Skip to contentSkip to conversation

regulator: da9063: Fix up irq leak

PATCH Applied Axel Lin 2 participants 2 messages May 31, 2015 – Jun 2, 2015

Subsystems (2)
Voltage and current regulator framework Dialog semiconductor drivers
lore
Share & tools
lore

Axel Lin

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 regulator: da9063: Fix up irq leak

Current code does not set regulators->irq_ldo_lim and regulators->irq_uvov, so it actually calls free_irq(0, regulators) twice in remove() but does not free the irq actually used.

Convert to use devm_request_threaded_irq instead and then we don't need to take care the clean up irq so remove irq_ldo_lim and irq_uvov from struct da9063_regulators. Note, regulators->irq_uvov is not used at all in current code.

There is a slightly change in this patch, it will return error in probe() if devm_request_threaded_irq fails. If the irq is optional, it should be fine to allow platform_get_irq_byname fails. But current code does not allow platform_get_irq_byname fails. So I think the reason to allow request irq failure is just because the irq leak.

Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c | 21 +++------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c +3 -18
index 31c2c59..aed1ad3 100644
@@ -117,9 +117,6 @@ struct da9063_regulator {
 
 /* Encapsulates all information for the regulators driver */
 struct da9063_regulators {
-	int					irq_ldo_lim;
-	int					irq_uvov;
-
 	unsigned				n_regulators;
 	/* Array size to be defined during init. Keep at end. */
 	struct da9063_regulator			regulator[0];

@@ -867,35 +864,23 @@ static int da9063_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return irq;
 	}
 
-	ret = request_threaded_irq(irq,
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
 				NULL, da9063_ldo_lim_event,
 				IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
 				"LDO_LIM", regulators);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-				"Failed to request LDO_LIM IRQ.\n");
-		regulators->irq_ldo_lim = -ENXIO;
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request LDO_LIM IRQ.\n");
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int da9063_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	struct da9063_regulators *regulators = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-
-	free_irq(regulators->irq_ldo_lim, regulators);
-	free_irq(regulators->irq_uvov, regulators);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static struct platform_driver da9063_regulator_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = DA9063_DRVNAME_REGULATORS,
 	},
 	.probe = da9063_regulator_probe,
-	.remove = da9063_regulator_remove,
 };
 
 static int __init da9063_regulator_init(void)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.0
maintainer Applied
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Axel Lin

Current code does not set regulators->irq_ldo_lim and regulators->irq_uvov, so it actually calls free_irq(0, regulators) twice in remove() but does not free the irq actually used.

Applied, thanks.