Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Move mmc_of_parse() to the dt probe

PATCH Superseded Fabio Estevam 2 participants 5 messages May 8, 2015 – May 9, 2015

Subsystems (4)

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Fabio Estevam

author reviewer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Move mmc_of_parse() to the dt probe

From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>

mmc_of_parse() should be placed inside sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt() as it suits only for the dt case.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +2 -6
index d7b0a39..a9980d7 100644
@@ -896,7 +896,8 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	mmc_of_parse_voltage(np, &host->ocr_mask);
 
-	return 0;
+	/* call to generic mmc_of_parse to support additional capabilities */
+	return mmc_of_parse(host->mmc);
 }
 #else
 static inline int
@@ -1041,11 +1042,6 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V;
 	}
 
-	/* call to generic mmc_of_parse to support additional capabilities */
-	err = mmc_of_parse(host->mmc);
-	if (err)
-		goto disable_clk;
-
 	err = sdhci_add_host(host);
 	if (err)
 		goto disable_clk;
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
author reviewer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Do not break platform data boards

From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>

The only user of this driver that has not been converted to fully device tree is the i.MX35 SoC.

There is a i.MX35-based board (mach-pcm043.c) that uses platform data to pass wp_gpio and cd_gpio information.

Commit 8d86e4fcccf61ba ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Call mmc_of_parse()") broke the platform data case by removing mmc_gpio_request_ro() and mmc_gpio_request_cd(), so restore the functionality for the non-dt case.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +35 -1
index a9980d7..812c670 100644
@@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct esdhc_platform_data *boarddata;
 	int err;
 	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data;
+	bool dt = true;
 
 	host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(host))
@@ -1005,11 +1006,44 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 		imx_data->boarddata = *((struct esdhc_platform_data *)
 					host->mmc->parent->platform_data);
+		dt = false;
+	}
+	/* write_protect */
+	if (boarddata->wp_type == ESDHC_WP_GPIO && !dt) {
+		err = mmc_gpio_request_ro(host->mmc, boarddata->wp_gpio);
+		if (err) {
+			dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
+				"failed to request write-protect gpio!\n");
+			goto disable_clk;
+		}
+		host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
 	}
 
 	/* card_detect */
-	if (boarddata->cd_type == ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER)
+	switch (boarddata->cd_type) {
+	case ESDHC_CD_GPIO:
+		if (dt)
+			break;
+		err = mmc_gpio_request_cd(host->mmc, boarddata->cd_gpio, 0);
+		if (err) {
+			dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
+				"failed to request card-detect gpio!\n");
+			goto disable_clk;
+		}
+		/* fall through */
+
+	case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
+		/* we have a working card_detect back */
 		host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
+		break;
+
+	case ESDHC_CD_PERMANENT:
+		host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
+		break;
+
+	case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
+		break;
+	}
 
 	switch (boarddata->max_bus_width) {
 	case 8:
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Do not break platform data boards

Quoted 40 lines · Fabio Estevam

From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>

The only user of this driver that has not been converted to fully device tree is the i.MX35 SoC.

There is a i.MX35-based board (mach-pcm043.c) that uses platform data to pass wp_gpio and cd_gpio information.

Commit 8d86e4fcccf61ba ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Call mmc_of_parse()") broke the platform data case by removing mmc_gpio_request_ro() and mmc_gpio_request_cd(), so restore the functionality for the non-dt case.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +7 -0
index a9980d7..812c670 100644
@@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct esdhc_platform_data *boarddata;
        int err;
        struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data;
+       bool dt = true;
 
        host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata, 0);
        if (IS_ERR(host))
@@ -1005,11 +1006,44 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                }
                imx_data->boarddata = *((struct esdhc_platform_data *)
                                        host->mmc->parent->platform_data);
+               dt = false;
+       }
+       /* write_protect */
+       if (boarddata->wp_type == ESDHC_WP_GPIO && !dt) {
+               err = mmc_gpio_request_ro(host->mmc, boarddata->wp_gpio);
+               if (err) {

drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1023

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +6 -1
+                       dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
+                               "failed to request write-protect gpio!\n");
+                       goto disable_clk;
+               }
+               host->mmc->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_RO_ACTIVE_HIGH;
        }
 
        /* card_detect */
-       if (boarddata->cd_type == ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER)
+       switch (boarddata->cd_type) {

I don't think you want to do this "switch" for dt case, right?

Quoted 27 lines
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +22 -1
+       case ESDHC_CD_GPIO:
+               if (dt)
+                       break;
+               err = mmc_gpio_request_cd(host->mmc, boarddata->cd_gpio, 0);
+               if (err) {
+                       dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
+                               "failed to request card-detect gpio!\n");
+                       goto disable_clk;
+               }
+               /* fall through */
+
+       case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
+               /* we have a working card_detect back */
                host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
+               break;
+
+       case ESDHC_CD_PERMANENT:
+               host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
+               break;
+
+       case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
+               break;
+       }
 
        switch (boarddata->max_bus_width) {
        case 8:
--
Quoted 2 lines

1.9.1

Kind regards
Uffe

author reviewer
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Do not break platform data boards

Hi Ulf,

Quoted 5 lines · Ulf Hansson

drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 1023

Quoted 3 lines
        /* card_detect */
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +1 -1
-       if (boarddata->cd_type == ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER)
+       switch (boarddata->cd_type) {

I don't think you want to do this "switch" for dt case, right?

dt case needs the switch in order not to break the users of the "fsl,cd-controller" property.

Actually, I don't see any dts file really using it, but since it is documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt, then we need to keep supporting it.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Do not break platform data boards

Quoted 8 lines · Fabio Estevam

Hi Ulf,

Quoted 4 lines · Ulf Hansson
Quoted 3 lines
        /* card_detect */
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +1 -1
-       if (boarddata->cd_type == ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER)
+       switch (boarddata->cd_type) {
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

I don't think you want to do this "switch" for dt case, right?

dt case needs the switch in order not to break the users of the "fsl,cd-controller" property.

Actually, I don't see any dts file really using it, but since it is documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt, then we need to keep supporting it.

Okay. Perhaps the commit message could inform us about that as well?

Kind regards
Uffe