ext4 fixes for BE machine
cover ext4 fixes for BE machine
I just copied the patch provided by Rommel and tested reading an ext4 on avr32 machine. List content and read data from it worked, but I can't say anything about ext4write which Rommel says to fix with that patch.
@sjg: We should add Series-notes switch to avoid cover letter for single patch submission ...
Rommel Custodio (1):
ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
fs/ext4/ext4_common.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
From: Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>
Fix reading ext4_extent_header struture on BE machines.
Some 16 bit fields where converted to 32 bit fields, due to the byte swap on BE machines the containing value was corrupted. Therefore reading ext4 filesystems on BE machines where broken before.
--- fs/ext4/ext4_common.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +6 -6
@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static struct ext4_extent_header *ext4fs_get_extent_blockwhile (1 ) { index = (struct ext4_extent_idx *)(ext_block +1 ); -if (le32_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_magic) !=EXT4_EXT_MAGIC ) +if (le16_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_magic) !=EXT4_EXT_MAGIC )return 0 ;if (ext_block->eh_depth ==0 )
@@ -1440,14 +1440,14 @@ static struct ext4_extent_header *ext4fs_get_extent_block i =-1 ;do { i++; -if (i >=le32_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries)) +if (i >=le16_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries))break ; }while (fileblock >le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_block));if (--i <0 )return 0 ; - block =le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_hi); + block =le16_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_hi); block = (block <<32 ) +le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_lo); if (ext4fs_devread((lbaint_t)block << log2_blksz, 0, fs->blksz,
@@ -1548,17 +1548,17 @@ long int read_allocated_block(struct ext2_inode *inode, int fileblock)do { i++; -if (i >=le32_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries)) +if (i >=le16_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries))break ; }while (fileblock >=le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_block));if (--i >=0 ) { fileblock -=le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_block); -if (fileblock >=le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_len)) { +if (fileblock >=le16_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_len)) {free (buf);return 0 ; } - start =le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_hi); + start =le16_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_hi); start = (start <<32 ) +le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_lo);free (buf);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
Hi Andreas,
Quoted 9 lines · Andreas Bie?mann
From: Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>
Fix reading
ext4_extent_headerstruture on BE machines.
Some 16 bit fields where converted to 32 bit fields, due to the byte swap on BE
machines the containing value was corrupted. Therefore reading ext4 filesystems
on BE machines where broken before.
Quoted 4 lines
Signed-off-by Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>[sent via git-send-email; rework commit message]Signed-off-by Andreas Bie?mann <[email protected]>
I tested it on sandbox with the sandbox block patch (not yet merged). It worked fine with my simple test (loading a kernel and a 70MB executable) with and without this patch unfortunately, but anyway:
PATCH 1/1 ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
In reply to Andreas BießmannOn Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:53:25 +0200 Andreas Bie?mann andreas.devel at googlemail.com wrote,
Hi Andreas,
Quoted 60 lines
From: Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>
Fix reading
ext4_extent_headerstruture on BE machines. Some 16 bit fields where converted to 32 bit fields, due to the byte swap on BE machines the containing value was corrupted. Therefore reading ext4 filesystems on BE machines where broken before.Signed-off-by Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>[sent via git-send-email; rework commit message]Signed-off-by Andreas Bie?mann <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/ext4_common.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +1
-1@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static struct ext4_extent_header *ext4fs_get_extent_block while (1) { index = (struct ext4_extent_idx *)(ext_block +1 ); -if (le32_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_magic) != EXT4_EXT_MAGIC) +if (le16_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_magic) !=EXT4_EXT_MAGIC )return 0 ;fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +2
-2if (ext_block->eh_depth ==0 )@@ -1440,14 +1440,14 @@ static struct ext4_extent_header *ext4fs_get_extent_block i = -1;do { i++; -if (i >=le32_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries)) +if (i >=le16_to_cpu (ext_block->eh_entries))break ; }while (fileblock >le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_block));if (--i <0 )return 0 ; - block =le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_hi); + block =le16_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_hi); block = (block <<32 ) +le32_to_cpu (index[i].ei_leaf_lo); if (ext4fs_devread((lbaint_t)block << log2_blksz, 0,
fs->blksz, @@ -1548,17 +1548,17 @@ long intread_allocated_block(struct ext2_inode *inode, int fileblock)fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +1
-1do { i++; - if (i >= le32_to_cpu(ext_block->eh_entries)) + if (i >= le16_to_cpu(ext_block->eh_entries)) break; } while (fileblock >=
le32_to_cpu(extent[i].ee_block)); if (--i >= 0) {fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +0
-1fileblock -=le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_block); - if (fileblock >=
le32_to_cpu(extent[i].ee_len)) {fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +1
-0+ if (fileblock >=
le16_to_cpu(extent[i].ee_len)) { free(buf);
fs/ext4/ext4_common.c long int read_allocated_block(struct ext2_inode *inode, int fileblock) · line 1564
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/ext4_common.c +1
-1return 0 ; } - start =le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_hi); + start =le16_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_hi); start = (start <<32 ) +le32_to_cpu (extent[i].ee_start_lo);free (buf);
I've tested this patch at LE Samsung Trats board. The code worked as before (ext4ls, ext4load, ext4write) - also taking into account limitation of our platform.
However, we will not run out from refactoring this code.
Signature · 5 lines
Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
PATCH 1/1 ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
Hi Lukasz,
Quoted 2 lines · Lukasz Majewski
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:53:25 +0200 Andreas Bie?mann andreas.devel at googlemail.com wrote,
<snip>
Quoted 3 lines
I've tested this patch at LE Samsung Trats board. The code worked as before (ext4ls, ext4load, ext4write) - also taking into account limitation of our platform.
I'm glad to hear that your proposed unaligned access problems not apply.
Quoted 1 line
However, we will not run out from refactoring this code.
I'm fine with that for later releases, this fix should go into 2013.07.
Best regards,
Andreas Bie?mann
[U-Boot] ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field
In reply to Andreas BießmannQuoted 7 lines · Andreas Bie??mann
From: Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>
Fix reading
ext4_extent_headerstruture on BE machines. Some 16 bit fields where converted to 32 bit fields, due to the byte swap on BE machines the containing value was corrupted. Therefore reading ext4 filesystems on BE machines where broken before.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Rommel Custodio <[email protected]>[sent via git-send-email; rework commit message]Signed-off-by Andreas Bie??mann <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Tested-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>Tested-by Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]>
So I gave the changes a review myself based on how the kernel accesses these fields and agree the changes are correct. I also did a quick test on beaglebone black and was able to read (and confirmed crc32) a few files correctly still. Applied to u-boot/master with a re-wrapping of the commit message, thanks!
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130722/3f2ba1b3/attachment.pgp>
cover ext4 fixes for BE machine
In reply to Andreas BießmannHi Andreas,
Quoted 9 lines · Andreas Bie?mann
I just copied the patch provided by Rommel and tested reading an ext4 on avr32
machine. List content and read data from it worked, but I can't say anything
about ext4write which Rommel says to fix with that patch.@sjg: We should add Series-notes switch to avoid cover letter for single patch submission ...
Yes agreed, There is Series-notes, but it's not quite what you want, I think.
Regards,
Simon
cover ext4 fixes for BE machine
In reply to Andreas BießmannDear Andreas Bie?mann
Quoted 3 lines · Andreas Bie?mann
I just copied the patch provided by Rommel and tested reading an ext4 on avr32 machine. List content and read data from it worked, but I can't say anything about ext4write which Rommel says to fix with that patch.
Thanks for update.
This patch doesn't fix ext4write in BE. It just correctly accesses the ext3/ext4 formatted partition so that ext4ls/ext4load can work correctly.
I'm still checking. I'll submit a patch when I got it working.
Thank you.
Quoted 17 lines
@sjg: We should add Series-notes switch to avoid cover letter for single patch submission ...
Rommel Custodio (1):
ext4fs:le32_to_cpu()used on a 16-bit fieldfs/ext4/ext4_common.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)Signature · 6 lines
1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot at lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot