New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)
once again, sorry for this way of replying, could you keep me CC'd as i'm not subscribed to lkml
-----------start of original message --------------
Quoted 11 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 10 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 4 lines · Adrian Bunk
Changes that remove functionally like Greg's patch are hopefully still 2.7 stuff - 2.6 is a stable kernel series and smooth upgrades inside a stable kernel series are a must for many users.
I don't necessarily agree that such changes in the userspace interface should be tied to the kernel version number, really. That's a three
or
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
four year warning period, which is unreasonably long. Six to twelve
months
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
should be long enough for udev-based replacements to stabilise and propagate out into distributions.
Users have had the 6-12 month warning about devfs for a while now :)
No, they had a three year warning. "It'll be gone in 2.8".
Quoted 2 lines
Ok, if people think that would really change anything, I'll wait a year. I'm patient :)
Delete 100 lines per week ;)
That could be done by sending in smaller patches that remove devfs calls from drivers. If nothing in the kernel is using devfs, then there is no reason to keep it around anymore...
Just a thought.
josh
-----------end of original message --------------
please don't do it /*at least not in the following two months :-)*/
what does this buy us ?
once again about the upcoming Mandrake 10.1,
we already have readded devfs support to isdn,
should we start tracking bk-head for such patches
that remove devfs support from drivers
and revert them ?
should we stay with 2.6.7 (or eventually 2.6.8)?
there is really no time to integarate/test udev
as replacement of devfs for the next release.
best,
svetljo
Signature · 2 lines
+++ GMX DSL-Tarife 3 Monate gratis* +++ Nur bis 25.7.2004 +++ Bis 24.000 MB oder 300 Freistunden inkl. http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Re: [Kernel] Re: New dev model
Quoted 2 lines · Svetoslav Slavtchev
once again, sorry for this way of replying, could you keep me CC'd as i'm not subscribed to lkml
(...)
Quoted 3 lines
That could be done by sending in smaller patches that remove devfs calls from drivers. If nothing in the kernel is using devfs, then there is no reason to keep it around anymore...
well actually removing such bits from dac960.c and cciss.c would restore devfs support for them :-(
Quoted 10 lines
please don't do it /*at least not in the following two months :-)*/
what does this buy us ?
once again about the upcoming Mandrake 10.1, we already have readded devfs support to isdn, should we start tracking bk-head for such patches that remove devfs support from drivers and revert them ? should we stay with 2.6.7 (or eventually 2.6.8)? there is really no time to integarate/test udev as replacement of devfs for the next release.
the odds're high we'll go out with udev by default.
it works smoothly for most devices (dvb and a few others seems missing but patches are pending).
drakx installer is know fully aware of it (as of today's cvs)