help to test it? Thanks,
Axel
Quoted 11 lines · Alex Lin
Current implementation set max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk to freq twice. Set it once is enough, this patch removes the first assignment in case we may set invalid clock frequency to max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>---
hi Peter,
I don't have this hardware handy. Can you help to test it? Thanks,
Axel
Mark Brown
AppliedQuoted 3 lines · Axel Lin
Current implementation set max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk to freq twice. Set it once is enough, this patch removes the first assignment in case we may set invalid clock frequency to max98095->sysclk/max98088->sysclk.
Applied, thanks.