Skip to contentSkip to conversation

i2c: s3c2410: Don't enable PM runtime on the adapter device

PATCH In review Charles Keepax 4 participants 4 messages Apr 16, 2015 2 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 i2c: s3c2410: Don't enable PM runtime on the adapter device

Commit 523c5b89640e ("i2c: Remove support for legacy PM") removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to a driver and as such can't have its own pm_runtime callbacks. Previously this was fine as the bus callbacks would have been used, but now this can cause devices which use PM runtime and are attached over I2C to fail to resume.

This commit fixes this issue by just doing the PM operations directly on the I2C device, rather than the adapter device in the driver and adding some stub callbacks for runtime suspend and resume.

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +16 -5
index 958c8db..4e6a724 100644
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 	int retry;
 	int ret;
 
-	pm_runtime_get_sync(&adap->dev);
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(i2c->dev);
 	ret = clk_enable(i2c->clk);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 
 		if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
 			clk_disable(i2c->clk);
-			pm_runtime_put(&adap->dev);
+			pm_runtime_put(i2c->dev);
 			return ret;
 		}
 
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 	}
 
 	clk_disable(i2c->clk);
-	pm_runtime_put(&adap->dev);
+	pm_runtime_put(i2c->dev);
 	return -EREMOTEIO;
 }
 
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
 
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	pm_runtime_enable(&i2c->adap.dev);
 
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s: S3C I2C adapter\n", dev_name(&i2c->adap.dev));
 	return 0;
@@ -1270,7 +1269,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	clk_unprepare(i2c->clk);
 
-	pm_runtime_disable(&i2c->adap.dev);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
 
 	s3c24xx_i2c_deregister_cpufreq(i2c);
@@ -1318,6 +1316,16 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int s3c24xx_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int s3c24xx_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct dev_pm_ops s3c24xx_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 	.suspend_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq,
@@ -1327,6 +1335,9 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops s3c24xx_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
 	.poweroff_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_suspend_noirq,
 	.restore_noirq = s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq,
 #endif
+	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(s3c24xx_runtime_suspend,
+			   s3c24xx_runtime_resume,
+			   NULL)
 };
 
 #define S3C24XX_DEV_PM_OPS (&s3c24xx_i2c_dev_pm_ops)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.2.5
#1 lore raw
Quoted 18 lines · Charles Keepax

Commit 523c5b89640e ("i2c: Remove support for legacy PM") removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to a driver and as such can't have its own pm_runtime callbacks. Previously this was fine as the bus callbacks would have been used, but now this can cause devices which use PM runtime and are attached over I2C to fail to resume.

This commit fixes this issue by just doing the PM operations directly on the I2C device, rather than the adapter device in the driver and adding some stub callbacks for runtime suspend and resume.

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1254

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +0 -0
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
 

Wouldn't adding

	pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&pdev->dev);

here let us avoid the runtime resume/suspend stubs?

Quoted 16 lines
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +0 -2
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
-	pm_runtime_enable(&i2c->adap.dev);
 
 	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s: S3C I2C adapter\n", dev_name(&i2c->adap.dev));
 	return 0;
@@ -1270,7 +1269,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	clk_unprepare(i2c->clk);
 
-	pm_runtime_disable(&i2c->adap.dev);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
 
 	s3c24xx_i2c_deregister_cpufreq(i2c);
@@ -1318,6 +1316,16 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
 #endif
 

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c static int s3c24xx_i2c_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) · line 1327

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +9 -0
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int s3c24xx_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int s3c24xx_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}

--
Thanks,
Sylwester

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#3 lore raw
Quoted 24 lines · Sylwester Nawrocki
Quoted 18 lines · Charles Keepax

Commit 523c5b89640e ("i2c: Remove support for legacy PM") removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to a driver and as such can't have its own pm_runtime callbacks. Previously this was fine as the bus callbacks would have been used, but now this can cause devices which use PM runtime and are attached over I2C to fail to resume.

This commit fixes this issue by just doing the PM operations directly on the I2C device, rather than the adapter device in the driver and adding some stub callbacks for runtime suspend and resume.

---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1254

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +0 -0
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
 

Wouldn't adding

Quoted 3 lines
	pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&pdev->dev);

here let us avoid the runtime resume/suspend stubs?

Or just do pm_runtime_no_callbacks on the adapter device. Preferably in the I2C core. That should solve the issue without requiring any other changes.

- Lars

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 552F916F.6070700-Qo5EllUWu/[email protected]

#5 lore raw
Quoted 27 lines · Lars-Peter Clausen
Quoted 26 lines · Sylwester Nawrocki
Quoted 18 lines · Charles Keepax

Commit 523c5b89640e ("i2c: Remove support for legacy PM") removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to a driver and as such can't have its own pm_runtime callbacks. Previously this was fine as the bus callbacks would have been used, but now this can cause devices which use PM runtime and are attached over I2C to fail to resume.

This commit fixes this issue by just doing the PM operations directly on the I2C device, rather than the adapter device in the driver and adding some stub callbacks for runtime suspend and resume.

---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1254

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +0 -0
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
 

Wouldn't adding

	pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&pdev->dev);
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

here let us avoid the runtime resume/suspend stubs?

Or just do pm_runtime_no_callbacks on the adapter device. Preferably in the I2C core. That should solve the issue without requiring any other changes.

- Lars

Ooops... missed that function, yeah that looks like a much better option.

Thanks,
Charles