FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in" failed to apply to 4.1-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
1c8a38b1268aebc1a903b21b11575077e02d2cf7Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in
at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg()
This patch adds the missing update of the transfer data width in at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg().
Indeed, for each item in the scatter-gather list, we check whether the transfer length is aligned with the data width provided by dmaengine_slave_config(). If so, we directly use this data width for the current part of the transfer we are preparing. Otherwise, the data width is reduced to 8 bits (1 byte). Of course, the actual number of register accesses must also be updated to match the new data width.
So one chunk was missing in the original patch (see Fixes tag below): the number of register accesses was correctly set to (len >> fixed_dwidth) in mbr_ubc but the real data width was not updated in mbr_cfg. Since mbr_cfg may change for each part of the scatter-gather transfer this also explains why the original patch used the Descriptor View 2 instead of the Descriptor View 1.
Let's take the example of a DMA transfer to write 8bit data into an Atmel USART with FIFOs. When FIFOs are enabled in the USART, its Transmit Holding Register (THR) works in multidata mode, that is to say that up to 4 8bit data can be written into the THR in a single 32bit access and it is still possible to write only one data with a 8bit access. To take advantage of this new feature, the DMA driver was modified to allow multiple dwidths when doing slave transfers.
For instance, when the total length is 22 bytes, the USART driver splits the transfer into 2 parts:
First part: 20 bytes transferred through 5 32bit writes into THR Second part: 2 bytes transferred though 2 8bit writes into THR
For the second part, the data width was first set to 4_BYTES by the USART driver thanks to dmaengine_slave_config() then at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg() reduces this data width to 1_BYTE because the 2 byte length is not aligned with the original 4_BYTES data width. Since the data width is modified, the actual number of writes into THR must be set accordingly.
drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c +4 -3
@@ -682,15 +682,16 @@ at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl, desc->lld.mbr_sa = mem; desc->lld.mbr_da = atchan->sconfig.dst_addr; } - desc->lld.mbr_cfg = atchan->cfg; - dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg); + dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (atchan->cfg); fixed_dwidth =IS_ALIGNED (len,1 << dwidth) - ?at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg) + ? dwidth :AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_BYTE ; desc->lld.mbr_ubc =AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDV2 /* next descriptor view */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDEN /* next descriptor dst parameter update */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NSEN /* next descriptor src parameter update */ | (len >> fixed_dwidth);/* microblock length */ + desc->lld.mbr_cfg = (atchan->cfg & ~AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_MASK ) | +AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH (fixed_dwidth);dev_dbg (chan2dev (chan),"%s: lld: mbr_sa=%pad, mbr_da=%pad, mbr_ubc=0x%08x\n" , __func__, &desc->lld.mbr_sa, &desc->lld.mbr_da, desc->lld.mbr_ubc);
Hi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:27:56PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
I have tried to cherry-pick it on 4.1.4 and even on the fresh 4.1.5 and I have no conflict.
Can you tell me on top of which commit I have to pick this patch in order to get the conflict and fix it.
Quoted 8 lines
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
Thanks
Ludovic
Quoted 76 lines
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
1c8a38b1268aebc1a903b21b11575077e02d2cf7Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine:at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in
at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg()This patch adds the missing update of the transfer data width in
at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg().Indeed, for each item in the scatter-gather list, we check whether the transfer length is aligned with the data width provided by
dmaengine_slave_config(). If so, we directly use this data width for the current part of the transfer we are preparing. Otherwise, the data width is reduced to 8 bits (1 byte). Of course, the actual number of register accesses must also be updated to match the new data width.So one chunk was missing in the original patch (see Fixes tag below): the number of register accesses was correctly set to (len >>
fixed_dwidth) inmbr_ubcbut the real data width was not updated inmbr_cfg. Sincembr_cfgmay change for each part of the scatter-gather transfer this also explains why the original patch used the Descriptor View 2 instead of the Descriptor View 1.Let's take the example of a DMA transfer to write 8bit data into an Atmel USART with FIFOs. When FIFOs are enabled in the USART, its Transmit Holding Register (THR) works in multidata mode, that is to say that up to 4 8bit data can be written into the THR in a single 32bit access and it is still possible to write only one data with a 8bit access. To take advantage of this new feature, the DMA driver was modified to allow multiple dwidths when doing slave transfers.
For instance, when the total length is 22 bytes, the USART driver splits the transfer into 2 parts:First part: 20 bytes transferred through 5 32bit writes into THR Second part: 2 bytes transferred though 2 8bit writes into THR
For the second part, the data width was first set to 4_BYTES by the USART driver thanks to
dmaengine_slave_config()thenat_xdmac_prep_slave_sg()reduces this data width to 1_BYTE because the 2 byte length is not aligned with the original 4_BYTES data width. Since the data width is modified, the actual number of writes into THR must be set accordingly.Signed-off-by Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]>Fixes 6d3a7d9e3ada ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: allow muliple dwidths when doing slave transfers")Cc [email protected] #4.0 and laterAcked-by Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Vinod Koul <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c +4
-3@@ -682,15 +682,16 @@ at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl, desc->lld.mbr_sa = mem; desc->lld.mbr_da = atchan->sconfig.dst_addr; } - desc->lld.mbr_cfg = atchan->cfg; - dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg); + dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (atchan->cfg); fixed_dwidth =IS_ALIGNED (len,1 << dwidth) - ?at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg) + ? dwidth :AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_BYTE ; desc->lld.mbr_ubc =AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDV2 /* next descriptor view */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDEN /* next descriptor dst parameter update */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NSEN /* next descriptor src parameter update */ | (len >> fixed_dwidth);/* microblock length */ + desc->lld.mbr_cfg = (atchan->cfg & ~AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_MASK ) | +AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH (fixed_dwidth);dev_dbg (chan2dev (chan),"%s: lld: mbr_sa=%pad, mbr_da=%pad, mbr_ubc=0x%08x\n" , __func__, &desc->lld.mbr_sa, &desc->lld.mbr_da, desc->lld.mbr_ubc);
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Ludovic Desroches
Hi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:27:56PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
I have tried to cherry-pick it on 4.1.4 and even on the fresh 4.1.5 and I have no conflict.
Can you tell me on top of which commit I have to pick this patch in order to get the conflict and fix it.
It doesn't apply for me on top of 4.1.5 with a simple 'patch' command:
$ patch -p1 < ../dmaengine-at_xdmac-fix-transfer-data-width-in-at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg.patch patching file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 682. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c.rej
How did 'cherry-pick' do it better? Can you send me the result of the git diff after 'cherry-pick' succeeded and I'll look to see what made it work properly...
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 14 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 11 lines · Ludovic Desroches
Hi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:27:56PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
I have tried to cherry-pick it on 4.1.4 and even on the fresh 4.1.5 and I have no conflict.
Can you tell me on top of which commit I have to pick this patch in order to get the conflict and fix it.
It doesn't apply for me on top of 4.1.5 with a simple 'patch' command:
Quoted 8 lines
$ patch -p1 < ../dmaengine-at_xdmac-fix-transfer-data-width-in-at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg.patch patching file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 682. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c.rejHow did 'cherry-pick' do it better? Can you send me the result of the git diff after 'cherry-pick' succeeded and I'll look to see what made it work properly...
It's not the first time I get this behavior.
$ git-log|head -n1 352cb86 Linux 4.1.5 Greg Kroah-Hartman $ git cherry-pick 1c8a38b1268a [ludo/v4.1.5_xdmac 6807c71] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg() Author: Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 30 14:36:57 2015 +0200 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Patch attached.
Regards
Ludovic
commit 6807c714fe1e319bdb24e33684facddae7e3100b
Author: Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 30 14:36:57 2015 +0200
dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg()
This patch adds the missing update of the transfer data width in at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg().
Indeed, for each item in the scatter-gather list, we check whether the transfer length is aligned with the data width provided by dmaengine_slave_config(). If so, we directly use this data width for the current part of the transfer we are preparing. Otherwise, the data width is reduced to 8 bits (1 byte). Of course, the actual number of register accesses must also be updated to match the new data width.
So one chunk was missing in the original patch (see Fixes tag below): the number of register accesses was correctly set to (len >> fixed_dwidth) in mbr_ubc but the real data width was not updated in mbr_cfg. Since mbr_cfg may change for each part of the scatter-gather transfer this also explains why the original patch used the Descriptor View 2 instead of the Descriptor View 1.
Let's take the example of a DMA transfer to write 8bit data into an Atmel USART with FIFOs. When FIFOs are enabled in the USART, its Transmit Holding Register (THR) works in multidata mode, that is to say that up to 4 8bit data can be written into the THR in a single 32bit access and it is still possible to write only one data with a 8bit access. To take advantage of this new feature, the DMA driver was modified to allow multiple dwidths when doing slave transfers.
For instance, when the total length is 22 bytes, the USART driver splits the transfer into 2 parts:
First part: 20 bytes transferred through 5 32bit writes into THR Second part: 2 bytes transferred though 2 8bit writes into THR
For the second part, the data width was first set to 4_BYTES by the USART driver thanks to dmaengine_slave_config() then at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg() reduces this data width to 1_BYTE because the 2 byte length is not aligned with the original 4_BYTES data width. Since the data width is modified, the actual number of writes into THR must be set accordingly.
drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c +4 -3
@@ -648,16 +648,17 @@ at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl, desc->lld.mbr_sa = mem; desc->lld.mbr_da = atchan->sconfig.dst_addr; } - desc->lld.mbr_cfg = atchan->cfg; - dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg); + dwidth =at_xdmac_get_dwidth (atchan->cfg); fixed_dwidth =IS_ALIGNED (len,1 << dwidth) - ?at_xdmac_get_dwidth (desc->lld.mbr_cfg) + ? dwidth :AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_BYTE ; desc->lld.mbr_ubc =AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDV2 /* next descriptor view */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDEN /* next descriptor dst parameter update */ |AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NSEN /* next descriptor src parameter update */ | (i == sg_len -1 ?0 :AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDE )/* descriptor fetch */ | (len >> fixed_dwidth);/* microblock length */ + desc->lld.mbr_cfg = (atchan->cfg & ~AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH_MASK ) | +AT_XDMAC_CC_DWIDTH (fixed_dwidth);dev_dbg (chan2dev (chan),"%s: lld: mbr_sa=%pad, mbr_da=%pad, mbr_ubc=0x%08x\n" , __func__, &desc->lld.mbr_sa, &desc->lld.mbr_da, desc->lld.mbr_ubc);
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 35 lines · Ludovic Desroches
Quoted 14 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 11 lines · Ludovic Desroches
Hi Greg,
Quoted 2 lines · On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:27:56PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
I have tried to cherry-pick it on 4.1.4 and even on the fresh 4.1.5 and I have no conflict.
Can you tell me on top of which commit I have to pick this patch in order to get the conflict and fix it.
It doesn't apply for me on top of 4.1.5 with a simple 'patch' command:
Quoted 8 lines
$ patch -p1 < ../dmaengine-at_xdmac-fix-transfer-data-width-in-at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg.patch patching file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 682. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c.rejHow did 'cherry-pick' do it better? Can you send me the result of the git diff after 'cherry-pick' succeeded and I'll look to see what made it work properly...
It's not the first time I get this behavior.
$ git-log|head -n1 352cb86 Linux 4.1.5 Greg Kroah-Hartman $ git cherry-pick 1c8a38b1268a [ludo/v4.1.5_xdmac 6807c71] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix transfer data width in at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg() Author: Cyrille Pitchen <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jun 30 14:36:57 2015 +0200 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Quoted 1 line
Patch attached.
Thanks, now applied.
greg k-h
Quoted 2 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 1 line · Ludovic Desroches
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:41:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
[...]
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Patch attached.
Thanks, now applied.
Great, thanks.
Quoted 2 lines
greg k-h
Ludovic