FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
b0dc2b9bb4ab782115b964310518ee0b17784277Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:17:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single
node machines
NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of num_online_nodes (online nodes).
The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due to minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine whose node ID happened to be 1:
vanilla patched
NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0 NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0 NUMA page range updates 5442374 0 NUMA hint faults 2109622 0 NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local percent 100 100
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
mm/mempolicy.c +1 -1
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)if (numabalancing_override)set_numabalancing_state (numabalancing_override ==1 ); -if (nr_node_ids >1 && !numabalancing_override) { +if (num_online_nodes () >1 && !numabalancing_override) { pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. " "Configure with numa_balancing= or the " "kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",