FAILED: patch "[PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()" failed to apply to 3.14-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
b8a9d66d043ffac116100775a469f05f5158c16fMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:53:50 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()
After commit 566c09c53455 ("raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()") __find_stripe() is called under conf->hash_locks + hash.
But handle_stripe_clean_event() calls remove_hash() under conf->device_lock.
Under some cirscumstances the hash chain can be circuited, and we get an infinite loop with disabled interrupts and locked hash lock in __find_stripe(). This leads to hard lockup on multiple CPUs and following system crash.
I was able to reproduce this behavior on raid6 over 6 ssd disks. The devices_handle_discard_safely option should be set to enable trim support. The following script was used:
for i in seq 1 32; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=large$i bs=10M count=100 &
done
neilb: original was against a 3.x kernel. I forward-ported
to 4.3-rc. This verison is suitable for any kernel since
Commit: 59fc630b8b5f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write") (v4.1+). I'll post a version for earlier kernels to stable.
drivers/md/raid5.c +4 -2
@@ -3499,6 +3499,7 @@ returnbi: }if (!discard_pending &&test_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags)) { +int hash;clear_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);clear_bit (R5_UPTODATE , &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);if (sh->qd_idx >=0 ) {
@@ -3512,16 +3513,17 @@ returnbi:* no updated data, so remove it from hash list and the stripe * will be reinitialized */ -spin_lock_irq (&conf->device_lock); unhash: + hash = sh->hash_lock_index; +spin_lock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);remove_hash (sh); +spin_unlock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);if (head_sh->batch_head) { sh =list_first_entry (&sh->batch_list, struct stripe_head, batch_list);if (sh != head_sh) goto unhash; } -spin_unlock_irq (&conf->device_lock); sh = head_sh;if (test_bit (STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED , &sh->state))
PATCH 1/1 md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()
commit b8a9d66d043ffac116100775a469f05f5158c16f upstream.
After commit 566c09c53455 ("raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()") __find_stripe() is called under conf->hash_locks + hash.
But handle_stripe_clean_event() calls remove_hash() under conf->device_lock.
Under some cirscumstances the hash chain can be circuited, and we get an infinite loop with disabled interrupts and locked hash lock in __find_stripe(). This leads to hard lockup on multiple CPUs and following system crash.
I was able to reproduce this behavior on raid6 over 6 ssd disks. The devices_handle_discard_safely option should be set to enable trim support. The following script was used:
for i in seq 1 32; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=large$i bs=10M count=100 &
done
--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/md/raid5.c +4 -2
@@ -3029,6 +3029,8 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf, }if (!discard_pending &&test_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags)) { +int hash = sh->hash_lock_index; +clear_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);clear_bit (R5_UPTODATE , &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);if (sh->qd_idx >=0 ) {
@@ -3042,9 +3044,9 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,* no updated data, so remove it from hash list and the stripe * will be reinitialized */ -spin_lock_irq (&conf->device_lock); +spin_lock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);remove_hash (sh); -spin_unlock_irq (&conf->device_lock); +spin_unlock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);if (test_bit (STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED , &sh->state))set_bit (STRIPE_HANDLE , &sh->state);
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
Re: [PATCH] md/raid5: fix locking in handle_stripe_clean_event()
Quoted 2 lines · Roman Gushchin
commit
b8a9d66d043ffac116100775a469f05f5158c16fupstream.
Thanks, I'll use this backport for the 3.16 kernel as well.
Cheers,
--
Lu�s
Quoted 60 lines
After commit
566c09c53455("raid5: relieve lock contention inget_active_stripe()")__find_stripe()is called underconf->hash_locks+ hash.
Buthandle_stripe_clean_event()callsremove_hash()underconf->device_lock.Under some cirscumstances the hash chain can be circuited, and we get an infinite loop with disabled interrupts and locked hash lock in
__find_stripe(). This leads to hard lockup on multiple CPUs and following system crash.I was able to reproduce this behavior on raid6 over 6 ssd disks. The
devices_handle_discard_safelyoption should be set to enable trim support. The following script was used:for i in
seq 1 32; dodd if=/dev/zero of=large$i bs=10M count=100 &done
Signed-off-by Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>Fixes 566c09c53455 ("raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()")Signed-off-by NeilBrown <[email protected]>Cc Shaohua Li <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # 3.13 - 4.2--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/md/raid5.c +4
-2@@ -3029,6 +3029,8 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf, }if (!discard_pending &&test_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags)) { +int hash = sh->hash_lock_index; +clear_bit (R5_Discard, &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);clear_bit (R5_UPTODATE , &sh->dev[sh->pd_idx].flags);if (sh->qd_idx >=0 ) {@@ -3042,9 +3044,9 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(struct r5conf *conf,* no updated data, so remove it from hash list and the stripe * will be reinitialized */ -spin_lock_irq (&conf->device_lock); +spin_lock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);remove_hash (sh); -spin_unlock_irq (&conf->device_lock); +spin_unlock_irq (conf->hash_locks + hash);if (test_bit (STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED , &sh->state))set_bit (STRIPE_HANDLE , &sh->state);Signature · 6 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html