fs: btrfs: Add missing include file

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

---

 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

fs/btrfs/inode.c +1 -0

index 37dc84c..5b6e5bd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/btrfs.h>
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
+#include <linux/uio.h>
 #include "ctree.h"
 #include "disk-io.h"
 #include "transaction.h"

Signature · 1 line

2.1.0

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

---

Quoted 6 lines · Guenter Roeck

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'iov_iter_alignment'

Quoted 6 lines

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

---

This problem still affects the following builds as of today.

alpha:allmodconfig
i386:allyesconfig
i386:allmodconfig
m68k:allmodconfig
mips:allmodconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig

and thus probabably many other allmodconfig builds which I don't try to build.

This is getting really annoying, and prevents us from finding and fixing other build problems.

It has been more than two weeks since I submitted the patch. This suggests that the patch got lost otr that the Powers That Be don't care. Which one is it ?

Should I request to revert 3737c63e1fb0 instead ?

Quoted 27 lines · Guenter Roeck

Quoted 11 lines · Guenter Roeck

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_Excellent idea. Done,IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment'

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

---

This problem still affects the following builds as of today.

alpha:allmodconfig
i386:allyesconfig
i386:allmodconfig
m68k:allmodconfig
mips:allmodconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig

and thus probabably many other allmodconfig builds which I don't try to build.

This is getting really annoying, and prevents us from finding and fixing other build problems.

Quoted 5 lines

It has been more than two weeks since I submitted the patch. This suggests that the patch got lost otr that the Powers That Be don't care. Which one is it ?

Should I request to revert 3737c63e1fb0 instead ?

I'll put the include into my branch for -next, thanks!

Quoted 36 lines · Chris Mason

Quoted 34 lines · Guenter Roeck

Quoted 7 lines · Guenter Roeck

Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with

fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_Excellent idea.
Done,IO':
fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'iov_iter_alignment'

Quoted 6 lines

due to a missing include file.

Fixes 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h")

Cc Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

---

This problem still affects the following builds as of today.

alpha:allmodconfig
i386:allyesconfig
i386:allmodconfig
m68k:allmodconfig
mips:allmodconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig

and thus probabably many other allmodconfig builds which I don't try to build.

This is getting really annoying, and prevents us from finding and fixing other build problems.

It has been more than two weeks since I submitted the patch. This suggests that the patch got lost otr that the Powers That Be don't care. Which one is it ?

Should I request to revert 3737c63e1fb0 instead ?

Quoted 2 lines

I'll put the include into my branch for -next, thanks!

I have not seen the problem in the latest -next build, which presumably means that some other patch must have fixed the problem or at least hides it now. No idea which one, though.