valgrind: update to 3.11.0 + fixes
v3 cover valgrind: update to 3.11.0 + fixes
Rebase Alexander's valgrind 3.11.0 update patch to current oe-core master (remove redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg line) plus fix additional issues.
This time based on v2 of Alexander's 3.11.0 update patch...
Alexander Kanavin (1):
valgrind: update to 3.11.0
Andre McCurdy (3):
security_flags.inc: disable -fstack-protector-XXX for valgrind
valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
valgrind: include aarch64 in COMPATIBLE_HOST
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 2 +-
...able-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch | 35 ---
.../valgrind/valgrind/0002-remove-rpath.patch | 35 +++
.../valgrind/0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch | 175 +++++++++++++++
...vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch} | 87 ++++----
.../valgrind/enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch | 37 ----
.../valgrind/valgrind/force-nostabs.patch | 42 ----
.../recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/glibc.patch | 44 ----
.../pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch | 68 ------
.../valgrind/remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch | 75 -------
.../valgrind/valgrind/sepbuildfix.patch | 235 ---------------------
.../{valgrind_3.10.1.bb => valgrind_3.11.0.bb} | 42 ++--
12 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 599 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0001-valgrind-Enable-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0002-remove-rpath.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/{add-ptest.patch => 0005-Modify-vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch} (80%)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/force-nostabs.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/glibc.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/sepbuildfix.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/{valgrind_3.10.1.bb => valgrind_3.11.0.bb} (72%)Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH v3 1/4 valgrind: update to 3.11.0
From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
LICENSE checksums are changed due to a change in FSF address, or copyright years update.
Rebased patches:
sepbuildfix.patch rebased to 0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch add-ptest.patch rebased to 0005-Modify-vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch
Removed patches:
force-nostabs.patch removed because it's patching lines that have been removed upstream remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch removed because it no longer applies, and rebasing it requires building with special ppc32 machine configurations; qemuppc build is fine without it. enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch removed because the problem is fixed upstream glibc.patch removed for the same reason
Removed backports:
pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch 0001-valgrind-Enable-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch
---
...able-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch | 35 ---
.../valgrind/valgrind/0002-remove-rpath.patch | 35 +++
.../valgrind/0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch | 175 +++++++++++++++
...vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch} | 87 ++++----
.../valgrind/enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch | 37 ----
.../valgrind/valgrind/force-nostabs.patch | 42 ----
.../recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/glibc.patch | 44 ----
.../pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch | 68 ------
.../valgrind/remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch | 75 -------
.../valgrind/valgrind/sepbuildfix.patch | 235 ---------------------
.../{valgrind_3.10.1.bb => valgrind_3.11.0.bb} | 34 ++-
11 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 595 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0001-valgrind-Enable-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0002-remove-rpath.patch
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/{add-ptest.patch => 0005-Modify-vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch} (80%)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/force-nostabs.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/glibc.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/sepbuildfix.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/{valgrind_3.10.1.bb => valgrind_3.11.0.bb} (77%)meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0001-valgrind-Enable-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch deleted +0 -35
@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@ -From 1a8006f56342dae9f7100a3c33d80873676e0404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Li Zhou <[email protected]> -Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 03:55:18 -0400 -Subject: [PATCH] valgrind: Enable rt_sigpending syscall on ppc64 linux - -New Revision: 15133 -Enable rt_sigpending syscall on ppc64 linux. -Patch from Thomas Huth <[email protected]> - -Get the patch from valgrind upstream: -http://valgrind.10908.n7.nabble.com/Valgrind-r15133-in-trunk-NEWS-coregrind-m-syswrap-syswrap-ppc64-linux-c-td54589.html - -Upstream-Status: backport - -Signed-off-by: Li Zhou <[email protected]> ---- - coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c | 2 +- - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c b/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c -index 5946ee1..8aaa1d7 100644 ---- a/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c -+++ b/coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c -@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static SyscallTableEntry syscall_table[] = { - LINXY(__NR_rt_sigaction, sys_rt_sigaction), // 173 - LINXY(__NR_rt_sigprocmask, sys_rt_sigprocmask), // 174 - --// _____(__NR_rt_sigpending, sys_rt_sigpending), // 175 -+ LINXY(__NR_rt_sigpending, sys_rt_sigpending), // 175 - LINXY(__NR_rt_sigtimedwait, sys_rt_sigtimedwait), // 176 - LINXY(__NR_rt_sigqueueinfo, sys_rt_sigqueueinfo), // 177 - LINX_(__NR_rt_sigsuspend, sys_rt_sigsuspend), // 178 --- -1.9.1 -
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0002-remove-rpath.patch new file +35 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +From f96cf1f4eaa72860ab8b5e18ad10fdc704d78c5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> +Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:01:34 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 2/5] remove rpath + +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [embedded config] +Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]> +--- + none/tests/Makefile.am | 3 +-- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/none/tests/Makefile.am b/none/tests/Makefile.am +index 54f2a7e..25b0f49 100644 +--- a/none/tests/Makefile.am ++++ b/none/tests/Makefile.am +@@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ threadederrno_CFLAGS += --std=c99 + endif + tls_SOURCES = tls.c tls2.c + tls_DEPENDENCIES = tls.so tls2.so +-tls_LDFLAGS = -Wl,-rpath,$(abs_top_builddir)/none/tests + tls_LDADD = tls.so tls2.so -lpthread + tls_so_SOURCES = tls_so.c + tls_so_DEPENDENCIES = tls2.so +@@ -334,7 +333,7 @@ if VGCONF_OS_IS_DARWIN + tls_so_LDFLAGS = -dynamic -dynamiclib -all_load -fpic + tls_so_LDADD = `pwd`/tls2.so + else +- tls_so_LDFLAGS = -Wl,-rpath,$(abs_top_builddir)/none/tests -shared -fPIC ++ tls_so_LDFLAGS = -shared -fPIC + tls_so_LDADD = tls2.so + endif + tls_so_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) -fPIC +-- +2.6.2 +
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch new file +175 -0
175 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/0005-Modify-vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch renamed from meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/add-ptest.patch +48 -39
212 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch deleted +0 -37
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ -Enable building valgrind on host with 4.x kernel. - -For OpenEmbedded builds we should be checking something like -OLDEST_KERNEL instead of `uname -r`, but this is good enough for now. - -Building on 4.x* currently fails with: - configure:5556: checking for the kernel version - configure:5579: result: unsupported (4.0.0-rc3-00111-gaffb817) - configure:5581: error: Valgrind works on kernels 2.4, 2.6 - -Upstream-Status: Pending -Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> - ---- valgrind-3.9.0/configure.ac.orig 2015-03-13 19:17:01.247310868 +0100 -+++ valgrind-3.9.0/configure.ac 2015-03-13 19:19:27.388316108 +0100 -@@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ - kernel=`uname -r` - - case "${kernel}" in -- 2.6.*|3.*) -- AC_MSG_RESULT([2.6.x/3.x family (${kernel})]) -- AC_DEFINE([KERNEL_2_6], 1, [Define to 1 if you're using Linux 2.6.x or Linux 3.x]) -+ 2.6.*|3.*|4.*) -+ AC_MSG_RESULT([2.6.x/3.x/4.x family (${kernel})]) -+ AC_DEFINE([KERNEL_2_6], 1, [Define to 1 if you're using Linux 2.6.x or Linux 3.x or Linux 4.x]) - ;; - - 2.4.*) -@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ - - *) - AC_MSG_RESULT([unsupported (${kernel})]) -- AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind works on kernels 2.4, 2.6]) -+ AC_MSG_ERROR([Valgrind works on kernels 2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x]) - ;; - esac -
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/force-nostabs.patch deleted +0 -42
42 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/glibc.patch deleted +0 -44
44 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch deleted +0 -68
68 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch deleted +0 -75
75 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind/sepbuildfix.patch deleted +0 -235
235 lines not on this page · raw message
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb renamed from meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.10.1.bb +14 -20
@@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ SUMMARY = "Valgrind memory debugger and instrumentation framework" HOMEPAGE = "http://valgrind.org/" BUGTRACKER = "http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html" LICENSE = "GPLv2 & GPLv2+ & BSD" -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=c46082167a314d785d012a244748d803 \ - file://include/pub_tool_basics.h;beginline=1;endline=29;md5=e7071929a50d4b0fc27a3014b315b0f7 \ - file://include/valgrind.h;beginline=1;endline=56;md5=92df8a1bde56fe2af70931ff55f6622f \ - file://COPYING.DOCS;md5=8fdeb5abdb235a08e76835f8f3260215" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \ + file://include/pub_tool_basics.h;beginline=1;endline=29;md5=ebb8e640ef633f940c425686c873f9fa \ + file://include/valgrind.h;beginline=1;endline=56;md5=4b5e24908e53016ea561c45f4234a327 \ + file://COPYING.DOCS;md5=24ea4c7092233849b4394699333b5c56" X11DEPENDS = "virtual/libx11" DEPENDS = "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '${X11DEPENDS}', '', d)} \
@@ -15,28 +15,20 @@ DEPENDS = "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '${X11DEPENDS}', '', d SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ file://fixed-perl-path.patch \ file://Added-support-for-PPC-instructions-mfatbu-mfatbl.patch \ - file://sepbuildfix.patch \ - file://glibc.patch \ - file://force-nostabs.patch \ file://remove-arm-variant-specific.patch \ - file://remove-ppc-tests-failing-build.patch \ - file://valgrind-remove-rpath.patch \ - file://enable.building.on.4.x.kernel.patch \ - file://add-ptest.patch \ - file://pass-maltivec-only-if-it-supported.patch \ file://run-ptest \ - file://0001-valgrind-Enable-rt_sigpending-syscall-on-ppc64-linux.patch \ file://11_mips-link-tool.patch \ - " + file://0002-remove-rpath.patch \ + file://0004-Fix-out-of-tree-builds.patch \ + file://0005-Modify-vg_test-wrapper-to-support-PTEST-formats.patch \ + " -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "60ddae962bc79e7c95cfc4667245707f" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "fa253dc26ddb661b6269df58144eff607ea3f76a9bcfe574b0c7726e1dfcb997" +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42" COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' -PR = "r1" - inherit autotools ptest EXTRA_OECONF = "--enable-tls --without-mpicc"
@@ -56,11 +48,14 @@ RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "${TCLIBC}-dbg" RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest += " sed perl glibc-utils perl-module-file-glob" +# One of the tests contains a bogus interpreter path on purpose, and QA +# check complains about it +INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-ptest += "file-rdeps" + do_compile_ptest() { oe_runmake check CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -O0" CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS} -O0" } - do_install_ptest() { chmod +x ${B}/tests/vg_regtest
@@ -101,4 +96,3 @@ do_install_ptest() { # handle multilib sed -i s:@libdir@:${libdir}:g ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/run-ptest } -
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH v3 2/4 security_flags.inc: disable -fstack-protector-XXX for valgrind
In reply to Andre McCurdyValgrind (v3.11.0) expects to build with stack protection disabled and includes -fno-stack-protector in its default CFLAGS. However, the CFLAGS provided by OE are included on the compiler command line after the defaults so any -fstack-protector-all / -fstack-protector-strong option provided by security_flags.inc will cause problems.
| .../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:892: undefined reference to __stack_chk_guard' | .../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:947: undefined reference to __stack_chk_fail'
--- meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +1 -1
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-numpy = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python3 = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tcl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tiff = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" -SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = "" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-zlib = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" # These 2 have text relco errors with the pie options enabled
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH 2/4 v3] security_flags.inc: disable -fstack-protector-XXX for valgrind
Quoted 25 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind (v3.11.0) expects to build with stack protection disabled and includes -fno-stack-protector in its default CFLAGS. However, the CFLAGS provided by OE are included on the compiler command line after the defaults so any -fstack-protector-all / -fstack-protector-strong option provided by security_flags.inc will cause problems.
|
.../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:892: undefined reference to__stack_chk_guard' | .../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:947: undefined reference to__stack_chk_fail'Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +0
-0@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-numpy = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python3 = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tcl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tiff = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
Quoted 2 lines
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +1
-1-SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = “"
Can we instead add -lssp to LDFLAGS ?
Quoted 11 lines
SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-zlib = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
# These 2 have text relco errors with the pie options enabled --
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 2/4 v3] security_flags.inc: disable -fstack-protector-XXX for valgrind
Quoted 17 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 17 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind (v3.11.0) expects to build with stack protection disabled and includes -fno-stack-protector in its default CFLAGS. However, the CFLAGS provided by OE are included on the compiler command line after the defaults so any -fstack-protector-all / -fstack-protector-strong option provided by security_flags.inc will cause problems.
|
.../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:892: undefined reference to__stack_chk_guard' | .../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:947: undefined reference to__stack_chk_fail'Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Quoted 12 lines
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
Quoted 10 lines
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +0
-0@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-numpy = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python3 = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tcl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tiff = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +1
-1-SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = “"Can we instead add -lssp to LDFLAGS ?
Probably. Valgrind deliberately adds -fno-stack-protector to it's own CFLAGS though, so by forcing it to use the stack protector you would be going against the wishes of the Valgrind developers.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-zlib = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
# These 2 have text relco errors with the pie options enabled --
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 2/4 v3] security_flags.inc: disable -fstack-protector-XXX for valgrind
Quoted 34 lines · Andre McCurdy
Quoted 17 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 17 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind (v3.11.0) expects to build with stack protection disabled and includes -fno-stack-protector in its default CFLAGS. However, the CFLAGS provided by OE are included on the compiler command line after the defaults so any -fstack-protector-all / -fstack-protector-strong option provided by security_flags.inc will cause problems.
|
.../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:892: undefined reference to__stack_chk_guard' | .../build-bcm97425vms/tmp/work/mips32el-rdk-linux/valgrind/3.11.0-r0/valgrind-3.11.0/coregrind/m_mallocfree.c:947: undefined reference to__stack_chk_fail'Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 2 +-1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Quoted 12 lines
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
Quoted 10 lines
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +0
-0@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python-numpy = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-python3 = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tcl = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-tiff = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc +1
-1-SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}" +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-valgrind = “"Can we instead add -lssp to LDFLAGS ?
Quoted 3 lines
Probably. Valgrind deliberately adds -fno-stack-protector to it's own CFLAGS though, so by forcing it to use the stack protector you would be going against the wishes of the Valgrind developers.
I think you are right in this case.
PATCH v3 3/4 valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
In reply to Andre McCurdyValgrind has been tested on armv5te/qemuarm, so it seems that valgrind's configure check for armv7 is over cautious.
--- meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +5 -3
@@ -26,14 +26,16 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129" SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42" -COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' -COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' inherit autotools ptest EXTRA_OECONF = "--enable-tls --without-mpicc" -EXTRA_OECONF_armv7a = "--enable-tls -host=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi --without-mpicc" EXTRA_OECONF += "${@['--enable-only32bit','--enable-only64bit'][d.getVar('SITEINFO_BITS', True) != '32']}" + +# valgrind checks host_cpu "armv7*)", so we need to over-ride the autotools.bbclass default --host option +EXTRA_OECONF_append_arm = " --host=armv7${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}" + EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-w" do_install_append () {
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
Quoted 28 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind has been tested on armv5te/qemuarm, so it seems that valgrind's configure check for armv7 is over cautious.
Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 8 +++++---1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +0
-0@@ -26,14 +26,16 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \SRC_URI[md5sum] = "
4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +1
-2-COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' -COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux'inherit autotools ptest
EXTRA_OECONF= "--enable-tls --without-mpicc"
-EXTRA_OECONF_armv7a = "--enable-tls -host=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi --without-mpicc"EXTRA_OECONF+= "${@['--enable-only32bit','--enable-only64bit'][d.getVar('SITEINFO_BITS', True) != '32']}"
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
Quoted 3 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +3
-0+ +# valgrind checks host_cpu "armv7*)", so we need to over-ride the autotools.bbclass default --host option +EXTRA_OECONF_append_arm = " --host=armv7${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}”
this could be problematic for arm < v7
Quoted 13 lines
+
EXTRA_OEMAKE= "-w"
do_install_append() {
--
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
Quoted 25 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 25 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind has been tested on armv5te/qemuarm, so it seems that valgrind's configure check for armv7 is over cautious.
Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 8 +++++---1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +0
-0@@ -26,14 +26,16 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \SRC_URI[md5sum] = "
4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +1
-2-COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' -COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux'inherit autotools ptest
Quoted 8 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
Quoted 6 lines
EXTRA_OECONF= "--enable-tls --without-mpicc"
-EXTRA_OECONF_armv7a = "--enable-tls -host=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi --without-mpicc"EXTRA_OECONF+= "${@['--enable-only32bit','--enable-only64bit'][d.getVar('SITEINFO_BITS', True) != '32']}"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +3
-0+ +# valgrind checks host_cpu "armv7*)", so we need to over-ride the autotools.bbclass default --host option +EXTRA_OECONF_append_arm = " --host=armv7${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}”this could be problematic for arm < v7
The configure script will give an error if ${host_cpu} doesn't begin with "armv7", so we either have to provide this kind of fake --host option or patch the configure script.
Do you think patching the configure script would be better ?
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 12 lines
EXTRA_OEMAKE= "-w"
do_install_append() {
--
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
Quoted 38 lines · Andre McCurdy
Quoted 25 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 25 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind has been tested on armv5te/qemuarm, so it seems that valgrind's configure check for armv7 is over cautious.
Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 8 +++++---1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +0
-0@@ -26,14 +26,16 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \SRC_URI[md5sum] = "
4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +1
-2-COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' -COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux'inherit autotools ptest
Quoted 8 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
Quoted 6 lines
EXTRA_OECONF= "--enable-tls --without-mpicc"
-EXTRA_OECONF_armv7a = "--enable-tls -host=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi --without-mpicc"EXTRA_OECONF+= "${@['--enable-only32bit','--enable-only64bit'][d.getVar('SITEINFO_BITS', True) != '32']}"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +3
-0+ +# valgrind checks host_cpu "armv7*)", so we need to over-ride the autotools.bbclass default --host option +EXTRA_OECONF_append_arm = " --host=armv7${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}”this could be problematic for arm < v7
Quoted 3 lines
The configure script will give an error if ${host_cpu} doesn't begin with "armv7", so we either have to provide this kind of fake --host option or patch the configure script.
How is it working right now ?
Quoted 2 lines
Do you think patching the configure script would be better ?
that could be better since we will get failure.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 13 lines
EXTRA_OEMAKE= "-w"
do_install_append() {
--
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3] valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a
Quoted 38 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 38 lines · Andre McCurdy
Quoted 33 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 28 lines · Andre McCurdy
Valgrind has been tested on armv5te/qemuarm, so it seems that valgrind's configure check for armv7 is over cautious.
Signed-off-by Andre McCurdy <[email protected]>---
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 8 +++++---1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +0
-0@@ -26,14 +26,16 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \SRC_URI[md5sum] = "
4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +1
-2-COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' -COMPATIBLE_HOST_armv7a = 'arm.*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux'inherit autotools ptest
EXTRA_OECONF= "--enable-tls --without-mpicc"
-EXTRA_OECONF_armv7a = "--enable-tls -host=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi --without-mpicc"EXTRA_OECONF+= "${@['--enable-only32bit','--enable-only64bit'][d.getVar('SITEINFO_BITS', True) != '32']}"meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
Quoted 3 lines
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +3
-0+ +# valgrind checks host_cpu "armv7*)", so we need to over-ride the autotools.bbclass default --host option +EXTRA_OECONF_append_arm = " --host=armv7${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}”this could be problematic for arm < v7
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The configure script will give an error if ${host_cpu} doesn't begin with "armv7", so we either have to provide this kind of fake --host option or patch the configure script.
How is it working right now ?
Up to now the recipe has been forcing "--host=armv7-..." via EXTRA_OECONF. That hasn't changed.
The thing that's changed is that previously you couldn't build for any ARM target other than armv7a, now you can.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Do you think patching the configure script would be better ?
that could be better since we will get failure.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 13 lines
EXTRA_OEMAKE= "-w"
do_install_append() {
--
1.9.1--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
PATCH v3 4/4 valgrind: include aarch64 in COMPATIBLE_HOST
In reply to Andre McCurdyValgrind has supported aarch64 since v3.10.0.
--- meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.11.0.bb +1 -1
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/valgrind-${PV}.tar.bz2 \ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4ea62074da73ae82e0162d6550d3f129" SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6c396271a8c1ddd5a6fb9abe714ea1e8a86fce85b30ab26b4266aeb4c2413b42" -COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(i.86|x86_64|arm|aarch64|mips|powerpc|powerpc64).*-linux' inherit autotools ptest
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1