Busybox syslogd/klogd and journald

Hello!

Can anyone think of a reason why busybox syslogd and klogd are enabled even when using systemd's journald? journald already captures both dmesg and syslog output, the other two daemons are just plain redundant.

Is it perhaps because it is unclear during compilation of busybox whether the daemons are needed?

Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.