Patch "net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-add-sysctl_max_skb_frags.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From foo@baz Mon Feb 29 14:33:50 PST 2016
From: Hans Westgaard Ry <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:26:57 +0100
Subject: net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Hans Westgaard Ry <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit 5f74f82ea34c0da80ea0b49192bb5ea06e063593 ]
Devices may have limits on the number of fragments in an skb they support. Current codebase uses a constant as maximum for number of fragments one skb can hold and use.
When enabling scatter/gather and running traffic with many small messages the codebase uses the maximum number of fragments and may thereby violate the max for certain devices.
The patch introduces a global variable as max number of fragments.
--- include/linux/skbuff.h | 1 + net/core/skbuff.c | 2 ++ net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 10 ++++++++++ net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/linux/skbuff.h +1 -0
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct sk_buff;#else #define MAX_SKB_FRAGS (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 1)#endif +extern int sysctl_max_skb_frags;typedef struct skb_frag_struct skb_frag_t ;
net/core/skbuff.c +2 -0
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@struct kmem_cache *skbuff_head_cache__read_mostly ;static struct kmem_cache *skbuff_fclone_cache__read_mostly ; +int sysctl_max_skb_frags__read_mostly =MAX_SKB_FRAGS ; +EXPORT_SYMBOL (sysctl_max_skb_frags);/** * skb_panic - private function for out-of-line support
net/core/sysctl_net_core.c +10 -0
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static int zero = 0;static int one =1 ;static int min_sndbuf =SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF ;static int min_rcvbuf =SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF ; +static int max_skb_frags =MAX_SKB_FRAGS ;static int net_msg_warn;/* Unused, but still a sysctl */
@@ -392,6 +393,15 @@ static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = proc_dointvec }, + { + .procname = "max_skb_frags", + .data = &sysctl_max_skb_frags, + .maxlen = sizeof(int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax, + .extra1 = &one, + .extra2 = &max_skb_frags, + }, { } };
net/ipv4/tcp.c +2 -2
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ new_segment: i =skb_shinfo (skb)->nr_frags; can_coalesce =skb_can_coalesce (skb, i, page, offset); -if (!can_coalesce && i >=MAX_SKB_FRAGS ) { +if (!can_coalesce && i >= sysctl_max_skb_frags) {tcp_mark_push (tp, skb); goto new_segment; }
@@ -1212,7 +1212,7 @@ new_segment:if (!skb_can_coalesce (skb, i, pfrag->page, pfrag->offset)) { -if (i ==MAX_SKB_FRAGS || !sg) { +if (i == sysctl_max_skb_frags || !sg) {tcp_mark_push (tp, skb); goto new_segment; }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.4/net-add-sysctl_max_skb_frags.patch