fsl: esdhc: consolidate fsl_esdhc_cfg structure
PATCH 1/2 fsl: esdhc: consolidate fsl_esdhc_cfg structure
We can use phys_addr_to for esdhc_base to discard
the #ifdef.
--- include/fsl_esdhc.h | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
include/fsl_esdhc.h +1 -5
@@ -168,11 +168,7 @@#define ESDHC_VENDORSPEC_VSELECT 0x00000002/* Use 1.8V */ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg { -#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LAYERSCAPE -u64 esdhc_base; -#else -u32 esdhc_base; -#endif +phys_addr_t esdhc_base;u32 sdhc_clk;u8 max_bus_width;struct mmc_config cfg;
Signature · 1 line
2.6.2
PATCH 2/2 fsl: esdhc: support driver model
Support Driver Model for fsl esdhc driver.
In order to minimize the change, reuse the fsl_esdhc_initialize function. This new way is to fill an fsl_esdhc_cfg struture and pass it to fsl_esdhc_initialize, just like the code in different board codes.
Introduce a 'struct mmc *mmc' entry in fsl_esdhc_cfg structure, otherwise fsl_esdhc_initialize may need to be restructured which will cause lots changes for board code.
Since clk driver is not implemented, use mxc_get_clock here to fill cfg->sdhc_clk. Anyway we can utilize the pinctrl imx driver now, except the SPL part, we can drop the pinmux settings from board file for mmc.
There are so many "ifdef" in the file, maybe we can use driver data or quirks to cover these. But to minimize changes for this patch, these are not included. Later we can try to discard the nasty ifdef.
Has been tested on i.MX6UL 9x9 EVK board:
"
=>dm tree
....
simple_bus [ + ] | `-- aips-bus at 02100000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02190000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02194000
....
=> mmc listFSL_SDHC: 0 (SD)FSL_SDHC: 1 (SD)
"
--- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fsl_esdhc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c +81 -0
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@#include <fsl_esdhc.h> #include <fdt_support.h> #include <asm/io.h> +#include <dm.h> +#include <asm/arch/clock.h> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR ;
@@ -739,6 +741,8 @@ int fsl_esdhc_initialize(bd_t *bis, struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg)if (mmc ==NULL )return -1 ; + cfg->mmc = mmc; +return 0 ; }
@@ -819,3 +823,80 @@ void fdt_fixup_esdhc(void *blob, bd_t *bd) 4 + 1, 1); }#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_DM_MMC +static int fsl_esdhc_probe (struct udevice *dev) +{ +struct mmc_uclass_priv *upriv =dev_get_uclass_priv (dev); +struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg =dev_get_priv (dev); +const void *fdt = gd->fdt_blob; +fdt_addr_t addr; +unsigned int val; +int node = dev->of_offset; +int ret; + + addr =dev_get_addr (dev); +if (addr ==FDT_ADDR_T_NONE ) +return -EINVAL ; + + cfg->esdhc_base = (phys_addr_t )addr; + + val =fdtdec_get_int (fdt, node,"bus-width" ,-1 ); +if (val ==8 ) + cfg->max_bus_width =8 ; +else if (val ==4 ) + cfg->max_bus_width =4 ; +else + cfg->max_bus_width =1 ; + +/* +* TODO: +* Because lack of clk driver, if SDHC clk is not enabled, +* need to enable it first before this driver is invoked. +* +* we use MXC_ESDHC_CLK to get clk freq. +* If one would like to make this function work, +* the aliases should be provided in dts as this: +* +* aliases { +* mmc0 = &usdhc1; +* mmc1 = &usdhc2; +* mmc2 = &usdhc3; +* mmc3 = &usdhc4; +* }; +* Then if your board only supports mmc2 and mmc3, but we can +* correctly get the seq as 2 and 3, then let mxc_get_clock +* work as expected. +*/ + cfg->sdhc_clk =mxc_get_clock (MXC_ESDHC_CLK + dev->seq); +if (cfg->sdhc_clk <=0 ) { +dev_err (dev,"Unable to get clk for %s\n" , dev->name); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + ret =fsl_esdhc_initialize (NULL , cfg); +if (ret) +return ret; + + upriv->mmc = cfg->mmc; + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct udevice_id fsl_esdhc_ids[] = { + { .compatible ="fsl,imx6ul-usdhc" , }, + { .compatible ="fsl,imx6sx-usdhc" , }, + { .compatible ="fsl,imx6sl-usdhc" , }, + { .compatible ="fsl,imx6q-usdhc" , }, + { .compatible ="fsl,imx7d-usdhc" , }, + {/* sentinel */ } +}; + +U_BOOT_DRIVER (fsl_esdhc) = { + .name ="fsl_esdhc_mmc" , + .id =UCLASS_MMC , + .of_match = fsl_esdhc_ids, + .probe = fsl_esdhc_probe, + .priv_auto_alloc_size =sizeof (struct fsl_esdhc_cfg ), +}; +#endif
include/fsl_esdhc.h +1 -0
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg {u32 sdhc_clk;u8 max_bus_width;struct mmc_config cfg; +struct mmc *mmc; };/* Select the correct accessors depending on endianess */
Signature · 1 line
2.6.2
PATCH 2/2 fsl: esdhc: support driver model
Hi Peng,
Quoted 42 lines · Peng Fan
Support Driver Model for fsl esdhc driver.
In order to minimize the change, reuse the
fsl_esdhc_initializefunction. This new way is to fill anfsl_esdhc_cfgstruture and pass it tofsl_esdhc_initialize, just like the code in different board codes.Introduce a 'struct mmc *mmc' entry in
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, otherwisefsl_esdhc_initializemay need to be restructured which will cause lots changes for board code.Since clk driver is not implemented, use
mxc_get_clockhere to fillcfg->sdhc_clk. Anyway we can utilize the pinctrl imx driver now, except the SPL part, we can drop the pinmux settings from board file for mmc.There are so many "ifdef" in the file, maybe we can use driver data or quirks to cover these. But to minimize changes for this patch, these are not included. Later we can try to discard the nasty ifdef.
Has been tested on i.MX6UL 9x9 EVK board:
"
=>dm tree
....simple_bus [ + ] | `-- aips-bus at 02100000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02190000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02194000....
=> mmc listFSL_SDHC: 0 (SD)FSL_SDHC: 1 (SD)
"Signed-off-by Peng Fan <[email protected]>Cc York Sun <[email protected]>Cc Yangbo Lu <[email protected]>Cc Hector Palacios <[email protected]>Cc Eric Nelson <[email protected]>Cc Stefano Babic <[email protected]>Cc Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>Cc Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>Cc Simon Glass <[email protected]>
Quoted 4 lines
--- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fsl_esdhc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
I'm nervous about this patch. It is calling board code from a driver, which we should avoid.
Perhaps it would be better to start by refactoring things to fix the problems you mention, and then come back to this patch? I'm worried we'll end up with a driver model conversion that never gets properly finished if we do things in the wrong order.
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 2/2 fsl: esdhc: support driver model
Hi Simon,
Quoted 50 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Peng,
Quoted 42 lines · Peng Fan
Support Driver Model for fsl esdhc driver.
In order to minimize the change, reuse the
fsl_esdhc_initializefunction. This new way is to fill anfsl_esdhc_cfgstruture and pass it tofsl_esdhc_initialize, just like the code in different board codes.Introduce a 'struct mmc *mmc' entry in
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, otherwisefsl_esdhc_initializemay need to be restructured which will cause lots changes for board code.Since clk driver is not implemented, use
mxc_get_clockhere to fillcfg->sdhc_clk. Anyway we can utilize the pinctrl imx driver now, except the SPL part, we can drop the pinmux settings from board file for mmc.There are so many "ifdef" in the file, maybe we can use driver data or quirks to cover these. But to minimize changes for this patch, these are not included. Later we can try to discard the nasty ifdef.
Has been tested on i.MX6UL 9x9 EVK board:
"
=>dm tree
....simple_bus [ + ] | `-- aips-bus at 02100000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02190000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02194000....
=> mmc listFSL_SDHC: 0 (SD)FSL_SDHC: 1 (SD)
"Signed-off-by Peng Fan <[email protected]>Cc York Sun <[email protected]>Cc Yangbo Lu <[email protected]>Cc Hector Palacios <[email protected]>Cc Eric Nelson <[email protected]>Cc Stefano Babic <[email protected]>Cc Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>Cc Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>Cc Simon Glass <[email protected]>Quoted 4 lines
--- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fsl_esdhc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
Quoted 2 lines
I'm nervous about this patch. It is calling board code from a driver, which we should avoid.
No. I may need to write more in the commit log.
The current way without driver model is
board code fill fsl_esdhc_cfg strucure and then call fsl_esdhc_initialize which is in driver/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c.
In order to minimize changes, in this patch, the probe function will fill fsl_esdhc_cfg structure and call fsl_esdhc_initialize.
Then we can drop the function call to fsl_esdhc_initialize in different board code.
I originally want to rewrite fsl_esdhc_cfg structure, may give it a new name such as fsl_esdhc_platdata or priv, but this may incur lots changes in board code, because board code also refers to this structure. So I keep in.
Quoted 4 lines
Perhaps it would be better to start by refactoring things to fix the problems you mention, and then come back to this patch? I'm worried we'll end up with a driver model conversion that never gets properly finished if we do things in the wrong order.
Please kind take my upper words. I am still thinking add "non-removable", "cd-gpios" related code in this patch, so I'll write a new version patch.
Thanks,
Peng.
Quoted 3 lines
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 2/2 fsl: esdhc: support driver model
Hi Peng,
Quoted 70 lines · Peng Fan
Hi Simon,
Quoted 50 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Peng,
Quoted 42 lines · Peng Fan
Support Driver Model for fsl esdhc driver.
In order to minimize the change, reuse the
fsl_esdhc_initializefunction. This new way is to fill anfsl_esdhc_cfgstruture and pass it tofsl_esdhc_initialize, just like the code in different board codes.Introduce a 'struct mmc *mmc' entry in
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, otherwisefsl_esdhc_initializemay need to be restructured which will cause lots changes for board code.Since clk driver is not implemented, use
mxc_get_clockhere to fillcfg->sdhc_clk. Anyway we can utilize the pinctrl imx driver now, except the SPL part, we can drop the pinmux settings from board file for mmc.There are so many "ifdef" in the file, maybe we can use driver data or quirks to cover these. But to minimize changes for this patch, these are not included. Later we can try to discard the nasty ifdef.
Has been tested on i.MX6UL 9x9 EVK board:
"
=>dm tree
....simple_bus [ + ] | `-- aips-bus at 02100000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02190000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02194000....
=> mmc listFSL_SDHC: 0 (SD)FSL_SDHC: 1 (SD)
"Signed-off-by Peng Fan <[email protected]>Cc York Sun <[email protected]>Cc Yangbo Lu <[email protected]>Cc Hector Palacios <[email protected]>Cc Eric Nelson <[email protected]>Cc Stefano Babic <[email protected]>Cc Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>Cc Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>Cc Simon Glass <[email protected]>Quoted 4 lines
--- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fsl_esdhc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)Quoted 2 lines
I'm nervous about this patch. It is calling board code from a driver, which we should avoid.
No. I may need to write more in the commit log.
The current way without driver model is
board code fillfsl_esdhc_cfgstrucure and then callfsl_esdhc_initializewhich is indriver/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c.In order to minimize changes, in this patch, the probe function will fill
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure and callfsl_esdhc_initialize.Then we can drop the function call to
fsl_esdhc_initializein different board code.I originally want to rewrite
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, may give it a new name such asfsl_esdhc_platdataor priv, but this may incur lots changes in board code, because board code also refers to this structure. So I keep in.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Perhaps it would be better to start by refactoring things to fix the problems you mention, and then come back to this patch? I'm worried we'll end up with a driver model conversion that never gets properly finished if we do things in the wrong order.
Please kind take my upper words. I am still thinking add "non-removable", "cd-gpios" related code in this patch, so I'll write a new version patch.
When will this work be finished, so that the driver does not call board code?
At least, we should have a TODO here
Regards,
Simon
PATCH 2/2 fsl: esdhc: support driver model
Hi Simon,
Quoted 78 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Peng,
Quoted 75 lines · Peng Fan
Hi Simon,
Quoted 50 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Peng,
Quoted 42 lines · Peng Fan
Support Driver Model for fsl esdhc driver.
In order to minimize the change, reuse the
fsl_esdhc_initializefunction. This new way is to fill anfsl_esdhc_cfgstruture and pass it tofsl_esdhc_initialize, just like the code in different board codes.Introduce a 'struct mmc *mmc' entry in
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, otherwisefsl_esdhc_initializemay need to be restructured which will cause lots changes for board code.Since clk driver is not implemented, use
mxc_get_clockhere to fillcfg->sdhc_clk. Anyway we can utilize the pinctrl imx driver now, except the SPL part, we can drop the pinmux settings from board file for mmc.There are so many "ifdef" in the file, maybe we can use driver data or quirks to cover these. But to minimize changes for this patch, these are not included. Later we can try to discard the nasty ifdef.
Has been tested on i.MX6UL 9x9 EVK board:
"
=>dm tree
....simple_bus [ + ] | `-- aips-bus at 02100000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02190000 mmc [ + ] | |-- usdhc at 02194000....
=> mmc listFSL_SDHC: 0 (SD)FSL_SDHC: 1 (SD)
"Signed-off-by Peng Fan <[email protected]>Cc York Sun <[email protected]>Cc Yangbo Lu <[email protected]>Cc Hector Palacios <[email protected]>Cc Eric Nelson <[email protected]>Cc Stefano Babic <[email protected]>Cc Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>Cc Pantelis Antoniou <[email protected]>Cc Simon Glass <[email protected]>Quoted 4 lines
--- drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/fsl_esdhc.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)Quoted 2 lines
I'm nervous about this patch. It is calling board code from a driver, which we should avoid.
No. I may need to write more in the commit log.
The current way without driver model is
board code fillfsl_esdhc_cfgstrucure and then callfsl_esdhc_initializewhich is indriver/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c.In order to minimize changes, in this patch, the probe function will fill
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure and callfsl_esdhc_initialize.Then we can drop the function call to
fsl_esdhc_initializein different board code.I originally want to rewrite
fsl_esdhc_cfgstructure, may give it a new name such asfsl_esdhc_platdataor priv, but this may incur lots changes in board code, because board code also refers to this structure. So I keep in.Quoted 4 lines
Perhaps it would be better to start by refactoring things to fix the problems you mention, and then come back to this patch? I'm worried we'll end up with a driver model conversion that never gets properly finished if we do things in the wrong order.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Please kind take my upper words. I am still thinking add "non-removable", "cd-gpios" related code in this patch, so I'll write a new version patch.
When will this work be finished, so that the driver does not call board code?
Yeah. The driver does not call board code. My commit log may be misleading. I have restructured my patch. After do some basic test, will send out v2 version tommorow or some day:)
Thanks,
Peng.
Quoted 5 lines
At least, we should have a TODO here
Regards,
Simon