kvm-unit-tests: Add a series of test cases
v2 cover kvm-unit-tests: Add a series of test cases
Add a series of test cases for nested VMX in kvm-unit-tests.
Arthur Chunqi Li (4):
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interception
lib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 20 +- x86/vmx_tests.c | 714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 736 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH v2 1/4 kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
Add test cases for ENT_LOAD_PAT, ENT_LOAD_EFER, EXI_LOAD_PAT, EXI_SAVE_PAT, EXI_LOAD_EFER, EXI_SAVE_PAT flags in enter/exit control fields.
--- x86/vmx.h | 7 +++ x86/vmx_tests.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+)
x86/vmx.h +7 -0
@@ -152,10 +152,12 @@ enum Encoding {GUEST_DEBUGCTL =0x2802ul ,GUEST_DEBUGCTL_HI =0x2803ul ,GUEST_EFER =0x2806ul , +GUEST_PAT =0x2804ul ,GUEST_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL =0x2808ul ,GUEST_PDPTE =0x280aul ,/* 64-Bit Host State */ +HOST_PAT =0x2c00ul ,HOST_EFER =0x2c02ul , HOST_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL = 0x2c04ul,
@@ -330,11 +332,15 @@ enum Ctrl_exi {EXI_HOST_64 =1UL <<9 ,EXI_LOAD_PERF =1UL <<12 ,EXI_INTA =1UL <<15 , +EXI_SAVE_PAT =1UL <<18 , +EXI_LOAD_PAT =1UL <<19 , +EXI_SAVE_EFER =1UL <<20 , EXI_LOAD_EFER = 1UL << 21, };enum Ctrl_ent {ENT_GUEST_64 =1UL <<9 , +ENT_LOAD_PAT =1UL <<14 ,ENT_LOAD_EFER =1UL <<15 , };
@@ -354,6 +360,7 @@ enum Ctrl0 {CPU_NMI_WINDOW =1ul <<22 ,CPU_IO =1ul <<24 ,CPU_IO_BITMAP =1ul <<25 , +CPU_MSR_BITMAP =1ul <<28 , CPU_SECONDARY = 1ul << 31, };
x86/vmx_tests.c +185 -0
200 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH v2 2/4 kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
In reply to Arthur Chunqi LiAdd testing for CR0/4 shadowing. Two types of flags in CR0/4 are
tested: flags owned and shadowed by L1. They are treated differently in KVM. We test one flag of both types in CR0 (TS and MP) and CR4 (DE and TSD) with read through, read shadow, write through, write shadow (same as and different from shadowed value).
--- lib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx_tests.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
lib/x86/vm.h +4 -0
@@ -17,9 +17,13 @@#define PTE_ADDR (0xffffffffff000ull)#define X86_CR0_PE 0x00000001 +#define X86_CR0_MP 0x00000002 +#define X86_CR0_TS 0x00000008#define X86_CR0_WP 0x00010000#define X86_CR0_PG 0x80000000#define X86_CR4_VMXE 0x00000001 +#define X86_CR4_TSD 0x00000004 +#define X86_CR4_DE 0x00000008#define X86_CR4_PSE 0x00000010#define X86_CR4_PAE 0x00000020#define X86_CR4_PCIDE 0x00020000
x86/vmx_tests.c +218 -0
241 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
Il 15/08/2013 13:45, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
Quoted 247 lines
Add testing for CR0/4 shadowing. Two types of flags in CR0/4 are
tested: flags owned and shadowed by L1. They are treated differently in KVM. We test one flag of both types in CR0 (TS and MP) and CR4 (DE and TSD) with read through, read shadow, write through, write shadow (same as and different from shadowed value).Signed-off-by Arthur Chunqi Li <[email protected]>--- lib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx_tests.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+)lib/x86/vm.h +4
-0@@ -17,9 +17,13 @@#define PTE_ADDR (0xffffffffff000ull)#define X86_CR0_PE 0x00000001 +#define X86_CR0_MP 0x00000002 +#define X86_CR0_TS 0x00000008#define X86_CR0_WP 0x00010000#define X86_CR0_PG 0x80000000#define X86_CR4_VMXE 0x00000001 +#define X86_CR4_TSD 0x00000004 +#define X86_CR4_DE 0x00000008#define X86_CR4_PSE 0x00000010#define X86_CR4_PAE 0x00000020#define X86_CR4_PCIDE 0x00020000x86/vmx_tests.c +196
-0@@ -5,12 +5,20 @@u64 ia32_pat;u64 ia32_efer; +volatile u32 stage;static inline void vmcall () { asmvolatile ("vmcall" ); } +static inline void set_stage (u32 s) +{ +barrier (); + stage = s; +barrier (); +} +void basic_init () { }@@ -257,6 +265,214 @@ static int test_ctrl_efer_exit_handler()return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT ; } +u32 guest_cr0, guest_cr4; + +static void cr_shadowing_main () +{ +u32 cr0, cr4, tmp; + +// Test read through +set_stage (0 ); + guest_cr0 =read_cr0 (); +if (stage ==1 ) +report ("Read through CR0" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +set_stage (1 ); + guest_cr4 =read_cr4 (); +if (stage ==2 ) +report ("Read through CR4" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +// Test write through + guest_cr0 = guest_cr0 ^ (X86_CR0_TS |X86_CR0_MP ); + guest_cr4 = guest_cr4 ^ (X86_CR4_TSD |X86_CR4_DE ); +set_stage (2 ); +write_cr0 (guest_cr0); +if (stage ==3 ) +report ("Write throuth CR0" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +set_stage (3 ); +write_cr4 (guest_cr4); +if (stage ==4 ) +report ("Write through CR4" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +// Test read shadow +set_stage (4 ); +vmcall (); + cr0 =read_cr0 (); +if (stage !=5 ) { +if (cr0 == guest_cr0) +report ("Read shadowing CR0" ,1 ); +else +report ("Read shadowing CR0" ,0 ); + } +set_stage (5 ); + cr4 =read_cr4 (); +if (stage !=6 ) { +if (cr4 == guest_cr4) +report ("Read shadowing CR4" ,1 ); +else +report ("Read shadowing CR4" ,0 ); + } +// Test write shadow (same value with shadow) +set_stage (6 ); +write_cr0 (guest_cr0); +if (stage ==7 ) +report ("Write shadowing CR0 (same value with shadow)" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +set_stage (7 ); +write_cr4 (guest_cr4); +if (stage ==8 ) +report ("Write shadowing CR4 (same value with shadow)" ,0 ); +else +vmcall (); +// Test write shadow (different value) +set_stage (8 ); + tmp = guest_cr0 ^X86_CR0_TS ; + asmvolatile ("mov %0, %%rsi\n\t" +"mov %%rsi, %%cr0\n\t" + ::"m" (tmp) + :"rsi" ,"memory" ,"cc" ); +if (stage !=9 ) +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR0_TS" ,0 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR0_TS" ,1 ); +set_stage (9 ); + tmp = guest_cr0 ^X86_CR0_MP ; + asmvolatile ("mov %0, %%rsi\n\t" +"mov %%rsi, %%cr0\n\t" + ::"m" (tmp) + :"rsi" ,"memory" ,"cc" ); +if (stage !=10 ) +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR0_MP" ,0 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR0_MP" ,1 ); +set_stage (10 ); + tmp = guest_cr4 ^X86_CR4_TSD ; + asmvolatile ("mov %0, %%rsi\n\t" +"mov %%rsi, %%cr4\n\t" + ::"m" (tmp) + :"rsi" ,"memory" ,"cc" ); +if (stage !=11 ) +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR4_TSD" ,0 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR4_TSD" ,1 ); +set_stage (11 ); + tmp = guest_cr4 ^X86_CR4_DE ; + asmvolatile ("mov %0, %%rsi\n\t" +"mov %%rsi, %%cr4\n\t" + ::"m" (tmp) + :"rsi" ,"memory" ,"cc" ); +if (stage !=12 ) +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR4_DE" ,0 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing different X86_CR4_DE" ,1 ); +} + +static int cr_shadowing_exit_handler () +{ +u64 guest_rip; +ulong reason; +u32 insn_len; +u32 exit_qual; + + guest_rip =vmcs_read (GUEST_RIP ); + reason =vmcs_read (EXI_REASON ) &0xff ; + insn_len =vmcs_read (EXI_INST_LEN ); + exit_qual =vmcs_read (EXI_QUALIFICATION ); +switch (reason) { +case VMX_VMCALL : +switch (stage) { +case 0 : +if (guest_cr0 ==vmcs_read (GUEST_CR0 )) +report ("Read through CR0" ,1 ); +else +report ("Read through CR0" ,0 ); +break ; +case 1 : +if (guest_cr4 ==vmcs_read (GUEST_CR4 )) +report ("Read through CR4" ,1 ); +else +report ("Read through CR4" ,0 ); +break ; +case 2 : +if (guest_cr0 ==vmcs_read (GUEST_CR0 )) +report ("Write through CR0" ,1 ); +else +report ("Write through CR0" ,0 ); +break ; +case 3 : +if (guest_cr4 ==vmcs_read (GUEST_CR4 )) +report ("Write through CR4" ,1 ); +else +report ("Write through CR4" ,0 ); +break ; +case 4 : + guest_cr0 =vmcs_read (GUEST_CR0 ) ^ (X86_CR0_TS |X86_CR0_MP ); + guest_cr4 =vmcs_read (GUEST_CR4 ) ^ (X86_CR4_TSD |X86_CR4_DE ); +vmcs_write (CR0_MASK ,X86_CR0_TS |X86_CR0_MP ); +vmcs_write (CR0_READ_SHADOW , guest_cr0 & (X86_CR0_TS |X86_CR0_MP )); +vmcs_write (CR4_MASK ,X86_CR4_TSD |X86_CR4_DE ); +vmcs_write (CR4_READ_SHADOW , guest_cr4 & (X86_CR4_TSD |X86_CR4_DE )); +break ; +case 6 : +if (guest_cr0 == (vmcs_read (GUEST_CR0 ) ^ (X86_CR0_TS |X86_CR0_MP ))) +report ("Write shadowing CR0 (same value)" ,1 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing CR0 (same value)" ,0 ); +break ; +case 7 : +if (guest_cr4 == (vmcs_read (GUEST_CR4 ) ^ (X86_CR4_TSD |X86_CR4_DE ))) +report ("Write shadowing CR4 (same value)" ,1 ); +else +report ("Write shadowing CR4 (same value)" ,0 ); +break ; + } +vmcs_write (GUEST_RIP , guest_rip + insn_len); +return VMX_TEST_RESUME ; +case VMX_CR : +switch (stage) { +case 4 : +report ("Read shadowing CR0" ,0 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 5 : +report ("Read shadowing CR4" ,0 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 6 : +report ("Write shadowing CR0 (same value)" ,0 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 7 : +report ("Write shadowing CR4 (same value)" ,0 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 8 :
x86/vmx_tests.c static int test_ctrl_efer_exit_handler() · line 465
Quoted 10 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +10
-0+case 9 : +// 0x600 encodes "mov %esi, %cr0" +if (exit_qual ==0x600 ) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 10 : +case 11 : +// 0x604 encodes "mov %esi, %cr4" +if (exit_qual ==0x604 ) +set_stage (stage +1 );
Better put a "break;" here, I can do that when applying.
Otherwise the diff from v1 looks good.
Paolo
PATCH v2 3/4 kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
In reply to Arthur Chunqi LiAdd test cases for I/O bitmaps, including corner cases.
Test includes: pass & trap, in & out, different I/O width, low & high I/O bitmap, partial I/O pass, overrun (inl 0xFFFF).
--- x86/vmx.h | 6 +-- x86/vmx_tests.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
x86/vmx.h +3 -3
@@ -417,15 +417,15 @@ enum Ctrl1 { "popf\n\t"#define VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK 0x7 -#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 1 -#define _VMX_IO_WORD 2 +#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 0 +#define _VMX_IO_WORD 1#define _VMX_IO_LONG 3#define VMX_IO_DIRECTION_MASK (1ul << 3)#define VMX_IO_IN (1ul << 3)#define VMX_IO_OUT 0#define VMX_IO_STRING (1ul << 4)#define VMX_IO_REP (1ul << 5) -#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_DX (1ul << 6) +#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_IMM (1ul << 6)#define VMX_IO_PORT_MASK 0xFFFF0000#define VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT 16
x86/vmx_tests.c +159 -0
180 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
Il 15/08/2013 13:45, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
Quoted 186 lines
Add test cases for I/O bitmaps, including corner cases.
Test includes: pass & trap, in & out, different I/O width, low & high I/O bitmap, partial I/O pass, overrun (inl
0xFFFF).Signed-off-by Arthur Chunqi Li <[email protected]>--- x86/vmx.h | 6 +-- x86/vmx_tests.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)x86/vmx.h +3
-3@@ -417,15 +417,15 @@ enum Ctrl1 { "popf\n\t"#define VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK 0x7 -#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 1 -#define _VMX_IO_WORD 2 +#define _VMX_IO_BYTE 0 +#define _VMX_IO_WORD 1#define _VMX_IO_LONG 3#define VMX_IO_DIRECTION_MASK (1ul << 3)#define VMX_IO_IN (1ul << 3)#define VMX_IO_OUT 0#define VMX_IO_STRING (1ul << 4)#define VMX_IO_REP (1ul << 5) -#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_DX (1ul << 6) +#define VMX_IO_OPRAND_IMM (1ul << 6)#define VMX_IO_PORT_MASK 0xFFFF0000#define VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT 16x86/vmx_tests.c +133
-0@@ -2,10 +2,13 @@#include "msr.h" #include "processor.h" #include "vm.h" +#include "io.h" u64 ia32_pat;u64 ia32_efer;volatile u32 stage; +void *io_bitmap_a, *io_bitmap_b; +u16 ioport;static inline void vmcall () {@@ -473,6 +476,160 @@ static int cr_shadowing_exit_handler()return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT ; } +static void iobmp_init () +{ +u32 ctrl_cpu0; + + io_bitmap_a =alloc_page (); + io_bitmap_a =alloc_page (); +memset (io_bitmap_a,0x0 ,PAGE_SIZE ); +memset (io_bitmap_b,0x0 ,PAGE_SIZE ); + ctrl_cpu0 =vmcs_read (CPU_EXEC_CTRL0 ); + ctrl_cpu0 |=CPU_IO_BITMAP ; + ctrl_cpu0 &= (~CPU_IO ); +vmcs_write (CPU_EXEC_CTRL0 , ctrl_cpu0); +vmcs_write (IO_BITMAP_A , (u64 )io_bitmap_a); +vmcs_write (IO_BITMAP_B , (u64 )io_bitmap_b); +} + +static void iobmp_main () +{ +// stage 0, test IO pass +set_stage (0 ); +inb (0x5000 ); +outb (0x0 ,0x5000 ); +if (stage !=0 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O pass" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O pass" ,1 ); +// test IO width, in/out + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_a)[0 ] =0xFF ; +set_stage (2 ); +inb (0x0 ); +if (stage !=3 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - trap in" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - trap in" ,1 ); +set_stage (3 ); +outw (0x0 ,0x0 ); +if (stage !=4 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - trap out" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - trap out" ,1 ); +set_stage (4 ); +inl (0x0 ); +if (stage !=5 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, long" ,0 ); +// test low/high IO port +set_stage (5 ); + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_a)[0x5000 /8 ] = (1 << (0x5000 %8 )); +inb (0x5000 ); +if (stage ==6 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O port, low part" ,1 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O port, low part" ,0 ); +set_stage (6 ); + ((u8 *)io_bitmap_b)[0x1000 /8 ] = (1 << (0x1000 %8 )); +inb (0x9000 ); +if (stage ==7 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O port, high part" ,1 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O port, high part" ,0 ); +// test partial pass +set_stage (7 ); +inl (0x4FFF ); +if (stage ==8 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - partial pass" ,1 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - partial pass" ,0 ); +// test overrun +set_stage (8 ); +memset (io_bitmap_a,0x0 ,PAGE_SIZE ); +memset (io_bitmap_b,0x0 ,PAGE_SIZE ); +inl (0xFFFF ); +if (stage ==9 ) +report ("I/O bitmap - overrun" ,1 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - overrun" ,0 ); + +return ; +} + +static int iobmp_exit_handler () +{ +u64 guest_rip; +ulong reason, exit_qual; +u32 insn_len; + + guest_rip =vmcs_read (GUEST_RIP ); + reason =vmcs_read (EXI_REASON ) &0xff ; + exit_qual =vmcs_read (EXI_QUALIFICATION ); + insn_len =vmcs_read (EXI_INST_LEN ); +switch (reason) { +case VMX_IO : +switch (stage) { +case 2 : +if ((exit_qual &VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK ) != _VMX_IO_BYTE) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, byte" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, byte" ,1 ); +if (!(exit_qual &VMX_IO_IN )) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O direction, in" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O direction, in" ,1 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 3 : +if ((exit_qual &VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK ) != _VMX_IO_WORD) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, word" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, word" ,1 ); +if (!(exit_qual &VMX_IO_IN )) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O direction, out" ,1 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O direction, out" ,0 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 4 : +if ((exit_qual &VMX_IO_SIZE_MASK ) != _VMX_IO_LONG) +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, long" ,0 ); +else +report ("I/O bitmap - I/O width, long" ,1 ); +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 5 : +if (((exit_qual &VMX_IO_PORT_MASK ) >>VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT ) ==0x5000 ) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 6 : +if (((exit_qual &VMX_IO_PORT_MASK ) >>VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT ) ==0x9000 ) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 7 :
x86/vmx_tests.c static int cr_shadowing_exit_handler() · line 618
Quoted 10 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +10
-0+if (((exit_qual &VMX_IO_PORT_MASK ) >>VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT ) ==0x4FFF ) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 8 : +if (((exit_qual &VMX_IO_PORT_MASK ) >>VMX_IO_PORT_SHIFT ) ==0xFFFF ) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +break ; +case 0 : +case 1 : +set_stage (stage +1 );
Please keep these in order.
x86/vmx_tests.c static int cr_shadowing_exit_handler() · line 621
Quoted 3 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +3
-0+default : +// Should not reach here +break ;
These are not consistent with patch 2 where you have omitted these defaults; if it is not reachable, you should report a failure.
Otherwise, the diff from v1 looks good.
Paolo
Quoted 23 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +13
-0+ } +vmcs_write (GUEST_RIP , guest_rip + insn_len); +return VMX_TEST_RESUME ; +default : +printf ("guest_rip = 0x%llx\n" , guest_rip); +printf ("\tERROR : Undefined exit reason, reason = %d.\n" , reason); +break ; + } +return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT ; +} +/* name/init/guest_main/exit_handler/syscall_handler/guest_regs basic_* just implement some basic functions */ struct vmx_test vmx_tests[] = {@@ -486,5 +643,7 @@ struct vmx_test vmx_tests[] = { test_ctrl_efer_exit_handler, basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, {"CR shadowing" , basic_init, cr_shadowing_main, cr_shadowing_exit_handler, basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, + {"I/O bitmap" , iobmp_init, iobmp_main, iobmp_exit_handler, + basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0} }, };
PATCH v2 4/4 kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interception
In reply to Arthur Chunqi LiAdd test cases for instruction interception, including four types:
1. Primary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (HLT/INVLPG/MWAIT/ RDPMC/RDTSC/MONITOR/PAUSE)
2. Secondary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (WBINVD)
3. No control flag, always trap (CPUID/INVD)
4. Instructions always pass
--- x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 7 +++ x86/vmx_tests.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
x86/vmx.c +1 -2
@@ -336,8 +336,7 @@ static void init_vmx(void) : MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS); ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].val =rdmsr (basic.ctrl ?MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROC :MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS ); -if (ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].set &CPU_SECONDARY ) - ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2 ); + ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2 );if (ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].set &CPU_EPT || ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].set &CPU_VPID ) ept_vpid.val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP );
x86/vmx.h +7 -0
@@ -354,12 +354,17 @@ enum Ctrl0 {CPU_INTR_WINDOW =1ul <<2 ,CPU_HLT =1ul <<7 ,CPU_INVLPG =1ul <<9 , +CPU_MWAIT =1ul <<10 , +CPU_RDPMC =1ul <<11 , +CPU_RDTSC =1ul <<12 ,CPU_CR3_LOAD =1ul <<15 ,CPU_CR3_STORE =1ul <<16 ,CPU_TPR_SHADOW =1ul <<21 ,CPU_NMI_WINDOW =1ul <<22 ,CPU_IO =1ul <<24 ,CPU_IO_BITMAP =1ul <<25 , +CPU_MONITOR =1ul <<29 , +CPU_PAUSE =1ul <<30 ,CPU_MSR_BITMAP =1ul <<28 , CPU_SECONDARY = 1ul << 31, };
@@ -368,6 +373,8 @@ enum Ctrl1 {CPU_EPT =1ul <<1 ,CPU_VPID =1ul <<5 ,CPU_URG =1ul <<7 , +CPU_WBINVD =1ul <<6 , + CPU_RDRAND = 1ul << 11, };#define SAVE_GPR \
x86/vmx_tests.c +152 -0
169 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 4/4] kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interception
Il 15/08/2013 13:45, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
Quoted 37 lines
Add test cases for instruction interception, including four types:
1. Primary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (HLT/INVLPG/MWAIT/ RDPMC/RDTSC/MONITOR/PAUSE)
2. Secondary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls (WBINVD)
3. No control flag, always trap (CPUID/INVD)
4. Instructions always passSigned-off-by Arthur Chunqi Li <[email protected]>--- x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 7 +++ x86/vmx_tests.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)x86/vmx.c +1
-2@@ -336,8 +336,7 @@ static void init_vmx(void) : MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS); ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].val =rdmsr (basic.ctrl ?MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROC :MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS ); -if (ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].set &CPU_SECONDARY ) - ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2 ); + ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2 );if (ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].set &CPU_EPT || ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].set &CPU_VPID ) ept_vpid.val =rdmsr (MSR_IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP );x86/vmx.h +1
-0@@ -354,12 +354,17 @@ enum Ctrl0 {CPU_INTR_WINDOW =1ul <<2 ,CPU_HLT =1ul <<7 ,CPU_INVLPG =1ul <<9 , + CPU_MWAIT = 1ul << 10,
x86/vmx.h enum Ctrl0 { · line 367
Quoted 10 lines
x86/vmx.h +4
-0+CPU_RDPMC =1ul <<11 , +CPU_RDTSC =1ul <<12 ,CPU_CR3_LOAD =1ul <<15 ,CPU_CR3_STORE =1ul <<16 ,CPU_TPR_SHADOW =1ul <<21 ,CPU_NMI_WINDOW =1ul <<22 ,CPU_IO =1ul <<24 ,CPU_IO_BITMAP =1ul <<25 , +CPU_MONITOR =1ul <<29 , + CPU_PAUSE = 1ul << 30,
Please keep these sorted.
Quoted 138 lines
x86/vmx.h +2
-0CPU_MSR_BITMAP =1ul <<28 , CPU_SECONDARY = 1ul << 31, };@@ -368,6 +373,8 @@ enum Ctrl1 {CPU_EPT =1ul <<1 ,CPU_VPID =1ul <<5 ,CPU_URG =1ul <<7 , +CPU_WBINVD =1ul <<6 , + CPU_RDRAND = 1ul << 11, };#define SAVE_GPR \x86/vmx_tests.c +111
-0@@ -22,6 +22,16 @@ static inline void set_stage(u32 s)barrier (); } +static inline u32 get_stage () +{ +u32 s; + +barrier (); + s = stage; +barrier (); +return s; +} +void basic_init () { }@@ -630,6 +640,146 @@ static int iobmp_exit_handler()return VMX_TEST_VMEXIT ; } +#define INSN_CPU0 0 +#define INSN_CPU1 1 +#define INSN_ALWAYS_TRAP 2 +#define INSN_NEVER_TRAP 3 + +#define FIELD_EXIT_QUAL 0 +#define FIELD_INSN_INFO 1 + +asm( +"insn_hlt: hlt;ret\n\t" +"insn_invlpg: invlpg 0x12345678;ret\n\t" +"insn_mwait: mwait;ret\n\t" +"insn_rdpmc: rdpmc;ret\n\t" +"insn_rdtsc: rdtsc;ret\n\t" +"insn_monitor: monitor;ret\n\t" +"insn_pause: pause;ret\n\t" +"insn_wbinvd: wbinvd;ret\n\t" +"insn_cpuid: cpuid;ret\n\t" +"insn_invd: invd;ret\n\t" +); +extern void insn_hlt (); +extern void insn_invlpg (); +extern void insn_mwait (); +extern void insn_rdpmc (); +extern void insn_rdtsc (); +extern void insn_monitor (); +extern void insn_pause (); +extern void insn_wbinvd (); +extern void insn_cpuid (); +extern void insn_invd (); + +u32 cur_insn; + +struct insn_table { +const char *name; +u32 flag; +void (*insn_func)(); +u32 type; +u32 reason; +ulong exit_qual; +u32 insn_info; +// Use FIELD_EXIT_QUAL and FIELD_INSN_INFO to efines +// which field need to be tested, reason is always tested +u32 test_field; +}; + +static struct insn_table insn_table[] = { +// Flags for Primary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls + {"HLT" ,CPU_HLT , insn_hlt,INSN_CPU0 ,12 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"INVLPG" ,CPU_INVLPG , insn_invlpg,INSN_CPU0 ,14 , +0x12345678 ,0 ,FIELD_EXIT_QUAL }, + {"MWAIT" ,CPU_MWAIT , insn_mwait,INSN_CPU0 ,36 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"RDPMC" ,CPU_RDPMC , insn_rdpmc,INSN_CPU0 ,15 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"RDTSC" ,CPU_RDTSC , insn_rdtsc,INSN_CPU0 ,16 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"MONITOR" ,CPU_MONITOR , insn_monitor,INSN_CPU0 ,39 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"PAUSE" ,CPU_PAUSE , insn_pause,INSN_CPU0 ,40 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, +// Flags for Secondary Processor-Based VM-Execution Controls + {"WBINVD" ,CPU_WBINVD , insn_wbinvd,INSN_CPU1 ,54 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, +// Instructions always trap + {"CPUID" ,0 , insn_cpuid,INSN_ALWAYS_TRAP ,10 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, + {"INVD" ,0 , insn_invd,INSN_ALWAYS_TRAP ,13 ,0 ,0 ,0 }, +// Instructions never trap + {NULL }, +}; + +static void insn_intercept_init () +{ +u32 ctrl_cpu[2 ]; + + ctrl_cpu[0 ] =vmcs_read (CPU_EXEC_CTRL0 ); + ctrl_cpu[0 ] |=CPU_HLT |CPU_INVLPG |CPU_MWAIT |CPU_RDPMC |CPU_RDTSC | +CPU_MONITOR |CPU_PAUSE |CPU_SECONDARY ; + ctrl_cpu[0 ] &= ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].clr; +vmcs_write (CPU_EXEC_CTRL0 , ctrl_cpu[0 ]); + ctrl_cpu[1 ] =vmcs_read (CPU_EXEC_CTRL1 ); + ctrl_cpu[1 ] |=CPU_WBINVD |CPU_RDRAND ; + ctrl_cpu[1 ] &= ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].clr; +vmcs_write (CPU_EXEC_CTRL1 , ctrl_cpu[1 ]); +} + +static void insn_intercept_main () +{ + cur_insn =0 ; +while (insn_table[cur_insn].name !=NULL ) { +set_stage (cur_insn); +if ((insn_table[cur_insn].type ==INSN_CPU0 + && !(ctrl_cpu_rev[0 ].clr & insn_table[cur_insn].flag)) + || (insn_table[cur_insn].type ==INSN_CPU1 + && !(ctrl_cpu_rev[1 ].clr & insn_table[cur_insn].flag))) { +printf ("\tCPU_CTRL1.CPU_%s is not supported.\n" , + insn_table[cur_insn].name); +continue ; + } + insn_table[cur_insn].insn_func (); +switch (insn_table[cur_insn].type) { +case INSN_CPU0 : +case INSN_CPU1 : +case INSN_ALWAYS_TRAP : +if (stage != cur_insn +1 ) +report (insn_table[cur_insn].name,0 ); +else
x86/vmx_tests.c static int iobmp_exit_handler() · line 753
Quoted 10 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +10
-0+report (insn_table[cur_insn].name,1 ); +break ; +case INSN_NEVER_TRAP : +if (stage == cur_insn +1 ) +report (insn_table[cur_insn].name,0 ); +else +report (insn_table[cur_insn].name,1 ); +break ; + } + cur_insn ++;
No space before ++.
Otherwise looks good.
Paolo
Quoted 41 lines
x86/vmx_tests.c +31
-0+ } +} + +static int insn_intercept_exit_handler () +{ +u64 guest_rip; +u32 reason; +ulong exit_qual; +u32 insn_len; +u32 insn_info; +bool pass; + + guest_rip =vmcs_read (GUEST_RIP ); + reason =vmcs_read (EXI_REASON ) &0xff ; + exit_qual =vmcs_read (EXI_QUALIFICATION ); + insn_len =vmcs_read (EXI_INST_LEN ); + insn_info =vmcs_read (EXI_INST_INFO ); + pass = (cur_insn ==get_stage ()) && + insn_table[cur_insn].reason == reason; +if (insn_table[cur_insn].test_field &FIELD_EXIT_QUAL ) + pass = pass && insn_table[cur_insn].exit_qual == exit_qual; +if (insn_table[cur_insn].test_field &FIELD_INSN_INFO ) + pass = pass && insn_table[cur_insn].insn_info == insn_info; +if (pass) +set_stage (stage +1 ); +vmcs_write (GUEST_RIP , guest_rip + insn_len); +return VMX_TEST_RESUME ; +} +/* name/init/guest_main/exit_handler/syscall_handler/guest_regs basic_* just implement some basic functions */ struct vmx_test vmx_tests[] = {@@ -645,5 +795,7 @@ struct vmx_test vmx_tests[] = { cr_shadowing_exit_handler, basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, {"I/O bitmap" , iobmp_init, iobmp_main, iobmp_exit_handler, basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, + {"instruction intercept" , insn_intercept_init, insn_intercept_main, + insn_intercept_exit_handler, basic_syscall_handler, {0} }, { NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0} }, };
Hi Gleb, Paolo and Jan,
Would you please review this series of codes when you can spare time? Jan has review it and, of course, further suggestions are welcomed.
Arthur
Quoted 17 lines · Arthur Chunqi Li
Add a series of test cases for nested VMX in kvm-unit-tests.
Arthur Chunqi Li (4):
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interceptionlib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 20 +- x86/vmx_tests.c | 714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 736 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)--
1.7.9.5
Quoted 2 lines · Arthur Chunqi Li
Hi Gleb, Paolo and Jan,
Jan, have you reviewed it? Any ACKs?
Quoted 23 lines
Would you please review this series of codes when you can spare time? Jan has review it and, of course, further suggestions are welcomed.
Arthur
Quoted 17 lines · Arthur Chunqi Li
Add a series of test cases for nested VMX in kvm-unit-tests.
Arthur Chunqi Li (4):
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interceptionlib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 20 +- x86/vmx_tests.c | 714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 736 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)--
1.7.9.5
--
Gleb.
Quoted 4 lines · Gleb Natapov
Quoted 2 lines · Arthur Chunqi Li
Hi Gleb, Paolo and Jan,
Jan, have you reviewed it? Any ACKs?
I've only reviewed v1, but I scheduled v2 for tonight now.
Jan
Quoted 28 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Would you please review this series of codes when you can spare time? Jan has review it and, of course, further suggestions are welcomed.
Arthur
Quoted 17 lines · Arthur Chunqi Li
Add a series of test cases for nested VMX in kvm-unit-tests.
Arthur Chunqi Li (4):
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for PAT and EFER
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for CR0/4 shadowing
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for I/O bitmaps
kvm-unit-tests: VMX: Add test cases for instruction interceptionlib/x86/vm.h | 4 + x86/vmx.c | 3 +- x86/vmx.h | 20 +- x86/vmx_tests.c | 714 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 736 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)--
1.7.9.5--
Gleb.