Skip to contentSkip to conversation

btrfs fixes

GIT PULL Chris Mason 2 participants 2 messages Jul 8, 2011 – Jul 11, 2011 Btrfs file system

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi everyone,

The for-linus branch of the btrfs-unstable repo:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git for-linus

Has three more fixes. We're fixing oopsen during space balancing (btrfs filesystem balance /mnt)) and during device removal.

Dave Sterba also sent in a patch to make /proc/mounts properly match a few new mount options, which he (correctly I think) considers a regression fix because it makes it hard for testers/users to verify the options in a running config.

Josef Bacik (1) commits (+2/-1):
Btrfs: don't panic if we get an error while balancing V2

David Sterba (1) commits (+11/-0):
btrfs: add missing options displayed in mount output

Miao Xie (1) commits (+7/-5):
btrfs: fix oops when doing space balance

Total: (3) commits (+20/-6)

 fs/btrfs/ctree.h   |    5 +++++
 fs/btrfs/inode.c   |   12 +++++++-----
 fs/btrfs/super.c   |    6 ++++++
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |    3 ++-
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Chris Mason

Hi everyone,

The for-linus branch of the btrfs-unstable repo:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git for-linus

Quoted 8 lines

Has three more fixes. We're fixing oopsen during space balancing (btrfs filesystem balance /mnt)) and during device removal.

Dave Sterba also sent in a patch to make /proc/mounts properly match a few new mount options, which he (correctly I think) considers a regression fix because it makes it hard for testers/users to verify the options in a running config.

Hi Chris,

Maybe, any development regarding to the "[BUG] Btrfs: Corrupted root filesystem" subjected bug posted by me ?

Tarkan