Patch "drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-vmwgfx-kill-some-lockdep-warnings.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
93cd16817ae5ddcfc548784b51c76bf6d7923442Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:24:35 +0200
Subject: drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings
From: Thomas Hellstrom <[email protected]>
commit 93cd16817ae5ddcfc548784b51c76bf6d7923442 upstream.
Some global KMS state that is elsewhere protected by the mode_config mutex here needs to be protected with a local mutex. Remove corresponding lockdep checks and introduce a new driver-private global_kms_state_mutex, and make sure its locking order is *after* the crtc locks in order to avoid having to release those when the new mutex is taken.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------------- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_stdu.c | 3 +++ 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c +1 -0
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ static int vmw_driver_load(struct drm_demutex_init (&dev_priv->cmdbuf_mutex);mutex_init (&dev_priv->release_mutex);mutex_init (&dev_priv->binding_mutex); +mutex_init (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);rwlock_init (&dev_priv->resource_lock);ttm_lock_init (&dev_priv->reservation_sem);spin_lock_init (&dev_priv->hw_lock);
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h +1 -0
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ struct vmw_private {struct drm_property *implicit_placement_property;unsigned num_implicit;struct vmw_framebuffer *implicit_fb; +struct mutex global_kms_state_mutex;/* * Context and surface management.
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +13 -14
@@ -2143,13 +2143,13 @@ int vmw_kms_fbdev_init_data(struct vmw_pvoid vmw_kms_del_active (struct vmw_private *dev_priv,struct vmw_display_unit *du) { -lockdep_assert_held_once (&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex); - +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);if (du->active_implicit) {if (--(dev_priv->num_implicit) ==0 ) dev_priv->implicit_fb =NULL ; du->active_implicit = false; } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex); }/**
@@ -2165,8 +2165,7 @@ void vmw_kms_add_active(struct vmw_privastruct vmw_display_unit *du, struct vmw_framebuffer *vfb) { - lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex); - + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);WARN_ON_ONCE (!dev_priv->num_implicit && dev_priv->implicit_fb);if (!du->active_implicit && du->is_implicit) {
@@ -2174,6 +2173,7 @@ void vmw_kms_add_active(struct vmw_priva du->active_implicit = true; dev_priv->num_implicit++; } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex); }/**
@@ -2190,16 +2190,13 @@ bool vmw_kms_crtc_flippable(struct vmw_p struct drm_crtc *crtc) {struct vmw_display_unit *du =vmw_crtc_to_du (crtc); +bool ret; -lockdep_assert_held_once (&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex); - -if (!du->is_implicit) -return true; - -if (dev_priv->num_implicit !=1 ) -return false; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex); + ret = !du->is_implicit || dev_priv->num_implicit ==1 ; +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex); -return true; +return ret; }/**
@@ -2214,16 +2211,18 @@ void vmw_kms_update_implicit_fb(struct vstruct vmw_display_unit *du =vmw_crtc_to_du (crtc);struct vmw_framebuffer *vfb; -lockdep_assert_held_once (&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex); +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);if (!du->is_implicit) -return ; + goto out_unlock; vfb =vmw_framebuffer_to_vfb (crtc->primary->fb);WARN_ON_ONCE (dev_priv->num_implicit !=1 && dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb); dev_priv->implicit_fb = vfb; +out_unlock: +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex); }/**
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c +3 -0
@@ -285,14 +285,17 @@ static int vmw_sou_crtc_set_config(struc }/* Only one active implicit frame-buffer at a time. */ +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);if (sou->base.is_implicit && dev_priv->implicit_fb && vfb && !(dev_priv->num_implicit ==1 && sou->base.active_implicit) && dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb) { +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);DRM_ERROR ("Multiple implicit framebuffers not supported.\n" );return -EINVAL ; } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);/* since they always map one to one these are safe */ connector = &sou->base.connector;
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_stdu.c +3 -0
@@ -553,12 +553,15 @@ static int vmw_stdu_crtc_set_config(stru }/* Only one active implicit frame-buffer at a time. */ +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);if (!turning_off && stdu->base.is_implicit && dev_priv->implicit_fb && !(dev_priv->num_implicit ==1 && stdu->base.active_implicit) && dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb) { +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);DRM_ERROR ("Multiple implicit framebuffers not supported.\n" );return -EINVAL ; } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);/* Since they always map one to one these are safe */ connector = &stdu->base.connector;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.6/drm-vmwgfx-kill-some-lockdep-warnings.patch