Skip to contentSkip to conversation

pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: free allocated pinctrl_map structure only once and use kernel facilities for IMX_PMX_DUMP

PATCH In review Devendra Naga 2 participants 5 messages Jun 8, 2012 – Jun 12, 2012

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: free allocated pinctrl_map structure only once and use kernel facilities for IMX_PMX_DUMP

a) as we allocate the pinctrl_map structure at imx_dt_node_to_map at line 167, anyway if its an element, or a num_elements * (sizeof(type)) elements allocated to one single pointer must be freed only once.

CASE. A)

as new_map is not moved and allocated like,

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
    new_map[i] = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL);
}

its freed as

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
    kfree(new_map[i]);
}

CASE. B)
and its allocated like

        new_map = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL);

it just needs kfree not as case A's.

b) use KERN_DEBUG facility for the IMX_PMX_DUMP macro.

---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c |   28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c +12 -16
index f6e7c67..09f3a30 100644
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@
 #include "core.h"
 #include "pinctrl-imx.h"
 
-#define IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, p, m, c, n)		\
-{						\
-	int i, j;				\
-	printk("Format: Pin Mux Config\n");	\
-	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {		\
-		j = p[i];			\
-		printk("%s %d 0x%lx\n",		\
-			info->pins[j].name,	\
-			m[i], c[i]);		\
-	}					\
+#define IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, p, m, c, n)			\
+{							\
+	int i, j;					\
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "Format: Pin Mux Config\n");	\
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {			\
+		j = p[i];				\
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s %d 0x%lx\n",	\
+			info->pins[j].name,		\
+			m[i], c[i]);			\
+	}						\
 }
 
 /* The bits in CONFIG cell defined in binding doc*/
@@ -201,10 +201,7 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 static void imx_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 				struct pinctrl_map *map, unsigned num_maps)
 {
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < num_maps; i++)
-		kfree(map);
+	kfree(map);
 }
 
 static struct pinctrl_ops imx_pctrl_ops = {
@@ -475,9 +472,8 @@ static int __devinit imx_pinctrl_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
 		grp->configs[j] = config & ~IMX_PAD_SION;
 	}
 
-#ifdef DEBUG
 	IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, grp->pins, grp->mux_mode, grp->configs, grp->npins);
-#endif
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
#1 lore raw

Hi Dong, Linus,

i sent a second patch previously which applies actually on top this patch , so not sending it.

You want me to send it again?

Thanks,
Devendra.

Quoted 89 lines · Devendra Naga

a) as we allocate the pinctrl_map structure at imx_dt_node_to_map at  line 167, anyway if its an element, or a num_elements * (sizeof(type)) elements allocated to one single pointer must be freed only once.

CASE. A)

as new_map is not moved and allocated like,

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
   new_map[i] = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL); }

its freed as

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
   kfree(new_map[i]);
}

CASE. B)
and its allocated like
       new_map = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL);

it just needs kfree not as case A's.

b) use KERN_DEBUG facility for the IMX_PMX_DUMP macro.

---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c |   28 ++++++++++++----------------

 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-imx.c +12 -17
index f6e7c67..09f3a30 100644
@@ -27,16 +27,16 @@
  #include "core.h"
  #include "pinctrl-imx.h"
 
-#define IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, p, m, c, n)         \
-{                                              \
-       int i, j;                               \
-       printk("Format: Pin Mux Config\n");     \
-       for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {               \
-               j = p[i];                       \
-               printk("%s %d 0x%lx\n",         \
-                       info->pins[j].name,     \
-                       m[i], c[i]);            \
-       }                                       \
+#define IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, p, m, c, n)                 \
+{                                                      \
+       int i, j;                                       \
+       printk(KERN_DEBUG "Format: Pin Mux Config\n");  \
+       for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {                       \
+               j = p[i];                               \
+               printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s %d 0x%lx\n",      \
+                       info->pins[j].name,             \
+                       m[i], c[i]);                    \
+       }                                               \
  }
 
  /* The bits in CONFIG cell defined in binding doc*/
@@ -201,10 +201,7 @@ static int imx_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
  static void imx_dt_free_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
                                struct pinctrl_map *map, unsigned num_maps)
  {
-       int i;
-
-       for (i = 0; i < num_maps; i++)
-               kfree(map);
+       kfree(map);
  }
 
  static struct pinctrl_ops imx_pctrl_ops = {
@@ -475,9 +472,8 @@ static int __devinit imx_pinctrl_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
                grp->configs[j] = config & ~IMX_PAD_SION;
        }
 
-#ifdef DEBUG
        IMX_PMX_DUMP(info, grp->pins, grp->mux_mode, grp->configs, grp->npins);
-#endif
+
        return 0;
  }
 
--

1.7.9.5

#2 lore raw
In reply to Devendra Naga
Quoted 22 lines · Devendra Naga

a) as we allocate the pinctrl_map structure at imx_dt_node_to_map at  line 167, anyway if its an element, or a num_elements * (sizeof(type)) elements allocated to one single pointer must be freed only once.

CASE. A)

as new_map is not moved and allocated like,

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
   new_map[i] = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL); }

its freed as

for (i = 0; i < MAX_ELEMS; i++) {
   kfree(new_map[i]);
}

CASE. B)
and its allocated like
       new_map = kmalloc(numelems * size, GFP_KERNEL);

Quoted 6 lines

it just needs kfree not as case A's.

b) use KERN_DEBUG facility for the IMX_PMX_DUMP macro.

OK I applied this, which I *think* is the last version of the patch, please double-check that the right one is in my git.

This was send the 9th but not tagged v3 so I was a bit confused...

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#3 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 2 lines

OK I applied this, which I *think* is the last version of the patch, please double-check that the right one is in my git.

Yeah correct This is the Latest one.
Thanks for taking this in.

Quoted 2 lines

This was send the 9th but not tagged v3 so I was a bit confused...

Sorry for not changing the subject to V3 for this.

so for every review, do we need to increment version count of the patch?

Quoted 2 lines

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#4 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · devendra.aaru

so for every review, do we need to increment version count of the patch?

No, just make sure I can understand which is the latest one... any way you want :-)

Linus Walleij