Patch "sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-fair-fix-cfs_rq-avg-tracking-underflow.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521aMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:50:40 +0200
Subject: sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
commit 8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521a upstream.
As per commit:
b7fa30c9cc48 ("sched/fair: Fix post_init_entity_util_avg() serialization")
Quoted 22 lines
the code generated from
update_cfs_rq_load_avg():if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) { s64 r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0); sa->load_avg = max_t(long, sa->load_avg - r, 0); sa->load_sum = max_t(s64, sa->load_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0); removed_load = 1; }turns into:
ffffffff81087064: 49 8b 85 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%r13),%rax ffffffff8108706b: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax ffffffff8108706e: 74 40 je ffffffff810870b0 <update_blocked_averages+0xc0> ffffffff81087070: 4c 89 f8 mov %r15,%rax ffffffff81087073: 49 87 85 98 00 00 00 xchg %rax,0x98(%r13) ffffffff8108707a: 49 29 45 70 sub %rax,0x70(%r13) ffffffff8108707e: 4c 89 f9 mov %r15,%rcx ffffffff81087081: bb 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%ebx ffffffff81087086: 49 83 7d 70 00 cmpq $0x0,0x70(%r13) ffffffff8108708b: 49 0f 49 4d 70 cmovns 0x70(%r13),%rcx
Quoted 2 lines
Which you'll note ends up with
sa->load_avg-= r in memory atffffffff8108707a.
So I _should_ have looked at other unserialized users of ->load_avg, but alas. Luckily nikbor reported a similar /0 from task_h_load() which instantly triggered recollection of this here problem.
Aside from the intermediate value hitting memory and causing problems, there's another problem: the underflow detection relies on the signed bit. This reduces the effective width of the variables, IOW its effectively the same as having these variables be of signed type.
This patch changes to a different means of unsigned underflow detection to not rely on the signed bit. This allows the variables to use the 'full' unsigned range. And it does so with explicit LOAD - STORE to ensure any intermediate value will never be visible in memory, allowing these unserialized loads.
Note: GCC generates crap code for this, might warrant a look later.
Note2: I say 'full' above, if we end up at U*_MAX we'll still explode;
maybe we should do clamping on add too.
--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/fair.c +25 -8
@@ -2821,6 +2821,23 @@ static inline void update_tg_load_avg(ststatic inline u64 cfs_rq_clock_task (struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); +/* +* Unsigned subtract and clamp on underflow. +* +* Explicitly do a load-store to ensure the intermediate value never hits +* memory. This allows lockless observations without ever seeing the negative +* values. +*/ +#define sub_positive (_ptr, _val) do { \ + typeof(_ptr) ptr = (_ptr); \ + typeof(*ptr) val = (_val); \ + typeof(*ptr) res, var = READ_ONCE(*ptr); \ + res = var - val; \ + if (res > var) \ + res = 0; \ + WRITE_ONCE(*ptr, res); \ +} while (0) +/* Group cfs_rq's load_avg is used for task_h_load and update_cfs_share */ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg (u64 now,struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) {
@@ -2829,15 +2846,15 @@ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avgif (atomic_long_read (&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) {s64 r =atomic_long_xchg (&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg,0 ); - sa->load_avg =max_t (long, sa->load_avg - r,0 ); - sa->load_sum =max_t (s64, sa->load_sum - r *LOAD_AVG_MAX ,0 ); +sub_positive (&sa->load_avg, r); +sub_positive (&sa->load_sum, r *LOAD_AVG_MAX ); removed =1 ; }if (atomic_long_read (&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg)) {long r =atomic_long_xchg (&cfs_rq->removed_util_avg,0 ); - sa->util_avg =max_t (long, sa->util_avg - r,0 ); - sa->util_sum =max_t (s32, sa->util_sum - r *LOAD_AVG_MAX ,0 ); +sub_positive (&sa->util_avg, r); +sub_positive (&sa->util_sum, r *LOAD_AVG_MAX ); } decayed = __update_load_avg(now, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)), sa,
@@ -2927,10 +2944,10 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struc &se->avg, se->on_rq *scale_load_down (se->load.weight), cfs_rq->curr == se, NULL); - cfs_rq->avg.load_avg =max_t (long, cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - se->avg.load_avg,0 ); - cfs_rq->avg.load_sum =max_t (s64, cfs_rq->avg.load_sum - se->avg.load_sum,0 ); - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg =max_t (long, cfs_rq->avg.util_avg - se->avg.util_avg,0 ); - cfs_rq->avg.util_sum =max_t (s32, cfs_rq->avg.util_sum - se->avg.util_sum,0 ); +sub_positive (&cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, se->avg.load_avg); +sub_positive (&cfs_rq->avg.load_sum, se->avg.load_sum); +sub_positive (&cfs_rq->avg.util_avg, se->avg.util_avg); +sub_positive (&cfs_rq->avg.util_sum, se->avg.util_sum); }/* Add the load generated by se into cfs_rq's load average */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.6/futex-calculate-the-futex-key-based-on-a-tail-page-for-file-based-futexes.patch queue-4.6/kprobes-x86-clear-tf-bit-in-fault-on-single-stepping.patch queue-4.6/sched-fair-fix-cfs_rq-avg-tracking-underflow.patch queue-4.6/x86-amd_nb-fix-boot-crash-on-non-amd-systems.patch queue-4.6/perf-x86-fix-32-bit-perf-user-callgraph-collection.patch queue-4.6/locking-qspinlock-fix-spin_unlock_wait-some-more.patch queue-4.6/locking-static_key-fix-concurrent-static_key_slow_inc.patch queue-4.6/perf-x86-intel-rapl-fix-pmus-free-during-cleanup.patch queue-4.6/locking-ww_mutex-report-recursive-ww_mutex-locking-early.patch