Btrfs: optimize function btrfs_read_chunk_tree
PATCH 1/1 Btrfs: optimize function btrfs_read_chunk_tree
After reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find the chunk items. Instead, if while reading the device items we find a chunk item in the leaf keep iterating over the leaf and process the chunk items - at the moment chunk items always follow immediately the device items in the chunk tree, and if this fact changes in the future, revert back to previous behaviour of exiting the loop and navigate down the tree again to search for chunk items, but use BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID as the object id for the search key, as any chunk item has a key that has this object id.
--- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +7 -2
@@ -5668,8 +5668,13 @@ again: }btrfs_item_key_to_cpu (leaf, &found_key, slot);if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { -if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) +if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { +if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY ) { + key.objectid = found_key.objectid; +continue ; + }break ; + }if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) {struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; dev_item = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot,
@@ -5688,7 +5693,7 @@ again: path->slots[0 ]++; }if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { - key.objectid =0 ; + key.objectid =BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID ;btrfs_release_path (path); goto again; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH v2 1/1 Btrfs: optimize function btrfs_read_chunk_tree
After reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find the chunk items. Instead just read all device items and chunk items with a single tree search. This is possible because all device items are found before any chunk item in the chunks tree.
---
V2: Simplified logic inside the loop
(suggested by Josef Bacik on irc).
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 30 ++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +10 -20
@@ -5676,14 +5676,13 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_root *root)mutex_lock (&uuid_mutex);lock_chunks (root); -/* first we search for all of the device items, and then we -* read in all of the chunk items. This way we can create chunk -* mappings that reference all of the devices that are afound -*/ +/* Read all device items, and then all the chunk items. All +device items are found before any chunk item (their object id +is smaller than the lowest possible object id for a chunk +item - BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID). */ key.objectid =BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ; key.offset =0 ; key.type =0 ; -again: ret =btrfs_search_slot (NULL , root, &key, path,0 ,0 );if (ret <0 ) goto error;
@@ -5699,17 +5698,13 @@ again:break ; }btrfs_item_key_to_cpu (leaf, &found_key, slot); -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { -if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) -break ; -if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { -struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; - dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, +if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { +struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; + dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item); - ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); -if (ret) - goto error; - } + ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); +if (ret) + goto error; }else if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY ) {struct btrfs_chunk *chunk; chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
@@ -5719,11 +5714,6 @@ again: } path->slots[0 ]++; } -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { - key.objectid =0 ; -btrfs_release_path (path); - goto again; - } ret =0 ; error:unlock_chunks (root);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 22 lines · Filipe David Borba Manana
After reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find the chunk items. Instead just read all device items and chunk items with a single tree search. This is possible because all device items are found before any chunk item in the chunks tree.
Signed-off-by Filipe David Borba Manana <[email protected]>---
V2: Simplified logic inside the loop
(suggested by Josef Bacik on irc).fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 30 ++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/volumes.c +0
-0@@ -5676,14 +5676,13 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_root *root)mutex_lock (&uuid_mutex);
fs/btrfs/volumes.c int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_root *root) · line 5682
Quoted 10 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +4
-4lock_chunks (root); -/* first we search for all of the device items, and then we -* read in all of the chunk items. This way we can create chunk -* mappings that reference all of the devices that are afound -*/ +/* Read all device items, and then all the chunk items. All +device items are found before any chunk item (their object id +is smaller than the lowest possible object id for a chunk +item - BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID). */
According to the coding style of the kernel(Documentation/CodingStyle), the preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
/*
* This is the preferred style for multi-line
* comments in the Linux kernel source code.
*
* Description: A column of asterisks on the left side,
* with beginning and ending almost-blank lines. */
The other code is OK.
Quoted 44 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +6
-16key.objectid =BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ; key.offset =0 ; key.type =0 ; -again: ret =btrfs_search_slot (NULL , root, &key, path,0 ,0 );if (ret <0 ) goto error;@@ -5699,17 +5698,13 @@ again:break ; }btrfs_item_key_to_cpu (leaf, &found_key, slot); -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { -if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) -break ; -if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { -struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; - dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, +if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { +struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; + dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item); - ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); -if (ret) - goto error; - } + ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); +if (ret) + goto error; }else if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY ) {struct btrfs_chunk *chunk; chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);@@ -5719,11 +5714,6 @@ again: } path->slots[0 ]++; } -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { - key.objectid =0 ; -btrfs_release_path (path); - goto again; - } ret =0 ; error:unlock_chunks (root);
PATCH v3 1/1 Btrfs: optimize function btrfs_read_chunk_tree
In reply to Filipe David Borba MananaAfter reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find the chunk items. Instead just read all device items and chunk items with a single tree search. This is possible because all device items are found before any chunk item in the chunks tree.
---
V2: Simplified logic inside the loop
(suggested by Josef Bacik on irc).
V3: Updated comment to comply with kernel coding style.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 30 +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/volumes.c +11 -19
@@ -5676,14 +5676,15 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_root *root)mutex_lock (&uuid_mutex);lock_chunks (root); -/* first we search for all of the device items, and then we -* read in all of the chunk items. This way we can create chunk -* mappings that reference all of the devices that are afound +/* +* Read all device items, and then all the chunk items. All +* device items are found before any chunk item (their object id +* is smaller than the lowest possible object id for a chunk +* item - BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID). */ key.objectid =BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ; key.offset =0 ; key.type =0 ; -again: ret =btrfs_search_slot (NULL , root, &key, path,0 ,0 );if (ret <0 ) goto error;
@@ -5699,17 +5700,13 @@ again:break ; }btrfs_item_key_to_cpu (leaf, &found_key, slot); -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { -if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) -break ; -if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { -struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; - dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, +if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { +struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; + dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item); - ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); -if (ret) - goto error; - } + ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); +if (ret) + goto error; }else if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY ) {struct btrfs_chunk *chunk; chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
@@ -5719,11 +5716,6 @@ again: } path->slots[0 ]++; } -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { - key.objectid =0 ; -btrfs_release_path (path); - goto again; - } ret =0 ; error:unlock_chunks (root);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 7 lines · Filipe David Borba Manana
After reading all device items from the chunk tree, don't exit the loop and then navigate down the tree again to find the chunk items. Instead just read all device items and chunk items with a single tree search. This is possible because all device items are found before any chunk item in the chunks tree.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Filipe David Borba Manana <[email protected]>---
V2: Simplified logic inside the loop
(suggested by Josef Bacik on irc).
V3: Updated comment to comply with kernel coding style.
Quoted 65 lines
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 30 +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)fs/btrfs/volumes.c +11
-19@@ -5676,14 +5676,15 @@ int btrfs_read_chunk_tree(struct btrfs_root *root)mutex_lock (&uuid_mutex);lock_chunks (root); -/* first we search for all of the device items, and then we -* read in all of the chunk items. This way we can create chunk -* mappings that reference all of the devices that are afound +/* +* Read all device items, and then all the chunk items. All +* device items are found before any chunk item (their object id +* is smaller than the lowest possible object id for a chunk +* item - BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID). */ key.objectid =BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ; key.offset =0 ; key.type =0 ; -again: ret =btrfs_search_slot (NULL , root, &key, path,0 ,0 );if (ret <0 ) goto error;@@ -5699,17 +5700,13 @@ again:break ; }btrfs_item_key_to_cpu (leaf, &found_key, slot); -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { -if (found_key.objectid !=BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) -break ; -if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { -struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; - dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, +if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY ) { +struct btrfs_dev_item *dev_item; + dev_item =btrfs_item_ptr (leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dev_item); - ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); -if (ret) - goto error; - } + ret =read_one_dev (root, leaf, dev_item); +if (ret) + goto error; }else if (found_key.type ==BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY ) {struct btrfs_chunk *chunk; chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);@@ -5719,11 +5716,6 @@ again: } path->slots[0 ]++; } -if (key.objectid ==BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID ) { - key.objectid =0 ; -btrfs_release_path (path); - goto again; - } ret =0 ; error:unlock_chunks (root);