clang sandbox warning
Hello Simon,
While trying to find a u-boot make command which likely works with a pre-build clang linux package I got the following warnings:
make CC="clang -no-integrated-as" HOSTCC="clang -no-integrated-as" HOST_TOOLS_ALL=y sandbox_config tools
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:59:17:
warning: variable 'flags' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
local_irq_save(flags);
^~~~~
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:56:21:
note: initialize the variable 'flags' to silence this warning
unsigned long flags;
^
= 0
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:81:17:
warning: variable 'flags' is uninitialized when used here
[-Wuninitialized]
local_irq_save(flags);
^~~~~
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:78:21:
note: initialize the variable 'flags' to silence this warning
unsigned long flags;
^
= 0I guess gcc accepts this since flags is not actually used. Anyway merely mentioned for completeness. You might be interested in:
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:77:6: warning:
variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (!rsa) {
^~~~
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:94:9: note:
uninitialized use occurs here
return ret;
^~~
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:77:2: note:
remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
if (!rsa) {
^~~~~~~~~~~
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:48:9: note:
initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning
int ret;
^
= 0which actually looks like a bug. And:
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:59:27:
warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtautological-compare]
for (i = key->len - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
~ ^ ~which looks a bit odd, especially since there is no way to break out of the loop and reach the final return statement, which has a comment to that it might be useful (equal).
Regards,
Jeroen
Hi Jeroen,
Quoted 58 lines · Jeroen Hofstee
Hello Simon,
While trying to find a u-boot make command which likely works with a pre-build clang linux package I got the following warnings:
make CC="clang -no-integrated-as" HOSTCC="clang -no-integrated-as" HOST_TOOLS_ALL=y sandbox_config tools
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:59:17:
warning: variable 'flags' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]local_irq_save(flags); ^~~~~ /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:56:21: note: initialize the variable 'flags' to silence this warning unsigned long flags; ^ = 0 /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:81:17: warning: variable 'flags' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] local_irq_save(flags); ^~~~~ /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h:78:21: note: initialize the variable 'flags' to silence this warning unsigned long flags; ^ = 0I guess gcc accepts this since flags is not actually used. Anyway merely mentioned for completeness. You might be interested in:
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:77:6: warning:
variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]if (!rsa) { ^~~~ /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:94:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here return ret; ^~~ /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:77:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false if (!rsa) { ^~~~~~~~~~~ /home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-sign.c:48:9: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning int ret; ^ = 0which actually looks like a bug. And:
/home/jeroen/software/u-boot/tools/../lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:59:27:
warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtautological-compare]
Quoted 7 lines
for (i = key->len - 1; i >= 0; i--) { ~ ^ ~which looks a bit odd, especially since there is no way to break out of the loop and reach the final return statement, which has a comment to that it might be useful (equal).
Both of these looks like bugs - I will copy you on a patch (I don't see a fix from you in patchwork). Thanks for reporting this.
Regards,
Simon