Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "futex: Fix uninterruptible loop due to gate_area" has been added to the 3.0-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jan 3, 2012 Stable branch

lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

futex: Fix uninterruptible loop due to gate_area

to the 3.0-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
futex-fix-uninterruptible-loop-due-to-gate_area.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From e6780f7243eddb133cc20ec37fa69317c218b709 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 11:44:01 -0800
Subject: futex: Fix uninterruptible loop due to gate_area

From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

commit e6780f7243eddb133cc20ec37fa69317c218b709 upstream.

It was found (by Sasha) that if you use a futex located in the gate area we get stuck in an uninterruptible infinite loop, much like the ZERO_PAGE issue.

While looking at this problem, PeterZ realized you'll get into similar trouble when hitting any install_special_pages() mapping. And are there still drivers setting up their own special mmaps without page->mapping, and without special VM or pte flags to make get_user_pages fail?

In most cases, if page->mapping is NULL, we do not need to retry at all:
Linus points out that even /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches poses no problem, because it ends up using remove_mapping(), which takes care not to interfere when the page reference count is raised.

But there is still one case which does need a retry: if memory pressure called shmem_writepage in between get_user_pages_fast dropping page table lock and our acquiring page lock, then the page gets switched from filecache to swapcache (and ->mapping set to NULL) whatever the refcount. Fault it back in to get the page->mapping needed for key->shared.inode.

---
 kernel/futex.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel/futex.c +20 -8
@@ -314,17 +314,29 @@ again:
 #endif
 
 	lock_page(page_head);
+
+	/*
+	 * If page_head->mapping is NULL, then it cannot be a PageAnon
+	 * page; but it might be the ZERO_PAGE or in the gate area or
+	 * in a special mapping (all cases which we are happy to fail);
+	 * or it may have been a good file page when get_user_pages_fast
+	 * found it, but truncated or holepunched or subjected to
+	 * invalidate_complete_page2 before we got the page lock (also
+	 * cases which we are happy to fail).  And we hold a reference,
+	 * so refcount care in invalidate_complete_page's remove_mapping
+	 * prevents drop_caches from setting mapping to NULL beneath us.
+	 *
+	 * The case we do have to guard against is when memory pressure made
+	 * shmem_writepage move it from filecache to swapcache beneath us:
+	 * an unlikely race, but we do need to retry for page_head->mapping.
+	 */
 	if (!page_head->mapping) {
+		int shmem_swizzled = PageSwapCache(page_head);
 		unlock_page(page_head);
 		put_page(page_head);
-		/*
-		* ZERO_PAGE pages don't have a mapping. Avoid a busy loop
-		* trying to find one. RW mapping would have COW'd (and thus
-		* have a mapping) so this page is RO and won't ever change.
-		*/
-		if ((page_head == ZERO_PAGE(address)))
-			return -EFAULT;
-		goto again;
+		if (shmem_swizzled)
+			goto again;
+		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
 	/*

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-3.0/memcg-keep-root-group-unchanged-if-creation-fails.patch queue-3.0/vfs-__read_cache_page-should-use-gfp-argument-rather-than-gfp_kernel.patch queue-3.0/futex-fix-uninterruptible-loop-due-to-gate_area.patch