Patch "drm: Fix treatment of drm_vblank_offdelay in drm_vblank_on() (v2)" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm: Fix treatment of drm_vblank_offdelay in drm_vblank_on() (v2)
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-fix-treatment-of-drm_vblank_offdelay-in-drm_vblank_on-v2.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
bb74fc1bf3072bd3ab4ed5f43afd287a63baf2d7Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mario Kleiner <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 20:30:30 +0100
Subject: drm: Fix treatment of drm_vblank_offdelay in drm_vblank_on() (v2)
From: Mario Kleiner <[email protected]>
commit bb74fc1bf3072bd3ab4ed5f43afd287a63baf2d7 upstream.
drm_vblank_offdelay can have three different types of values:
< 0 is to be always treated the same as dev->vblank_disable_immediate = 0 is to be treated as "never disable vblanks"
Quoted 1 line
0 is to be treated as disable immediate if kms driver wants it
that way via dev->vblank_disable_immediate. Otherwise it is a disable timeout in msecs.
This got broken in Linux 3.18+ for the implementation of drm_vblank_on. If the user specified a value of zero which should always reenable vblank irqs in this function, a kms driver could override the users choice by setting vblank_disable_immediate to true. This patch fixes the regression and keeps the user in control.
v2: Only reenable vblank if there are clients left or the user
requested to "never disable vblanks" via offdelay 0. Enabling vblanks even in the "delayed disable" case (offdelay > 0) was specifically added by Ville in commit cd19e52aee922 ("drm: Kick start vblank interrupts at drm_vblank_on()"), but after discussion it turns out that this was done by accident.
Citing Ville: "I think it just ended up as a mess due to changing some of the semantics of offdelay<0 vs. offdelay==0 vs. disable_immediate during the review of the series. So yeah, given how drm_vblank_put() works now, I'd just make this check for offdelay==0."
--- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c +1 -2
@@ -1494,8 +1494,7 @@ void drm_vblank_on(struct drm_device *de* re-enable interrupts if there are users left, or the * user wishes vblank interrupts to be enabled all the time. */ -if (atomic_read (&vblank->refcount) !=0 || - (!dev->vblank_disable_immediate && drm_vblank_offdelay ==0 )) +if (atomic_read (&vblank->refcount) !=0 || drm_vblank_offdelay ==0 )WARN_ON (drm_vblank_enable (dev, pipe));spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags); }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.4/drm-prevent-vblank-counter-bumps-1-with-active-vblank-clients.-v2.patch queue-4.4/drm-fix-treatment-of-drm_vblank_offdelay-in-drm_vblank_on-v2.patch queue-4.4/drm-nouveau-display-enable-vblank-irqs-after-display-engine-is-on-again.patch queue-4.4/drm-fix-drm_vblank_pre-post_modeset-regression-from-linux-4.4.patch queue-4.4/drm-radeon-don-t-hang-in-radeon_flip_work_func-on-disabled-crtc.-v2.patch queue-4.4/drm-no-op-redundant-calls-to-drm_vblank_off-v2.patch queue-4.4/drm-amdgpu-don-t-hang-in-amdgpu_flip_work_func-on-disabled-crtc.patch