procfs: make smp_affinity values 0644
PATCH 1/1 procfs: make smp_affinity values 0644
Includes:
- /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity
- /proc/irq/*/smp_affinity
- /proc/irq/*/smp_affinity_list
Users can distill the same information by reading /proc/interrupts.
Signed-off-by Chema Gonzalez <[email protected]>
--- kernel/irq/proc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
kernel/irq/proc.c +3 -3
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)#ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* create /proc/irq/<irq>/smp_affinity */ -proc_create_data ("smp_affinity" ,0600 , desc->dir, +proc_create_data ("smp_affinity" ,0644 , desc->dir, &irq_affinity_proc_fops, (void *)(long )irq);/* create /proc/irq/<irq>/affinity_hint */
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) &irq_affinity_hint_proc_fops, (void *)(long)irq);/* create /proc/irq/<irq>/smp_affinity_list */ -proc_create_data ("smp_affinity_list" ,0600 , desc->dir, +proc_create_data ("smp_affinity_list" ,0644 , desc->dir, &irq_affinity_list_proc_fops, (void *)(long )irq); proc_create_data("node", 0444, desc->dir,
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ void unregister_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action)static void register_default_affinity_proc (void ) {#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -proc_create ("irq/default_smp_affinity" ,0600 ,NULL , +proc_create ("irq/default_smp_affinity" ,0644 ,NULL , &default_affinity_proc_fops);#endif }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0.279.gdc9e3eb
Quoted 9 lines · Chema Gonzalez
Includes:
-/proc/irq/default_smp_affinity
-/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity
-/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity_listUsers can distill the same information by reading
/proc/interrupts.Signed-off-by Chema Gonzalez <[email protected]>---
Seems good to me, but what about affinity_hint ?
0444 maybe?
-Chema
Quoted 14 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 9 lines · Chema Gonzalez
Includes:
-/proc/irq/default_smp_affinity
-/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity
-/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity_listUsers can distill the same information by reading
/proc/interrupts.Signed-off-by Chema Gonzalez <[email protected]>---
Seems good to me, but what about
affinity_hint?