FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Break busywaiting for requests on pending signals" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
91b0c352ace9afec1fb51590c7b8bd60e0eb9fbdMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:32:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Break busywaiting for requests on pending signals
The busywait in __i915_spin_request() does not respect pending signals and so may consume the entire timeslice for the task instead of returning to userspace to handle the signal.
In the worst case this could cause a delay in signal processing of 20ms, which would be a noticeable jitter in cursor tracking. If a higher resolution signal was being used, for example to provide fairness of a server timeslices between clients, we could expect to detect some unfairness between clients (i.e. some windows not updating as fast as others). This issue was noticed when inspecting a report of poor interactivity resulting from excessively high __i915_spin_request usage.
Fixes regression from
commit 2def4ad99befa25775dd2f714fdd4d92faec6e34 [v4.2]
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Date: Tue Apr 7 16:20:41 2015 +0100
drm/i915: Optimistically spin for the request completion
v2: Try to assess the impact of the bug
Cc; "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" <[email protected]>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +8 -5
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ static bool missed_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,return test_bit (ring->id, &dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings); } -static int __i915_spin_request (struct drm_i915_gem_request *req) +static int __i915_spin_request (struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,int state) {unsigned long timeout;
@@ -1158,6 +1158,9 @@ static int __i915_spin_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)if (i915_gem_request_completed (req, true))return 0 ; +if (signal_pending_state (state, current)) +break ; +if (time_after_eq (jiffies, timeout))break ;
@@ -1197,6 +1200,7 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;const bool irq_test_in_progress =ACCESS_ONCE (dev_priv->gpu_error.test_irq_rings) &intel_ring_flag (ring); +int state = interruptible ?TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE :TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE ;DEFINE_WAIT (wait);unsigned long timeout_expire;s64 before, now;
@@ -1229,7 +1233,7 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, before =ktime_get_raw_ns ();/* Optimistic spin for the next jiffie before touching IRQs */ - ret =__i915_spin_request (req); + ret =__i915_spin_request (req, state);if (ret ==0 ) goto out;
@@ -1241,8 +1245,7 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,for (;;) {struct timer_list timer; -prepare_to_wait (&ring->irq_queue, &wait, - interruptible ?TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE :TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE ); +prepare_to_wait (&ring->irq_queue, &wait, state);/* We need to check whether any gpu reset happened in between * the caller grabbing the seqno and now ... */
@@ -1260,7 +1263,7 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,break ; } -if (interruptible &&signal_pending (current)) { +if (signal_pending_state (state, current)) { ret = -ERESTARTSYS ;break ; }